0

Verbal Section (GRE)

Description: GRE FLT - 6
Number of Questions: 13
Created by:
Tags: GRE FLT - 6 Time and Work Sentence Equivalence Vocabulary in context Inference Main Idea Purpose Strengthen Specific Details
Attempted 0/12 Correct 0 Score 0

Directions: Select the two answer choices that, when used to complete the sentence, fit the meaning of the sentence as a whole and produce completed sentences that are alike in meaning.

Prominent scientists and intellectuals cast Professor Dawkins as the __________ of a selfish culture, accusing him and his fellow socio-biologists of setting the cultural stage for the “I got mine” age of Ronald Reagan and Margaret Thatcher.

  1. herald angel

  2. forecaster

  3. prophet

  4. harbinger

  5. soothsayer

  6. spoiler


Correct Option: A
Explanation:

(1) Correct; because Dawkins and his fellow socio-biologists are 'setting the stage' for a selfish culture, they would have to be initiators of the process. Herald angel describes their role aptly. (2) Incorrect; a forecaster would be someone who predicts something. Here Dawkins is setting the stage for 'I got mine' age. He is making it happen, not predicting it will happen. (3) Incorrect; a prophet would be one man advocating a belief. Here, Dawkins, and his fellow socio-biologists, are hawking the 'I got me' age. (4) Correct; because Dawkins and his colleagues are ushering in a new culture of selfishness, he and his colleagues can be called the harbingers of the culture. (5) Incorrect; a soothsayer would be someone who foresees/ predicts a certain event. Here, Dawkins is accused of advocating the culture. (6) Incorrect; Dawkins cannot be the spoiler of a selfish culture if he is helping set the stage for 'I got mine' culture.

Directions: For the given question, select one entry for the blank from the given choices, to best complete the text.

But in recent years the parallel has taken a less flattering turn. Opinion has long been divided on Bloom. Some regard him as little more than a blowhard, the promulgator - in indigestible prose - of theories both ___________ - a pontificator, a narcissist, a mountebank. Others - by far the majority in the popular press - have anointed him the critic of the age.

  1. vapid and insipid

  2. empty and obscure

  3. extremist and inflammatory

  4. self serving and one-sided

  5. muddled and lackluster


Correct Option: B
Explanation:

(1) Incorrect; the sentence needs a contrast with 'critic of the age'. Since the protagonist is a 'blowhard', it hardly seems likely that his theories will be boring. (2) Correct; at one extreme Bloom is hailed as the greatest critic of the age, it makes sense that the opposite side will have a contrasting view. Another clue comes from the use of 'indigestible prose' which drops a hint about his theories. (3) Incorrect; the clue comes in the use of 'indigestible prose'; the option has to convey a continuity with it. (4) Incorrect; the clue comes in the use of 'indigestible prose'; the option has to convey a continuity with it. (5) Incorrect; the sentence needs a contrast with 'critic of the age'. Since the protagonist is a 'blowhard', it hardly seems likely that his theories will be muddled.

Directions: For the given question, select one entry for the blank from the given choices, to best complete the text.

For the past century or so, philosophy has primarily entailed ___________ deep truths about the nature of human existence - questions about reason, knowledge, values, and free will. Philosophy can seem like a lonely ivory-tower vigil, but the old school holds that sitting and thinking is still the best way to do it.

  1. erudite discussions to ferret out

  2. digging into the human psyche to find out

  3. esoteric contemplation to dig out

  4. altruistic reflection to find out

  5. solitary ruminations to puzzle out


Correct Option: E
Explanation:

(1) Incorrect; the clue comes from 'philosophy can seem like a lonely ivory-tower vigil'. Words that denote a lonely vigil are needed. (2) Incorrect; because philosophy is a 'lonely vigil' and thinking is anyways a solitary pursuit, words that denote this state of mind are needed. (3) Incorrect; nothing in the passage suggests philosophy being hard to understand, which is what esoteric would imply. (4) Incorrect; reflections is correct, but 'altruism' does not fit the passage. (5) Correct; because philosophy is a lonely vigil and entails sitting and thinking, which is also a solitary pursuit, the option neatly sums up the effort required.

Directions: For the given question, select one entry for the blank from the given choices, to best complete the text.

To those who actually knew Socrates, he was not always the beloved master philosopher that Plato writes about; to the ignorant or hostile, he could also appear as ___________, a Sophist.

