0

Statement Argument - 3

Description: Statement Argument - 3
Number of Questions: 15
Created by:
Tags: Statement Argument - 3 Critical Reasoning Statement/Argument English Language
Attempted 0/15 Correct 0 Score 0

Directions: In the question below, a question statement is followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the given arguments is/are ‘strong'.

Question: Should all the non-performing employees in the public sector be compulsorily retrenched from service? Arguments: I. No, this will give an unjust handle to the management and they may use it indiscriminately. II. Yes, this will help in increase the level of efficiency of these organistations and these organisations will become profitable establishments.

  1. Only argument I is strong.

  2. Only argument II is strong.

  3. Either I or II is strong.

  4. Both I and II are strong.

  5. Neither I nor II is strong.


Correct Option: D
Explanation:

I is strong because such sweeping power often tends to fall prey to vested interests. II is strong on the ground of performance.

Directions: In the question below, a question is followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the given arguments is/are ‘strong'.

Question: Should there be a cap on maximum number of contestants for parliamentary elections in any constituency? Arguments: I. Yes, this will make the parliamentary elections more meaningful as the voters can make a considered judgment for casting their vote. II. No, in a democracy, any person fulfilling the eligibility criteria can contest parliamentary elections and there should be no such restrictions.

  1. Only argument I is strong.

  2. Only argument II is strong.

  3. Either I or II is strong.

  4. Both I and II are strong.

  5. Neither I nor II is strong.


Correct Option: D
Explanation:

I is strong because it will make the election process more meaningful and purposeful. II is strong on account of tenets of democracy.

Directions: In the question below, a question is followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the given arguments is/are ‘strong'.

Question: Should all the foreign banks be immediately asked to close down their operations in India? Arguments: I. No, this will have an adverse impact on the Indian economy. II. Yes, this is the only way to make Indian banks survive and prosper.

  1. Only argument I is strong.

  2. Only argument II is strong.

  3. Either argument I or argument II is strong.

  4. Neither argument I nor argument II is strong.

  5. Both arguments I and II are strong.


Correct Option: A
Explanation:

I is strong because it is not desirable that the Indian economy be led into trouble. II is weak because this is not the only way.

Directions: The question below is followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the following arguments is/are ‘strong'.

Question: Should all beggars on the roads in the big cities of India be forcibly sent to villages? Arguments: I. No, this is grossly unfair and these people may die of hunger if they are sent to villages. II. Yes, these people create a bad impression of our country in the eyes of the foreigners who visit our country and hence, should be removed.

  1. Both I and II are strong.

  2. Only II is strong.

  3. Either I or II is strong.

  4. Only I is strong.

  5. Neither I nor II is strong.


Correct Option: D
Explanation:

Only I is strong because it would be completely unfair if we send all the beggars to villages. Also, Nobody wants to become a beggar deliberatately. If the person who does not have a single penny, starts begging, we cannot send the person to a village.

Directions: In the question below a question is followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the given arguments is/are ‘strong'.

Question: Should persons convicted of criminal offences in the past be allowed to contest elections in India? Arguments: I. No, such persons can not serve the cause of the people and the country. II. Yes, it is democracy and let people decide whom to vote.

  1. Only argument I is strong.

  2. Only argument II is strong.

  3. Either I or II is strong.

  4. Neither I nor II is strong.

  5. Both I and II are strong.


Correct Option: B
Explanation:

I is not true. Hence, I is not strong. II is strong because the choice of the people should be given supremacy.

Directions: In the question below a question is followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the given arguments is/are ‘strong'.

Question: Should there be a maximum ceiling imposed on the earnings of an individual in an organisation? Arguments: I. Yes, this will help equitable distribution of earnings to all the employees. II. No, the organisation should have free hand to decide the pay packets of its employees.

  1. Only argument I is strong.

  2. Only argument II is strong.

  3. Either I or II is strong.

  4. Neither I nor II is strong.

  5. Both I and II are strong.


Correct Option: D
Explanation:

In reality a maximum ceiling will reduce the scope of getting higher salary for those who work hard and contribute very much in an organization’s profit. Hence, I is not true. Therefore, I is not strong. II is not strong because it does not add sufficient reasons to impose maximum ceiling on the earnings of an individual in an organisation.

Directions: In the question below a question is followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the given arguments is/are ‘strong'.

Question: Should Hindi language be made compulsory at school level in all the states in India? Arguments: I. No, students should not be forced to learn any language. II. Yes, it is the national language, so everybody must learn it.

  1. Only argument I is strong.

  2. Only argument II is strong.

  3. Either I or II is strong.

  4. Neither I nor II is strong.

  5. Both I and II are strong.


Correct Option: B
Explanation:

I is not strong because it has nothing substantial. The use of compulsory in the question itself implies being forced. II is strong because national language is not something to be seen as a mere token.

Directions: In the question below a question is followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the given arguments is/are ‘strong'.

Question: Should India support all the international policies of United States of America? Arguments: I. No, may other powerful countries do not support the same. II. Yes, this is the only way to gain access to USA developmental funds.

