0

Statement Argument - 1

Description: Statement Argument - 1
Number of Questions: 15
Created by:
Tags: Statement Argument - 1 Verbal Reasoning Strong and Weak Argument Critical Reasoning Validating Assumptions Statement/Argument English Language
Attempted 0/15 Correct 0 Score 0

Directions: In the question below, a question statement is followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the given arguments is/are ‘strong'.

Question: Should there be only one rate of interest for term deposits of varying durations in banks? Arguments: I. No, people will refrain from keeping money for longer duration resulting into reduction of liquidity level of banks. II. Yes, this will be much simple for the common people and they may be encouraged to keep more money in banks.

  1. Only argument I is strong.

  2. Only argument II is strong.

  3. Either I or II is strong.

  4. Neither I nor II is strong.

  5. Both I and II are strong.


Correct Option: A
Explanation:

I is strong because higher rates attract people to deposit money for longer duration. If there will be only one rate of interest for term deposits for varying durations, this will adversely affect deposit of money in banks for longer duration and also the liquidity levels of banks. II is not strong because only one rate of interest does not encourage people for more savings.

Directions: In the item given below, a question is followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the given arguments is/are ‘strong'.

Question: Should all the drugs patented and manufactured in western countries be first tried out on sample basis, before giving license for sale to general public in India? Arguments: I. Yes, many such drugs require different doses and duration for Indian population and hence, it is necessary. II. No, this is just not feasible and hence, cannot be implemented.

  1. Only argument I is strong.

  2. Only argument II is strong.

  3. Either I or II is strong.

  4. Neither I nor II is strong.

  5. Both I and II are strong.


Correct Option: A
Explanation:

I is strong as it is based on an established fact. II is not true. Hence, II is a weak argument.

Directions: In the item given below, a question is followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the given arguments is/are ‘strong'.

Question: Should there be a restriction on the migration of people from one state to another in India? Arguments: I. No, any Indian citizen has basic right to stay at any place of his/her choice and hence, he/she cannot be stopped. II. Yes, this is the way to affect an equitable distribution of resources across the states in India.

  1. Only argument I is strong.

  2. Only argument II is strong.

  3. Either I or II is strong.

  4. Neither I nor II is strong.

  5. Both I and II are strong.


Correct Option: A
Explanation:

I is strong on the basis of constitutional rights. II is not true. Hence, it is a weak argument.

Directions: In the item given below, a question is followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the given arguments is/are ‘strong'.

Question: Should government close down loss-making public sector enterprises? Arguments: I. No, all employees will lose their jobs, security and earning and what would they do? II. Yes, in a competitive world, the rule is 'survival of the fittest'.

  1. Only argument I is strong.

  2. Only argument II is strong.

  3. Either I or II is strong.

  4. Neither I nor II is strong.

  5. Both I and II are strong.


Correct Option: A
Explanation:

I is strong because we cannot ignore a large section of employees. II is not strong because it does not add anything to the statement.

Directions: In the question below a question is followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the given arguments is/are ‘strong'.

Question: Should all the professional colleges in India be encouraged to run their own courses without affiliation to any university? Arguments: I. Yes, this is the only way to create more opportunities for those who seek professional training. II. No, this will dilute the quality of professional training as all such colleges may not be equipped to conduct such courses.

  1. Only argument I is strong.

  2. Only argument II is strong.

  3. Either I or II is strong.

  4. Neither I nor II is strong.

  5. Both I and II are strong.


Correct Option: B
Explanation:

Argument I is not strong because of two reasons (i) it is not the only way to create more opportunities for those who seek professional training. (ii) opportunity to get professional training is not enough, quality of the training is equally important. Argument II is strong because chances of degrading of the standard of training can't be ruled out.

Directions: The question given below is followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the given arguments is/are ‘strong'.

Question: Should there be a complete ban on tobacco products in India? Arguments: I. No, it will render a large number of people unemployed. II. No, the government will have a large amount of loss in money as it will not be earned by taxes on these products.

  1. Only argument I is strong.

  2. Only argument II is strong.

  3. Either I or II is strong.

  4. Neither I nor II is strong.

  5. Both I and II are strong.


Correct Option: E
Explanation:

Both the arguments are strong. I is strong because unemployment is a major problem. II is also strong because it debilitates the financial condition and will affect the developmental work of the government.

Directions: In the item given below, a question is followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the given arguments is/are ‘strong'.

Question: Should all students passing out from the government-run colleges and desirous of settling abroad be asked to pay back the cost of their education to the government? Arguments: I. Yes, such students who study on the resources of the exchequer should be discouraged to leave the country. II. No, every citizen has the right to select their place of further study or work and therefore, such a condition is unjustified.

  1. Only argument I is strong.

  2. Only argument II is strong.

  3. Either I or II is strong.

  4. Neither I nor II is strong.

  5. Both I and II are strong.


Correct Option: B
Explanation:

Argument I appears to be lopsided, particularly since there is nothing to suggest that there had been an option for the students to pay the full fee or the concessional fee. If at all resources of the exchequer were expended, it was no fault of the students. Argument II seems to be strong since, like every free citizen, students have the right to decide what is in their best interest.

Directions: The question given below is followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the following arguments is/are ‘strong'.

Question: Should the press in India be given full freedom?

Arguments: I. Yes, because only then people will become politically enlightened. II. No, because full freedom to press will create problems.