  1. a mere pretender to the throne

  2. a peddler of useless intellectual tricks

  3. a man of wisdom beyond understanding

  4. a recipient of a pupil's misplaced adoration

  5. an arrogant and narcissistic scholar


Correct Option: B
Explanation:

(1) Incorrect but close; the clue is that Socrates has been referred to as 'master philosopher' and as a 'sophist'. 'Pretender to the throne' only contrasts with the first part, but does not contrast with the second.  (2) Correct; the use of 'sophist' to describe Socrates is a clear clue that some thought that he was not a philosopher but someone who pretended to speak and know of erudite topics. (3) Incorrect; why would people hostile to Socrates credit him with wisdom beyond comprehension? (4) Incorrect; the clue lies in the use of the word 'sophist' to describe Socrates. A sophist is a person who pretends to be sophisticated but is not. (5) Incorrect; the choice of option has to gel with the use of 'sophist' to describe Socrates.

All of the following can be inferred from the passage about Hemingway's style of writing, except

Directions: Answer the given question based on the following passage:

Ernest Hemingway’s style of writing cultivated a mass following for him not only while he was alive but also after his death. Most essayists and critics agree that Hemingway abhorred the use of adjectives and used nouns exhaustively in order to prevent his characters from being bigger than life. Others have accused Hemingway of being rather bland in the description of his characters and transferring the onus onto the readers to build the characters in the way that seems fit to them. Another belief that has emerged about his writing is that he made the characters and their dialogues stay in our heads by laying selective emphasis and by the use of repetition. Hemingway himself acknowledged that he did most of his work in his head and that any sentence, before it could be penned down, had to fit his standards of comprehension and brevity. Hemingway acknowledged that he sometimes felt that his style of writing was more suggestive than direct and that the reader had to involve himself to not miss the subtle nuances of his (Hemingway’s) writings.

  1. Misinterpretation of Hemingway's intent was possible if the reader wasn't attuned to the writing.

  2. Hemingway wanted to leave a certain leeway in the interpretation of his characters.

  3. Hemingway shunned verbosity and clichés.

  4. Hemingway had a way of drawing the attention of the reader towards the nuances of his plots and characters.

  5. Hemingway portrayed his characters as being no mere mortals.


Correct Option: E
Explanation:

(1) Incorrect; Hemingway himself said that reader involvement was necessary so as to not miss the subtle nuances of his writing. (2) Incorrect; Hemingway is quoted as saying that his style of writing was more suggestive than direct. (3) Incorrect; the passage mentions that Hemingway shunned adjectives and his writings had to conform to his standards of brevity. (4) Incorrect; the passage mentions that Hemingway made his characters stay in the readers' heads with the use of selective emphasis and repetition. (5) Correct; since Hemingway shunned adjectives in his writings, and used only nouns, it figures that his characters would not take on grandiose proportions.

In the context of the passage as a whole, “craftsmanship” in sentence 7 is closest in meaning to:

Directions: Answer the given question based on the following passage:

Outsourced healthcare, especially expensive surgeries, is a trend that is catching the fancy of the patients both in the United States and in the United Kingdom. However, the similarity ends here as the reasons for healthcare being outsourced to nations like India are different in the two nations. Patients in USA prefer overseas treatment because of high costs associated with healthcare in the US. Patients in the UK, however, prefer going overseas for surgeries because of a huge backlog of surgeries and the long waiting period.
The United Kingdom operates its healthcare on a model that can best be called a socialist model of cooperation and shared responsibility. The healthcare in the nation is managed by the government by using a portion of the tax collections. The policy is all-inclusive and everyone is entitled to subsidized and sometimes free healthcare, irrespective of the patient’s ability to pay. This leaves room for considerable craftsmanship in the construction of socialist systems. All the employees of the public healthcare system are government employees. Surprisingly, this model of socialist, government run healthcare services has reported a higher satisfaction rate among the patients than the private sector model prevalent in the United States. The socialist model also eliminated the need for a medical insurance industry because of the affordability of treatment. According to one estimate, if America were to move to a socialist healthcare model like that of U.K., Cuba, Switzerland, and were to provide healthcare insurance to all its citizens, the American healthcare industry could still save $100 billion. However, the present scenario is that the healthcare industry is making huge profits even as many in need of medical care suffer.