  1. Only argument I is strong.

  2. Only argument II is strong.

  3. Either I or II is strong.

  4. Neither I nor II is strong.

  5. Both I and II are strong.


Correct Option: D
Explanation:

Argument I is not strong because India should take its stand according to its need. Argument II is not correct because of the word 'only'. Hence argument II is not strong.

Directions: In the question below a question is followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the given arguments is/are ‘strong'.

Question: Should all those who have come in contact with the patients’ infectious respiratory disease be quarantined in their houses? Arguments: I. No, nobody should be quarantined unless they are tested and found to be infected by the virus causing the disease. II. Yes, this is the only way to control the spread of the dreaded disease.

  1. if only argument II is strong

  2. if only argument I is strong

  3. if either argument I or II is strong

  4. if neither argument I nor II is strong


Correct Option: B
Explanation:

Only argument I seems to be strong. The use of 'only' in argument II makes it invalid. Any disease can be checked by detecting causative organism and treating it properly. If the disease is contagious, the people suffering from the disease should be provided with suitable treatment.

Directions: A statement followed by two arguments numbered I and II is given below. You have to decide which of the given arguments is/are ‘strong'.

Statement: Should the incharge of all the police stations in the country be transferred every two years? Arguments: I. No, every transfer creates a lot of administrative hassles and also causes a lot of inconvenience to the police officers. II. Yes, this is the only way to eradicate the nexus between police officers and anti social elements.

  1. Only argument I is strong.

  2. Only argument II is strong.

  3. Either I or II is strong.

  4. Neither I nor II is strong.

  5. Both I and II are strong.


Correct Option: D
Explanation:

The first argument is not strong enough as it implies that all transfers should be stopped because they cause administrative hassles and inconvenience to the concerned. Second argument is also not strong as it is presupposing that a nexus exists between police and anti-social elements. It is not necessary that everywhere a nexus exists. So, option 4 is correct.

Directions: In the question below, a question is followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the given arguments is/are ‘strong'.

Question: Should computer courses be made compulsory in schools? Arguments: I. Yes, training in computers from an early age would help students later on in their careers. II. No, courses in school are very demanding as it is and computer training would only add to the burden on the children.

  1. if argument A is strong

  2. if argument B is strong

  3. if both arguments are strong

  4. if none of the arguments is strong

  5. if either argument I or II is strong


Correct Option: A
Explanation:

Yes, it is the need of future.

Directions: In the question, a statement is followed by two assumptions numbered I and II. An assumption is something supposed or taken for granted. Consider the statement and the following assumptions. Statement: The Mohan Cooperative Housing Society has put up a notice at its gate that sales persons are not allowed inside the society. Assumptions: I. All the sales persons will stay away from the Mohan Cooperative Housing Society. II. The security guard posted at the gate may be able to stop the sales persons entering the society.

  1. if only assumption I is implicit

  2. if both assumption I and II are implicit

  3. if only assumption II is implicit

  4. if neither assumption I nor II is implicit


Correct Option: B
Explanation:

Assumption I is valid as it assumes compliance with the notice put up by the society. Assumption II is also valid as it assumes that the security guard also follows the instructions provided in the notice in order to keep the sales persons from entering the society.

Directions: In the question below a question is followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the given arguments is/are ‘strong'.

Question: Should mutual funds be brought under strict government control? Arguments: I. Yes, that is one of the ways to protect the interest of the investors. II. No, strict government controls are likely to be counter productive.

  1. if only argument II is strong

  2. if only argument I is strong

  3. if either argument I or II is strong

  4. if neither argument I nor II is strong


Correct Option: B
Explanation:

Argument 1 is strong because investor's interest is protected, but argument 2 is based on a wrong assumption and hence, is not strong.

Directions: In the following question, a statement is followed by three arguments labelled A, B and C. You have to decide which of the given arguments is/are ‘strong'.

Statement: Should there be complete ban on setting up of thermal power plants in India? Arguments: (A) Yes, this is the only way to arrest further addition to environmental pollution. (B) No, there is a huge shortage of electricity in most parts of the country and hence generation of electricity needs to be augmented. (C) No, many developed countries continue to set up thermal power plants in their countries.

  1. None is strong

  2. Only (A) is strong

  3. Only (B) is strong

  4. Only (C) is strong

  5. Only either (A) or (B) is strong


Correct Option: C
Explanation:

‘Only way’ makes statement incorrect, hence (A) is not logical. Statement (C) is weak as one can’t take any decision because others are doing so. One’s decision should be based on oneself requirement. Statement (B) is strong as if there is shortage of electricity, so there should be no ban on setting up of thermal power.

Directions: The question given below is followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the following arguments is/are ‘strong'.

Question: Should there be a restriction on the number of ministers in each cabinet of India? Arguments: I. Yes, as a result of this, a lot of money will be saved and the same can be used in developmental programmes. II. No, there should not be such restrictions on democratically elected representatives and it should be left to the judgement of the leader of the council of ministers.

  1. if either I or II is strong

  2. if only argument I is strong

  3. if only argument II is strong

  4. if neither I nor II is strong

  5. if both I and II are strong


Correct Option: B
Explanation:

Correct option is 2. The country today is incapable of maintaining the expenses of a big cabinet, therefore their number should be restricted. 

- Hide questions