(1) This is correct as the sentence conveys that the two statements are poles apart. If, on the one hand anarchy is mentioned, its opposite can be derived from 'passivity' and 'stoicism'. (2) This is incorrect as the sentence contrasts the two statements. If one statement is about anarchy, the other should logically speak of its opposite. 'Brashness' or 'overconfidence' is not antonyms of anarchism. (3) This is incorrect as 'hooliganism' and 'destructiveness' would be analogous to anarchy while the sentence implies a contrast with anarchy. (4) This is incorrect as the sentence contrasts the two statements. If one statement is about anarchy, the other should logically speak of its opposite. 'Brashness' or 'overconfidence' is not antonyms of anarchism. (5) This is correct as the sentence conveys that the two statements are poles apart. If, on the one hand anarchy is mentioned, its opposite can be derived from 'passivity' and 'stoicism'. (6) This is incorrect as 'hooliganism' and 'destructiveness' would be analogous to anarchy while the sentence implies a contrast with anarchy.

(1) This is incorrect simply because there is no matching word for it. (2) This is correct as the sentence implies that manufacturers of digital technology react in a certain manner to creative attempts to reformat the product. 'Dedicated' supplies the reason why they might resist the tweaking. Also, it finds a similar word in 'specific'. (3) This is incorrect, even though it has a matching word in 'prosaic', because it fails to address why manufacturers would resist creative attempts to modify product performance. (4) This is incorrect simply because there is no matching word for it. (5) This is correct as the sentence implies that manufacturers of digital technology react in a certain manner to creative attempts to reformat the product. 'Specific' supplies the reason why they might resist the tweaking. Also, it finds a similar word in 'dedicated'. (6) This is incorrect, even though it has a matching word in 'monotonous', because it fails to address why manufacturers would resist creative attempts to modify product performance.