The defendant must have intended to cause the harm that resulted from their actions.

The defendant must have intended to commit the crime that they are charged with.

The defendant must have known that their actions were likely to cause harm.

The defendant must have been reckless in their actions.

Murder

Robbery

Assault

Battery

General intent crimes require the defendant to have intended to cause the harm that resulted from their actions, while specific intent crimes require the defendant to have intended to cause a specific result.

General intent crimes require the defendant to have intended to commit the crime that they are charged with, while specific intent crimes require the defendant to have intended to cause a specific result.

General intent crimes require the defendant to have known that their actions were likely to cause harm, while specific intent crimes require the defendant to have intended to cause a specific result.

General intent crimes require the defendant to have been reckless in their actions, while specific intent crimes require the defendant to have intended to cause a specific result.

Yes, if they had the specific intent to cause the harm that resulted from their actions.

Yes, if they knew that their actions were likely to cause harm.

Yes, if they were reckless in their actions.

No, they cannot be convicted of a crime if they did not have the general intent to commit the crime.

Insanity

Intoxication

Mistake of fact

All of the above

It helps to ensure that only those who intended to commit a crime are punished.

It helps to prevent people from being convicted of crimes that they did not intend to commit.

It helps to ensure that the punishment fits the crime.

All of the above

The defendant must have intended to cause the harm that resulted from their actions.

The defendant must have intended to commit the crime that they are charged with, regardless of the harm caused.

The defendant must have known that their actions were likely to cause harm.

The defendant must have been reckless in their actions.

Murder

Robbery

Assault

Battery

General intent crimes are typically punished more severely than specific intent crimes.

Specific intent crimes are typically punished more severely than general intent crimes.

There is no difference in punishment between general intent and specific intent crimes.

The punishment for a crime depends on the specific facts of the case, not on whether it is a general intent or specific intent crime.

Yes, they can be convicted of the general intent crime.

No, they cannot be convicted of the general intent crime.

It depends on the specific facts of the case.

It depends on the jurisdiction.

The defendant mistakenly believed that they were acting in self-defense.

The defendant mistakenly believed that they had the consent of the victim.

The defendant mistakenly believed that the property they stole was abandoned.

All of the above

General intent and malice aforethought are the same thing.

General intent is a lesser degree of intent than malice aforethought.

General intent is a greater degree of intent than malice aforethought.

General intent and malice aforethought are unrelated concepts.

Yes, they can be convicted of the crime.

No, they cannot be convicted of the crime.

It depends on the specific facts of the case.

It depends on the jurisdiction.

General intent and negligence are the same thing.

General intent is a lesser degree of intent than negligence.

General intent is a greater degree of intent than negligence.

General intent and negligence are unrelated concepts.