0

Logical Reasoning - Argumentation 2

Description: CAT WALK EU - CAT WALK EU - A Multiple Choice Type Test to Improve Your Knowledge and Skills in Passing Competitive for CAT 2011 Preparation
Number of Questions: 25
Created by:
Tags: CAT WALK EU MBA Entrance MCA Entrance CAT 2011 Argument/Assumption/Implication Assumption Decision Making Logical Reasoning Sentence Completion Sentence Completion (Gap Fills) Reasoning Verbal Reasoning
Attempted 0/25 Correct 0 Score 0

Directions: In the following question, an incomplete statement is provided. You have to select the option which most logically completes the idea in the question statement.

An act of justice closes the book on a misdeed; an act of vengeance _________.

  1. writes one of its own

  2. opens new books

  3. reopens the first chapter

  4. writes an epilogue

  5. brings forth the pay back


Correct Option: A
Explanation:

The answer option presents a contrast. Vengeance is opposite of justice. Vengeance opens, justice settles. Hence, this is the correct answer.

Directions: In the following question, an incomplete statement is provided. You have to select the option which most logically completes the idea in the question statement.

This is about _________ a sociological analysis can penetrate.

  1. as far as

  2. the outer limit that

  3. just how far into the subject

  4. just the relative distance that

  5. the extent to which


Correct Option: A
Explanation:

(3) and (4) can be eliminated because of the usage of 'just'. Even (2) does not make coherent sense. Out of (1) and (5), (1) is a better fit.

Directions: In the following question, an incomplete statement is provided. You have to select the option which most logically completes the idea in the question statement.

The highest reward for a man's toil is not what he gets for it but what _________.

  1. he makes out of it

  2. he gets for others

  3. he has overcome through it

  4. he becomes by it

  5. he thinks he deserves


Correct Option: D
Explanation:

The only choice is between (1) and (4). It is not what a man makes out of a reward, but what the effort itself makes him.

Directions: The statement below is followed by five others. Select the one which most complements the idea contained in the given statement.

On the one hand, capitalism requires the engine of self interest of greed, if you will while on the other hand, society requires attention to the general interest, the ________.

  1. supremacy of the collective engine of interest

  2. taming of greed

  3. socialistic concept of greed

  4. transformation of greed and animosity

  5. compatibility of individual and collective good


Correct Option: B
Explanation:

On the one hand, it provides a contrast. The blank ought to sustain the contrast. Hence, (2): 'Greed' and 'taming of greed'.

Directions: The statement below is followed by five others. Select the one which most complements the idea contained in the given statement.

Basically, we like the free market only as long as the trend is up. _________.

  1. We refuse to see the long term benefits of the downward trend.

  2. What we need to cultivate is an attitude of equanimity.

  3. We forget for the moment that the things will pick up.

  4. As soon as the inevitable downturn occurs, we complain bitterly and expect the government to fix the things.

  5. The sooner the downward trends appear, our moods register a downturn too.


Correct Option: D
Explanation:

'Only as long as' also helps us predict that the same is not true as soon as the position gets reversed. The choice is only between (4) and (5), but (5) is rendered incorrect by the use of 'The sooner'.

Directions: The statement below is followed by five others. Select the one which most complements the idea contained in the given statement.

The illusion that times that were are better than those that are _________.

  1. shatters our belief in future

  2. has probably pervaded all ages

  3. makes our lives miserable

  4. often gives us hope and peace

  5. is based more on hearsay than on facts


Correct Option: B
Explanation:

The only real choice is between (2) and (5).  On a closer scrutiny, (2) appears more logical. This has been an illusion through the ages.

Directions: The statement below is followed by five others. Select the one which most complements the idea contained in the given statement.

Since children are less convenient to manipulate than guinea pigs, _________.

  1. educational research is often short of hard data

  2. doctors have to depend more on the latter than the former

  3. the latter have to pay the price for the former's intransigence

  4. the research findings from the latter source are generally considered to be more reliable than that obtained from the former

  5. child psychologists are often compelled to use more data obtained from the latter sources


Correct Option: E
Explanation:

The comparison is between two sources of data. Since one is inconvenient, the second is relied upon.

Directions: The statement below is followed by five others. Select the one which most complements the idea contained in the given statement.

Since they first became part of living room furniture, television remote controls have become the advertiser's scourge. Some analysts reckon that _________.

  1. the instruments will make TV advertising completely ineffective

  2. as many as a third of all ads are zapped by viewers

  3. the instrument greatly interferes with the watching of wholesome TV programmes

  4. soon the advertising industry will have no option but to approach the government to ban the instrument

  5. there ought to be advertisements to coax the viewers out of the frequent use of remote controls


Correct Option: B
Explanation:

'The advertiser's scourge is the clue. 'If the viewers change the channel during ads, it becomes a menace for advertisers. This results in the remote control becoming a scourge for the advertisers. Hence, (2) is the most appropriate answer choice.

