A method of reasoning that allows us to infer the existence of something based on the observation of another thing.

A type of logical fallacy that occurs when we draw an invalid conclusion from a set of premises.

A form of meditation that helps us to focus our minds and achieve a state of inner peace.

A system of ethics that guides our actions and helps us to live a virtuous life.

Purvavat, Sesavat, and Karana.

Vyapti, Hetu, and Drishtanta.

Paksha, Sadhya, and Vyapti.

Anvaya, Vyatireka, and Kevalanvayi.

It allows us to infer the existence of things that we cannot directly observe.

It helps us to understand the causal relationships between different phenomena.

It enables us to make generalizations about the world around us.

All of the above.

Purvavat is an inference from cause to effect, while Sesavat is an inference from effect to cause.

Purvavat is an inference from a general rule to a specific case, while Sesavat is an inference from a specific case to a general rule.

Purvavat is an inference from the presence of a property to the presence of its cause, while Sesavat is an inference from the absence of a property to the absence of its cause.

Purvavat is an inference from the existence of something to the existence of something else, while Sesavat is an inference from the non-existence of something to the non-existence of something else.

Karana is an inference from the presence of a property to the presence of its cause, while Anvaya is an inference from the absence of a property to the absence of its cause.

Karana is an inference from the existence of something to the existence of something else, while Anvaya is an inference from the non-existence of something to the non-existence of something else.

Karana is an inference from a general rule to a specific case, while Anvaya is an inference from a specific case to a general rule.

Karana is an inference from cause to effect, while Anvaya is an inference from effect to cause.

Vyatireka is an inference from the presence of a property to the presence of its cause, while Kevalanvayi is an inference from the absence of a property to the absence of its cause.

Vyatireka is an inference from the existence of something to the existence of something else, while Kevalanvayi is an inference from the non-existence of something to the non-existence of something else.

Vyatireka is an inference from a general rule to a specific case, while Kevalanvayi is an inference from a specific case to a general rule.

Vyatireka is an inference from cause to effect, while Kevalanvayi is an inference from effect to cause.

It is the general rule that connects the cause and effect in an inference.

It is the specific case that is being inferred in an inference.

It is the property that is being observed in an inference.

It is the cause of the effect that is being inferred in an inference.

It is the general rule that connects the cause and effect in an inference.

It is the specific case that is being inferred in an inference.

It is the property that is being observed in an inference.

It is the cause of the effect that is being inferred in an inference.

It is the general rule that connects the cause and effect in an inference.

It is the specific case that is being inferred in an inference.

It is the property that is being observed in an inference.

It is the cause of the effect that is being inferred in an inference.

Kevalanvayi, Anvaya, and Vyatireka.

Purvavat, Sesavat, and Karana.

Paksha, Sadhya, and Vyapti.

Hetu, Drishtanta, and Vyapti.

Kevalanvayi is a universal affirmative proposition, while Anvaya is a universal negative proposition.

Kevalanvayi is a particular affirmative proposition, while Anvaya is a particular negative proposition.

Kevalanvayi is a general rule that connects the cause and effect in an inference, while Anvaya is the specific case that is being inferred in an inference.

Kevalanvayi is the property that is being observed in an inference, while Anvaya is the cause of the effect that is being inferred in an inference.

Vyatireka is a universal affirmative proposition, while Kevalanvayi is a universal negative proposition.

Vyatireka is a particular affirmative proposition, while Kevalanvayi is a particular negative proposition.

Vyatireka is a general rule that connects the cause and effect in an inference, while Kevalanvayi is the specific case that is being inferred in an inference.

Vyatireka is the property that is being observed in an inference, while Kevalanvayi is the cause of the effect that is being inferred in an inference.

It is the general rule that connects the cause and effect in an inference.

It is the specific case that is being inferred in an inference.

It is the property that is being observed in an inference.

It is the cause of the effect that is being inferred in an inference.

It is the general rule that connects the cause and effect in an inference.

It is the specific case that is being inferred in an inference.

It is the property that is being observed in an inference.

It is the cause of the effect that is being inferred in an inference.