Evaluation in public health policy is primarily conducted to assess the effectiveness of a policy or program in achieving its intended objectives.

Taking corrective action is not a key component of performance measurement, but rather a step that may be taken based on the results of the evaluation.

Performance measures are used in public health policy to improve the quality of services, increase efficiency, and promote accountability and transparency.

Structural measures are not a common type of performance measure used in public health policy. Process measures, outcome measures, and impact measures are more commonly used.

Using a variety of performance measures provides a more comprehensive assessment, allows for the identification of unintended consequences, and ensures that all aspects of a policy or program are being evaluated.

Technical expertise is not a challenge associated with evaluating public health policies and programs. Lack of resources, political interference, and ethical considerations are more common challenges.

Stakeholders play an important role in the evaluation of public health policies and programs by providing input into the evaluation design, providing data and information, and reviewing and providing feedback on the evaluation findings.

Reduced risk of unintended consequences is not a benefit of using evidence-based practices in public health policy. Improved health outcomes, increased cost-effectiveness, and enhanced public trust are more commonly cited benefits.

Disseminating the results of public health policy evaluations is important to inform policy makers and practitioners, promote transparency and accountability, and encourage the use of evidence-based practices.

Social media is not a common method for disseminating the results of public health policy evaluations. Peer-reviewed journals, conference presentations, and policy briefs are more commonly used.

Evaluation plays a crucial role in promoting accountability in public health policy by providing evidence of the effectiveness of policies and programs, identifying areas for improvement, and promoting transparency and public trust.

Use of evidence-based practices is not a key principle of effective performance measurement in public health policy. Clear goals and objectives, valid and reliable measures, and regular data collection and analysis are more commonly cited principles.

Using a mixed-methods approach in public health policy evaluation provides a more comprehensive understanding, allows for the triangulation of findings, and enhances the credibility of the evaluation findings.

Transformative design is not a common type of mixed-methods design used in public health policy evaluation. Sequential explanatory design, concurrent triangulation design, and nested design are more commonly used.

Ethics plays a crucial role in public health policy evaluation by ensuring the protection of human subjects, promoting transparency and accountability, and guiding the collection and use of data.