Directions: The statement below is followed by five others. Select the one which most complements the idea contained in the given statement.

Language is the dress of thought;

  1. it is the thought that gives coherent shape to your language

  2. the former covers the latter

  3. the former providing words to the latter

  4. the expression revealed by the language

  5. every time you talk your mind is on parade


Correct Option: E
Explanation:

Dress is the outer appearance of a person. Likewise, language or our talk puts our mind on parade or show. This is coherent to the first part and makes it the correct answer choice.

Directions: In the following question, an incomplete statement is provided which is most logically completed by one of the given options. Select the appropriate option.

The European Economic Community will be a major threat to the

  1. hegemony of the US

  2. economic supremacy and power of the US

  3. development of indigenous Indian industry

  4. future German domination of Europe

  5. free Trade Areas across Asia and Americas


Correct Option: B
Explanation:

EEC is an economic community. So, it can only be an economic threat. And it can be a major threat mainly to the dominant force. Hence, (2) is correct.

Directions: The statement below is followed by five others. Select the one which most complements the idea contained in the given statement.

If the society is organised as a political entity, elections and other political processes will tend to exacerbate conflict;

  1. but this will happen only when we indulge in politics of division

  2. social and cultural divisions get sharpened under tutelage of the political masters

  3. that is perhaps an inadvertent price we have to pay for democracy

  4. properly directed they could be used to reduce it

  5. that is perhaps why autocracies have better conflict management


Correct Option: D
Explanation:

Note that the given part of the sentence ends with a semicolon. This means that the missing part should restate or illustrate the argument or present an opposite view. (3) and (5) need to begin as new sentences. (1) needs only a comma. (2) is irrelevant.

Directions: The statement below is followed by five others. Select the one which most complements the idea contained in the given statement.

The miserable salaries provided to the general Indian service class

  1. are well defined as per the constitution of India

  2. are balanced through the total job security

  3. are never a cause for concern to anybody

  4. are very miserable and pathetic

  5. are reflective of their performance


Correct Option: C
Explanation:

The occurrence of the word 'miserable' in the given part of sentence helps us understand that the second part of sentence shall not have anything positive regarding salaries. Thus, automatically options (2) and (5) can be rejected. Option (4) is syntactically incorrect and non-sensical. Options (1) and (3), both are grammatically correct, but option (3) is more valid as it more closely represents the idea.

Directions: In the following question, an incomplete statement is provided which is most logically completed by one of the given options. Select the appropriate option.

Disinvestment of government's equity in the public sector is a very important step that could

  1. propel India to faster economic growth

  2. create a synergistic industrial climate

  3. lead to greater emphasis on productivity and profitability

  4. change the complacent work policies and attitudes in the public sector

  5. free capital locked up in unproductive investments


Correct Option: C
Explanation:

(1) and (2) are far fetched. (5) is extreme. (3) does not talk of public sector at all.

Directions: Sometimes we conclude about characteristics of a general phenomenon by studying or analysing characteristics of a particular phenomenon. Below are given such inductive arguments. The generalisation is given first, followed by a particular statement. You have to find out whether the numbered particular statement strongly confirms, vaguely hints, strongly contradicts or is irrelevant to the generalisation. Read the question given below and answer accordingly. Generalisation: People are most likely to feel sympathy for those animals whose faces are most like human faces.

  1. People feel a lot of sympathy for chimpanzees.
  2. People feel a lot of sympathy for parakeets. What type of support does statement 2 provide for this generalisation?
  1. Strongly confirms

  2. Vaguely hints

  3. Strongly contradicts

  4. Vaguely contradicts

  5. Irrelevant


Correct Option: C
Explanation:

Parakeets don't look like humans. Even then they have people's sympathies. Still this does not negate the generalisation, though it hints vaguely against it.

Directions: Sometimes we conclude about characteristics of a general phenomenon by studying or analysing characteristics of a particular phenomenon. Below are given such inductive arguments. The generalisation is given first, followed by a particular statement. You have to find out whether the numbered particular statement strongly confirms, vaguely hints, strongly contradicts or is irrelevant to the generalisation. Read the question given below and answer accordingly.

Generalisation: Professors with tenure don't work as hard as professors without tenure.