 

  1. jugglery

  2. sleight-of-hand

  3. ingenuity

  4. adroitness

  5. dexterity


Correct Option: C
Explanation:

(1) Incorrect; the passage talks of how the system can be tweaked to suit the needs of patients who cannot afford to pay for healthcare. This shows that the system is not rigid. A word opposite of rigid is required. (2) Incorrect; sleight-of-hand has a negative connotation, like  trickery. The passage does not suggest a negative connotation about the socialist medical system. (3) Correct; because the system in flexible in allowing healthcare to all irrespective of their ability to pay, a word denoting ‘possibility for tinkering’ is required. Ingenuity fits the purpose. (4) Incorrect; adroitness would suggest expertise while a word suggesting ‘possibility for tinkering’ is required. (5) Incorrect; though a synonym to craftsmanship, dexterity does not fit the sentence as required.

What is the thematic highlight of the passage?

Directions: Answer the given question based on the following passage:

Like ethics, morality, in whatever degree it exists in a mortal, sits rather easy on their wearer’s shoulders. A rascal would perhaps recount with more sadistic glee of having made a sucker out of an unsuspecting soul, than how an upright and honest official would describe his stand against corruption and the efforts to corrupt him. For an ordinary Cuban citizen, trapped in a nation battling international embargoes of all sorts, the contest between morality aided by legality, and the need to stock one’s larder is really a no-show because morality does not fill hungry stomachs. One’s amenability to shedding one’s scruples grows in direct proportion to the shortage of what one is seeking. While an over-fed American, in his native country, might turn his nose up at non-organic lettuce, and choose instead to pick up his vegetables from a store that sells ‘certified organic only’, a sterner test of his resolution would only be possible in a setting when, let’s say, he is staying in Cuba for an year. For a nation which has always been the favored child of abundance, and where power, at least in the ‘pioneer years’ flowed from the barrel of the gun, much has always been there for the asking, and the rest was obtained by force, it is easy to be moral.

  1. Americans are given to pontification on morality because they have it easy.

  2. The only difference between Cuban and American moralities is the degree of abundance.

  3. In a contest between morality and ethics, morality mostly loses.

  4. Ethics and morality are contingent upon circumstances and individuality.


Correct Option: D
Explanation:

(1) Incorrect; the examples of Americans and Cubans are used only to contrast how morality comes easy to those with full tummies. (2) Incorrect; the examples of the two nationalities are used to highlight how morality is contingent on circumstances. (3) Incorrect; ethics are mentioned only in passing, it is morality which is under spotlight in the passage. (4) Correct; the passage mentions how ethics and morality sit easy on the shoulder of the wearer. It also shows how taking a higher moral ground is easy when the circumstances are favorable. (5) Incorrect but close; it presents only part of the picture because individual choice is also mentioned (how an upright…to corrupt him).

Which of the following if true, would most strengthen the conclusion?

Directions: Answer the given question based on the following passage:

Smart people are the catalysts for progress but sometimes they cause immeasurable harm while trying to do good. An eccentric millionaire, Jonathan Holden, living in America in the early 20th century set up a trust that invested two and a half million dollars in a series of trusts at 5% compounding interest. Though such trusts were not uncommon, what was unprecedented about these trusts was that they had a lock-in period of either 500 years or 1000 years. By the time of maturity, it is estimated that the Unitarian Church, one of the beneficiaries of Holden’s generosity will have a wealth of around 25 billion dollars. The State of Pennsylvania, beneficiary of a 1000 years trust, will have a cool $ 425 trillion. The amount of the payout for the State of Pennsylvania, meant by Holden as a tribute to his hero - Benjamin Franklin, and meant to obviate the need for the denizens of the State to ever pay income tax again, might achieve its objective, but would end up bankrupting the United States.

  1. According to many prominent economists, Holden's descendents, the executors of the trust, would own around half of the Fortune-500 companies in the twenty-fifth century.

  2. The Unitarian Church is preaching a rather militant brand of Christianity.

  3. A court has ordered the interest on the accumulated amount to be paid out to the beneficiaries every year.

  4. Fresh calculations have proven that the quantum of payout will be less than one-tenth of the figures earlier estimated.

  5. A recent law has made it mandatory for all trusts, executed at any point in time, to have a maximum term of 200 years.


