A tendency to favor one side of an argument over the other.

A deliberate attempt to distort the facts.

An unintentional error in the interpretation of historical evidence.

All of the above.

Political bias.

Religious bias.

Cultural bias.

Economic bias.

All of the above.

By examining the author's background and beliefs.

By considering the political and social context in which the work was written.

By comparing the work to other sources on the same topic.

All of the above.

It can lead to a distorted understanding of the past.

It can be used to justify discrimination and oppression.

It can make it difficult to learn from history.

All of the above.

By being aware of the different types of bias.

By critically evaluating sources.

By considering multiple perspectives.

All of the above.

A historian writing about the American Civil War from the perspective of the Union.

A historian writing about the American Civil War from the perspective of the Confederacy.

A historian writing about the American Civil War from the perspective of both the Union and the Confederacy.

None of the above.

A historian writing about the Holocaust from the perspective of the Nazis.

A historian writing about the Holocaust from the perspective of the victims.

A historian writing about the Holocaust from the perspective of both the Nazis and the victims.

None of the above.

A historian writing about the Vietnam War from the perspective of the United States.

A historian writing about the Vietnam War from the perspective of Vietnam.

A historian writing about the Vietnam War from the perspective of both the United States and Vietnam.

None of the above.

A historian writing about the Rwandan genocide from the perspective of the perpetrators.

A historian writing about the Rwandan genocide from the perspective of the victims.

A historian writing about the Rwandan genocide from the perspective of both the perpetrators and the victims.

None of the above.

A historian writing about the Armenian genocide from the perspective of the Ottoman Empire.

A historian writing about the Armenian genocide from the perspective of the Armenians.

A historian writing about the Armenian genocide from the perspective of both the Ottoman Empire and the Armenians.

None of the above.

A historian writing about the Holodomor from the perspective of the Soviet Union.

A historian writing about the Holodomor from the perspective of the victims.

A historian writing about the Holodomor from the perspective of both the Soviet Union and the victims.

None of the above.

A historian writing about the Great Leap Forward from the perspective of the Chinese Communist Party.

A historian writing about the Great Leap Forward from the perspective of the victims.

A historian writing about the Great Leap Forward from the perspective of both the Chinese Communist Party and the victims.

None of the above.

A historian writing about the Cultural Revolution from the perspective of the Chinese Communist Party.

A historian writing about the Cultural Revolution from the perspective of the victims.

A historian writing about the Cultural Revolution from the perspective of both the Chinese Communist Party and the victims.

None of the above.

A historian writing about the Tiananmen Square Massacre from the perspective of the Chinese Communist Party.

A historian writing about the Tiananmen Square Massacre from the perspective of the victims.

A historian writing about the Tiananmen Square Massacre from the perspective of both the Chinese Communist Party and the victims.

None of the above.

A historian writing about the Rwandan genocide from the perspective of the perpetrators.

A historian writing about the Rwandan genocide from the perspective of the victims.

A historian writing about the Rwandan genocide from the perspective of both the perpetrators and the victims.

None of the above.