  1. The possibility of losing one's job is an incentive to work hard.
  2. Professor Smith, who is tenured, works 14 hours a day. What type of support does statement (2) provide for this generalisation?
  1. Strongly confirms

  2. Vaguely hints

  3. Strongly contradicts

  4. Vaguely contradicts

  5. Irrelevant


Correct Option: C
Explanation:

By citing an example of a professor with tenure who works hard (14 hours out of 24), the statement directly contradicts the generalisation. Hence, this is the correct answer choice.

Directions: Sometimes we conclude about characteristics of a general phenomenon by studying or analysing characteristics of a particular phenomenon. Below are given such inductive arguments. The generalisation is given first, followed by a particular statement. You have to find out whether the numbered particular statement strongly confirms, vaguely hints, strongly contradicts or is irrelevant to the generalisation. Read the question given below and answer accordingly. Generalisation: Expensive clothes are always made of natural fabrics.

  1. I have never seen a $500 men's suit made of polyester or other synthetic material.
  2. I sometimes see silk blouses at very low prices. What type of support does statement 1 provide for this generalisation?
  1. Strongly confirms

  2. Vaguely hints

  3. Strongly contradicts

  4. Vaguely contradicts

  5. Irrelevant


Correct Option: E
Explanation:

The fact that the author has never seen a costly suit made of these non-natural fabrics, doesn't rule out its existence. There is also no specific mention of value that corresponds to 'expensive'. Hence, (5) is the correct answer choice.

Directions: Sometimes we conclude about characteristics of a general phenomenon by studying or analysing characteristics of a particular phenomenon. Below are given such inductive arguments. The generalisation is given first, followed by a particular statement. You have to find out whether the numbered particular statement strongly confirms, vaguely hints, strongly contradicts or is irrelevant to the generalisation. Read the question given below and answer accordingly.

Generalisation: A red sun in the evening means good weather the next day.

  1. The prevailing winds come from the west.
  2. The sun was red last night but it's raining today. What type of support does statement 1 provide for this generalisation?
  1. Strongly confirms

  2. Vaguely hints

  3. Strongly contradicts

  4. Vaguely contradicts

  5. Irrelevant


Correct Option: E
Explanation:

The direction of the wind cannot be understood from the statement. Therefore, (5) is the correct answer choice. 

Directions: In making decisions about important question, it is desirable to be able to distinguish between 'strong' arguments and 'weak' arguments so far as they relate to the question. 'Strong' arguments must be both important and directly related to the questions. 'Weak' arguments may not be directly related to the question. The question below is followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments is a 'strong' argument and which is a 'weak' argument.

Give answer (1) if only argument I is strong; give answer (2) if only argument II is strong; give answer (3) if either I or II is strong; give answer (4) if neither I nor II is strong; and give answer (5) if both I and II are strong.

Should India allow the multinationals to explore the resources available under sea in its vast economic zone? Arguments: I. Yes. India does not have enough technical and financial resources to conduct such explorations. II. No. This will endanger the sovereign status of the country.

  1. (1)

  2. (2)

  3. (3)

  4. (4)

  5. (5)


Correct Option: A
Explanation:

I is strong. But II is also strong because it explains long time effect of letting the multinationals explore the resources under Indian waters. Therefore, (1) cannot be the right answer choice.

Directions: In question below a statement is given followed by two conclusions numbered I and II. You have to assume everything in the statement to be true, then consider the two conclusions together and decide which of them logically follows beyond a reasonable doubt from the information given in the statement.

The citizen's forum wants to unite tax-paying citizens and to make them aware of their right to lead quality civic life. I. Till this time the citizens were neither united nor much aware of their rights as tax-paying citizens. II. Quality civic life is not possible for tax paying citizens in a country.

  1. If only conclusion I follows

  2. If only conclusion II follows

  3. If either conclusion I or II follows

  4. If both the conclusions follow

  5. If neither of the conclusions follow


Correct Option: A
Explanation:

 I is definitely the conclusion because only something that is not united can be united. But II is illogical. The need for uniting doesn't mean that without uniting people cannot lead quality civic life. Hence, (1) is the correct choice.

Directions: In making decisions about important question, it is desirable to be able to distinguish between 'strong' arguments and 'weak' arguments so far as they relate to the question. 'Strong' arguments must be both important and directly related to the question. 'Weak' arguments may not be directly related to the question. The question below is followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments is a 'strong' argument and which is a 'weak' argument.

Give answer (1) if only argument I is strong; give answer (2) if only argument II is strong; give answer (3) if either I or II is strong; give answer (4) if neither I nor II is strong; and give answer (5) if both I and II are strong.

Should the private companies be allowed to operate passenger train services in India? Arguments: I. Yes. This will improve the quality of service in Indian Railways and it will be faced with severe competition. II. No. The private companies may not agree to operate in the non-profitable sectors.