Correct Option: A
Explanation:

(1) Correct; because they would own half of Fortune 500 companies, they would have a stranglehold on commerce and a monopoly in many sectors. This would be harmful for the world economy as a whole. (2) Incorrect; though the consequences of militant religion would be bad, there is a better, a more all-encompassing reason available. (3) Incorrect; this would mean that the money would not compound further, and the yearly payouts will preclude the possibility of a global meltdown 500 or 1000 years later. (4) Incorrect; this will weaken the conclusion. (5) Incorrect; this will mean that the interest payable to the trusts possibly would not compound to the extent that it will become enough to have catastrophic consequences for U.S. or the world economy.

In the context of the passage as a whole, “amenability” in sentence 5 is closest in meaning to

Directions: Answer the given question based on the following passage:

Like ethics, morality, in whatever degree it exists in a mortal, sits rather easy on their wearer’s shoulders. A rascal would perhaps recount with more sadistic glee of having made a sucker out of an unsuspecting soul, than how an upright and honest official would describe his stand against corruption and the efforts to corrupt him. For an ordinary Cuban citizen, trapped in a nation battling international embargoes of all sorts, the contest between morality aided by legality, and the need to stock one’s larder is really a no-show because morality does not fill hungry stomachs. One’s amenability to shedding one’s scruples grows in direct proportion to the shortage of what one is seeking. While an over-fed American, in his native country, might turn his nose up at non-organic lettuce, and choose instead to pick up his vegetables from a store that sells ‘certified organic only’, a sterner test of his resolution would only be possible in a setting when, let’s say, he is staying in Cuba for an year. For a nation which has always been the favored child of abundance, and where power, at least in the ‘pioneer years’ flowed from the barrel of the gun, much has always been there for the asking, and the rest was obtained by force, it is easy to be moral.

  1. inclination

  2. desire

  3. receptiveness to the idea

  4. helplessness

  5. lack of resistance


Correct Option: E
Explanation:

(1) Incorrect; inclination would mean an in-born tendency. Here, the word is used to convey acceptance rather than inclination. (2) Incorrect; desire would mean that one wants to do it; the word is used more to convey a lack of resistance. (3) Incorrect but very close. One, there is a better option in E, and two, if substituted for the original sentence, it would be idiomatically incorrect. (4) Incorrect; helplessness would mean no choice at all. The word conveys a choice made because it made things easy. (5) Correct; because one is seeking something, the need would inversely proportionate resistance to doing something unscrupulous.

In the argument given, the two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?

Directions: Answer the given question based on the following passage:

Outsourced healthcare, especially expensive surgeries, is a trend that is catching the fancy of the patients both in the United States and in the United Kingdom. However, the similarity ends here as the reasons for healthcare being outsourced to nations like India are different in the two nations. Patients in USA prefer overseas treatment because of high costs associated with healthcare in the US. Patients in the UK, however, prefer going overseas for surgeries because of a huge backlog of surgeries and the long waiting period.
The United Kingdom operates its healthcare on a model that can best be called a socialist model of cooperation and shared responsibility. The healthcare in the nation is managed by the government by using a portion of the tax collections. The policy is all-inclusive and everyone is entitled to subsidized and sometimes free healthcare, irrespective of the patient’s ability to pay. This leaves room for considerable craftsmanship in the construction of socialist systems. All the employees of the public healthcare system are government employees. Surprisingly, this model of socialist, government run healthcare services has reported a higher satisfaction rate among the patients than the private sector model prevalent in the United States. The socialist model also eliminated the need for a medical insurance industry because of the affordability of treatment. According to one estimate, if America were to move to a socialist healthcare model like that of U.K., Cuba, Switzerland, and were to provide healthcare insurance to all its citizens, the American healthcare industry could still save $100 billion. However, the present scenario is that the healthcare industry is making huge profits even as many in need of medical care suffer.

 

  1. The first sentence lists a piece of evidence while the second sentence provides the conclusion to the argument.

  2. Both sentences provide intermediate conclusions to the argument.

  3. The first sentence lists a probable cause for the effect listed in sentence two.

  4. The second sentence lists a possible cause for the effect listed in sentence one.

  5. Both list possible causes for a conclusion drawn later in the passage.


Correct Option: D
Explanation:

(1) Incorrect; the first sentence is a premise but the second sentence is not the conclusion to the argument. (2) Incorrect; both statements provide premises rather than conclusions.  (3) Incorrect; the first is more likely to be the outcome of the situation suggested in the second sentence. (4) Correct; the second sentence states a premise that healthcare is available to all in UK, irrespective of their ability to pay. The first sentence could be a possible outcome of this policy; because everyone is entitled to healthcare, there is a long waiting period. (5) Incorrect; the conclusion is about the American healthcare industry while both the sentences are about healthcare policies of UK.

