To answer this question, you need to understand the concept of "dynamic file include" mechanisms in web applications and the attack techniques used to exploit them.

Option A) Dynamic File Attack - This option is incorrect because "dynamic file attack" is not a recognized attack technique used to exploit "dynamic file include" mechanisms in web applications.

Option B) Remote File Inclusion - This option is correct because "remote file inclusion" is a common attack technique used to exploit "dynamic file include" mechanisms in web applications. It involves an attacker including a remote file into a web application, which can allow them to execute malicious code or gain unauthorized access.

Option C) Dynamic Data Attack - This option is incorrect because "dynamic data attack" is not a recognized attack technique used to exploit "dynamic file include" mechanisms in web applications.

Option D) Data Dynamics - This option is incorrect because "data dynamics" is not a recognized attack technique used to exploit "dynamic file include" mechanisms in web applications.

The correct answer is B) Remote File Inclusion. This option is correct because "remote file inclusion" is a well-known attack technique used to exploit "dynamic file include" mechanisms in web applications.

• Thanks
• Wrong explanation

To answer this question, you need to understand what static code analysis is.

Static code analysis is a method of analyzing software code without actually executing the binaries resulting from this code. It involves examining the code itself to identify potential issues, such as coding errors, security vulnerabilities, or non-compliance with coding standards.

Let's go through each option to understand why it is correct or incorrect:

Option A) Static Code Analysis is the analysis of software code by actually executing the binaries resulting from this code - This option is incorrect because static code analysis does not involve executing binaries. It focuses on analyzing the code itself.

Option B) Static Code Analysis is the analysis of software code without actually executing the binaries resulting from this code - This option is correct because it accurately describes static code analysis.

Option C) Static Code Analysis is the analysis of executables resulting from this code - This option is incorrect because static code analysis is performed on the source code before it is compiled into executables.

Option D) None of the above - This option is incorrect because option B is the correct answer.

The correct answer is B) Static Code Analysis is the analysis of software code without actually executing the binaries resulting from this code.

• Thanks
• Wrong explanation

To answer this question, you need to understand threat modeling and different methodologies used for it.

Threat modeling is a systematic approach used to identify, evaluate, and mitigate potential threats to a system or application. It helps in understanding and managing the risks associated with a system.

Let's go through each option to understand why it is correct or incorrect:

Option A) STRIDE - This option is correct because STRIDE is a valid threat modeling methodology. STRIDE stands for Spoofing, Tampering, Repudiation, Information disclosure, Denial of service, and Elevation of privilege. It is a framework that helps in identifying and categorizing threats based on these six categories.

Option B) PRIDE - This option is incorrect because PRIDE is not a valid threat modeling methodology. It is not commonly used or recognized in the field of threat modeling.

Option C) BRIDE - This option is incorrect because BRIDE is not a valid threat modeling methodology. It is not commonly used or recognized in the field of threat modeling.

Option D) RIDE - This option is incorrect because RIDE is not a valid threat modeling methodology. It is not commonly used or recognized in the field of threat modeling.

The correct answer is Option A) STRIDE. This option is correct because STRIDE is a widely recognized and used threat modeling methodology.

• Thanks
• Wrong explanation

To answer this question, you need to understand the NOP sled technique and its purpose.

The NOP sled technique is a popular technique used in buffer overflow attacks.

A buffer overflow attack occurs when a program or system tries to store more data in a buffer than it was designed to hold. This can lead to the overwriting of adjacent memory locations, allowing an attacker to execute arbitrary code or take control of the system.

In a buffer overflow attack, the attacker injects malicious code into a buffer, and then overwrites the return address of a function with the address of the injected code. However, it can be challenging to precisely locate the injected code's address, especially if the buffer's size is not known.

This is where the NOP sled technique comes into play. NOP stands for "no operation," which is a type of instruction that does nothing when executed. The NOP sled is a long sequence of NOP instructions placed before the injected code. When the buffer overflow occurs, the execution flow will slide down the NOP sled until it reaches the injected code. This technique increases the chances of hitting the injected code's address, even if the exact location is not known.

Therefore, the correct answer is B) Buffer Overflow Attack Technique, as the NOP sled technique is commonly used in buffer overflow attacks.

• Thanks
• Wrong explanation