  1. Only I is strong.

  2. Either I or II is strong.

  3. Only II is strong.

  4. Neither I nor II is strong.

  5. Both I and II are strong.


Correct Option: D
Explanation:

Political enlightenment is not the main motive of the media. So, statement I is not strong enough. Media is there to provide correct and impartial news. Second statement also restricts the working of the press as an independent and impartial medium.

Directions: The question below is followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the given arguments is/are ‘strong'. Mark your answer as

Should the oil companies be allowed to fix the price of petroleum products depending on market conditions? Arguments: I. Yes, this is the only way to make the oil companies commercially viable. II. No, this will put additional burden on the retail prices of essential commodities and will cause a lot of hardships to the masses.

  1. if only argument I is strong

  2. if only argument II is strong

  3. if either I or II is strong

  4. if neither I nor II is strong

  5. if both I and II are strong


Correct Option: D
Explanation:

Statement I talks only about the oil companies and does not reflect on the plight of the common people. With this, oil prices would increase drastically. The second statement correctly sums up the condition and presents a strong argument to the question.

Directions: In the question, a statement is followed by two assumptions numbered I and II. An assumption is something supposed or taken for granted. Consider the statement and the following assumptions and mark your answer as

Statement: Bank ‘A’ has announced reduction of half percentage on the interest rate on retail lending with immediate effect. Assumptions: I. Other banks may also reduce their retail lending rates to be in competition. II. The bank ‘A’ may be able to attract more customers for availing retail loans.

  1. if only assumption I is implicit

  2. if either assumption I or II is implicit

  3. if only assumption II is implicit

  4. if neither assumption I nor II is implicit

  5. if both assumptions I and II are implicit


Correct Option: C
Explanation:

Only second statement is implicit. What the other banks will do cannot be said from the question statement.

Directions: The question below is followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the given arguments is/are ‘strong'. Mark your answer as

Should all the profit making public sector units be sold to private companies? Arguments: I. Yes, this will help the government to augment its resources for implementing the development programmes. II. No, the private companies will not be able to run these units effectively.

  1. if only argument II is strong

  2. if only argument I is strong

  3. if either argument I or II is strong

  4. if neither argument I nor II is strong

  5. if both arguments I and II are strong


Correct Option: B
Explanation:

The first statement is a strong argument as the funds raised would help the government to carry out important developmental programmes. The second statement is quite weak and can be easily be challenged.

Directions: In the question below, a question is followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the given arguments is/are ‘strong'. Mark answer

Question: Should the government stop giving subsidy to loss-making public sector units? Arguments: I. Yes, subsidies can never cure the ailment in loss-making public sector units. II. No, public sector units have carved out a niche for themselves in India’s developmental process and they should be sustained at all costs.

  1. if argument A is strong

  2. if argument B is strong

  3. if both arguments are strong

  4. if neither I nor II is strong

  5. if either argument I or II is strong


Correct Option: B
Explanation:

Public sector banks are backbone of a nation.

Directions: In the following question, a statement is followed by three arguments labelled A, B and C. You have to decide which of the given arguments is/are ‘strong'.

Statement: Should there be a restriction on the construction of high rise buildings in big cities in India? Arguments: (A) No, big cities in India do not have adequate open land plots to accommodate the growing population. (B) Yes, only the builders and developers benefit from the construction of high rise buildings. (C) Yes, the Govt. should first provide adequate infrastructural facilities to existing buildings before allowing the construction of new high rise buildings.

  1. Only (B) is strong

  2. Only (C) is strong

  3. Both (A) and (C) are strong

  4. Only (A) is strong

  5. None of these


Correct Option: C
Explanation:

Statement (B) is weak. Builders and developers benefit is not adequate reason to impose restriction on the construction of high rise buildings in big cities. Statements (A) and (C) are strong, hence (3) is the correct answer.

Directions: In the question below a question is followed by three arguments labelled A, B and C. You have to decide which of the given arguments is/are ‘strong'.

Question: Should road repair work in big cities be carried out only late at night? Arguments: (A) No, this way the work will never get completed. (B) No, there will be unnecessary use of electricity. (C) Yes, the commuters will face lot of problems due to repair work during the day.

  1. None is strong

  2. Only (A) is strong

  3. Only (C) is strong

  4. Only (B) and (C) are strong

  5. Only (A) and (B) are strong


Correct Option: C
Explanation:

Statement (A) and (B) are weak. Unnecessary use of electricity is not a strong reason to obstruct the work in the night, if it is required, and ‘will never get complete’ makes (A) incorrect. Option (C) is strong.

Directions: The question below is followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the given arguments is/are ‘strong'.

Should the fees of all private professional colleges be made equal to those of government professional colleges?

Arguments: I. No, private colleges need additional funds to maintain quality of education. II. Yes, otherwise a large number of meritorious students will not be able to study in these colleges due to exorbitantly high fees.

  1. Only I is strong.

  2. Either I or II is strong.

  3. Only II is strong.

  4. Neither I nor II is strong.

  5. Both I and II are strong.


Correct Option: A
Explanation:

The first statement is strong enough as private colleges are known for their quality. To maintain this, they need to charge higher fees. The second statement is not strong enough as the fees of private colleges, if brought down, may bring down the quality. Meritorious students can always be given scholarships, etc.

- Hide questions