What is the role of the last sentence, 'For a nation which has always been the favored child of abundance, and where power, at least in the 'pioneer years' flowed from the barrel of the gun, much has always been there for the asking, and the rest could be obtained by force, it is easy to be moral' in the passage?

Directions: Answer the given question based on the following passage:

Like ethics, morality, in whatever degree it exists in a mortal, sits rather easy on their wearer’s shoulders. A rascal would perhaps recount with more sadistic glee of having made a sucker out of an unsuspecting soul, than how an upright and honest official would describe his stand against corruption and the efforts to corrupt him. For an ordinary Cuban citizen, trapped in a nation battling international embargoes of all sorts, the contest between morality aided by legality, and the need to stock one’s larder is really a no-show because morality does not fill hungry stomachs. One’s amenability to shedding one’s scruples grows in direct proportion to the shortage of what one is seeking. While an over-fed American, in his native country, might turn his nose up at non-organic lettuce, and choose instead to pick up his vegetables from a store that sells ‘certified organic only’, a sterner test of his resolution would only be possible in a setting when, let’s say, he is staying in Cuba for an year. For a nation which has always been the favored child of abundance, and where power, at least in the ‘pioneer years’ flowed from the barrel of the gun, much has always been there for the asking, and the rest was obtained by force, it is easy to be moral.

  1. The author uses the sentence to paint a rather derogatory picture of Americans.

  2. It logically concludes the point that the author is trying to make in the argument.

  3. It is used to give an example of the various hues of morality.

  4. It is used to provide an example of the metamorphosis of morality under various stimuli.

  5. The author uses it to convey his scarcely concealed admiration for the Americans.


Correct Option: D
Explanation:

(1) Incorrect but close; the author uses the examples of Americans and Cubans only to highlight how morality changes based on circumstance. The sentence is a reference to Americans living in the 'lap of plenty' and how what they didn't have, they grabbed. Hence, it was easy for them to be moralistic. (2) Incorrect; the conclusion is in the first sentence. The last sentence serves to support the conclusion. (3) Incorrect but close; the sentence is less about hues of morality, more about the ease in taking higher moral ground when one has all that one needs. (4) Correct; the author describes how Americans find it easy to take the higher moral ground because they live in abundance. Also, the sentence highlights how, when faced with the want of something, grabbing it from someone to satisfy the need, makes it easy to overlook one's foibles and take a higher moral ground. (5) Incorrect; the author uses the example of Americans to show how it is easy to take a higher moral ground when one does not want for anything. 

Which of the following explains the most likely reason for the happiness of the residents of the author's building?

Directions: Answer the given question based on the following passage:

The residents of my building are very happy as many other old buildings in our, the older part of the city, are undergoing redevelopment. Residents of the buildings that are undergoing redevelopment are happy as the builders not only demolish and rebuild the buildings, but also provide more covered space and in-building parking to the residents once the building is reconstructed. In return, the builders usually keep the ground floor of the new building as their fee and develop it as a showroom or other commercial space.

  1. The redeveloped buildings will no longer be an eyesore on the beauty of the old city.

  2. The opening of new showrooms would mean a better shopping experience for the residents of the old city and those of the author's building.

  3. The residents are hopeful that some builder will target their building also for redevelopment.

  4. More commercial space would mean increased employment opportunities for the residents of the old city.

  5. In-building parking would mean less congestion on the streets and roads of the old city.


Correct Option: C
Explanation:

(1) Incorrect; though it is possible, it is not the best answer. Also, it cannot be inferred with surety that the residents of the author's building appreciate beauty or beautiful surroundings. (2) Incorrect; possible, but not the best answer. (3) Correct; because many buildings are undergoing redevelopment in the old part of the town where the author also lives, it is very probable that the building that the author lives in is also old. Hence, the reason for the happiness of the residents of his buildings can be that they are also anticipating a redevelopment offer by one of the builders. (4) Incorrect; though possible, it is not the best possible answer. (5) Incorrect; the clue lies in the fact that many 'other' buildings are undergoing redevelopment. That fact points towards the author's building also being old. The reason has to point towards that fact.

- Hide questions