  1. (1)

  2. (2)

  3. (3)

  4. (4)

  5. (5)


Correct Option: A
Explanation:

I is correct because it presents a reasonable explanation to the situation. On the other hand, II presents an unjustifiable assumption that train services are a non-profitable sector. Even otherwise policy guidelines can be framed to ensure private responsibility. Hence, only I is correct.

Directions: In the following question, a statement is followed by two assumptions I and II. You are to consider the statement and the assumptions that follow and decide which of the assumptions is/are implicit in the statement. Give the answer as

(1) if only I is implicit (2) if only II is implicit (3) if both I and II are implicit (4) if neither I nor II is implicit (5) if either I alone or II alone is implicit

Statement: Keep your tongue and your temper in control. Rakesh is a person of few words. Assumptions: I. Rakesh does not lose his temper. II. Rakesh has control over his tongue.

  1. (1)

  2. (2)

  3. (3)

  4. (4)

  5. (5)


Correct Option: B
Explanation:

The statement does not say anything about Rakesh’s temper, only about his being laconic.

Directions: In the following question, a statement is followed by two assumptions I and II. You are to consider the statement and the assumptions that follow and decide which of the assumptions is/are implicit in the statement. Give the answer as

(1) if only I is implicit (2) if only II is implicit (3) if both I and II are implicit (4) if neither I nor II is implicit (5) if either I alone or II alone is implicit

Statement: Population limitation follows economic prosperity automatically. Assumptions: I. Poor people are against population control. II. Economic prosperity spares no time to individuals for family activities.

  1. (1)

  2. (2)

  3. (3)

  4. (4)

  5. (5)


Correct Option: D
Explanation:

Neither assumption can be inferred. The first statement is nowhere related to the relation between economic prosperity (cause) and population limitation (effect). The second statement has gone way out of the scope. Limitation is not due to paucity of time at disposal. Hence, this (neither is implicit) is the correct answer choice.

Directions: The statement given below is followed by two assumptions I and II. You are to consider the statement and the assumptions that follow and decide which of the assumptions is/are implicit in the statement. Give answer.

(1) if only I is implicit (2) if only II is implicit (3) if both I and II are implicit (4) if neither I nor II is implicit (5) if either I alone or II alone is implicit Statement: Spicy food damages the liver. The patient is advised to take a liver tonic. Assumptions: I. The patient takes spicy food. II. A healthy liver is necessary to digest food.

  1. (1)

  2. (2)

  3. (3)

  4. (4)

  5. (5)


Correct Option: A
Explanation:

Only I is implicit because the statement assumes that the patient has been taking spicy food. Therefore, his liver is damaged and he is advised to take a liver tonic. Statement II is not implicit because we cannot infer that liver is a digestive organ or non-digestive organ.

Directions: In the following question, a statement is followed by two assumptions I and II. You are to consider the statement and the assumptions that follow and decide which of the assumptions is/are implicit in the statement. Give answer

(1) if only I is implicit (2) if only II is implicit (3) if both I and II are implicit (4) if neither I nor II is implicit (5) if either I alone or II alone is implicit

Statement: The first step in treating addicts is to re-establish their lost ties, for which a continuous personal attention should be paid to the addicts under treatment. Assumptions: I. Addicts under treatment respond better when shown personal interest. II. Addiction and strained relationships are intimately connected.

  1. (1)

  2. (2)

  3. (3)

  4. (4)

  5. (5)


Correct Option: C
Explanation:

Something gains acceptability only if it has shown results in past. Here, the first statement signifies the proof that showing personal interest, benefits the addicts. Also, if something is related to a problem and has a role in treating the same, it gets prescribed. Here, both I and II are implicit and therefore, (3) is the correct answer choice.

Directions: In the following question, a statement is followed by two assumptions I and II. You are to consider the statement and the assumptions that follow and decide which of the assumptions is/are implicit in the statement. Give the answer as

(1) If both I and II are implicit (2) If only II is implicit (3) If only I is implicit (4) If neither I nor II is implicit (5) If either I alone or II alone is implicit

Statement: Happiness is to be shared. Unhappy people suffer. Assumptions: I. Unhappy people share sufferings. II. Happy people do not suffer.

  1. (1)

  2. (2)

  3. (3)

  4. (4)

  5. (5)


Correct Option: C
Explanation:

Only I is implicit, II is not. As per the statement 'happiness is to be shared,' means happiness whether it is happy or unhappy has to be shared. Happy people share their happiness, whereas unhappy people share their sufferings. Unhappy people suffer’ doesn’t mean happy people do not suffer.

- Hide questions