Option (1): True belief can only mean conviction or certitude. So, the answer is (1). Option (2): A true believer need not be dogmatic. But he will surely have certitude. Option (3): Credence is to put faith on somebody else's statement or an explanation, which cannot be derived from the text. Option (4): 'Softness' doesn't make any sense in context. Option (5): 'Assurance' might fit in coherently, but not 'reassurance'.

(1) The text talks about all organs performing their duty unheeded. Note the thought reverser ‘let’. ‘Support’ does not support the context.

(2) The sign of good health is every organ working in its place; any organ sounding out is derangement. Note the thought reverser ‘let’. Announce is to ‘sound out’.

(3) The word ‘explain’ is more appropriate in context of concepts, not involved in this case.

(4) If one organ announces to be separate, there is no displacement; there is derangement of health.

(5) Any organ speaking out is a sign of health problem or derangement.

(6) ‘Orderliness’ is the opposite of our prediction.

(1) What follow the blank are parts, not groups. Fragmenting the art is the opposite of grouping. (2) United they stand; divided they fall. It is as true of artwork as it is of body organs. You can't divide these into 'Parts'. (3) What follow the blank are parts, not groups. We divide into parts not in areas. (4) The fragmentation completely destroys or annihilates the work. (5) The fragmentation completely destroys; it does not extirpate or root out. (6) The fragmentation completely destroys; it does not 'only disrupt'.

Option (1): 'Since there is no conjunction of contrast, a positive development should follow 'congenial journey'. 'Musty food' makes sense. So, (1) is incorrect. Option (2): Since there is no conjunction of contrast, a positive development should follow 'congenial journey'. 'Congenial' and 'terrible' are almost antonymous. Option (3): Since there is no conjunction of contrast, a positive development should follow 'congenial journey'. 'Palatable food' makes sense. The journey was good, and so was the food. Option (4): Since there is no conjunction of contrast, a positive development should follow 'congenial journey'. 'Frightful food' makes no sense in context. Option (5): 'Wholesome' appears quite close, but healthfulness of food is rather out of context. Nice journey, nice (palatable) food.

Option (1): The vase fell down and broke into pieces 'Knock down' fits well for the ball knocking the vase down. So, the answer is (1). Option (2): 'Overthrew it down' is inconsistent, ungrammatical and illogical. Option (3): Hit it 'down' is ungrammatical. Option (4): Punched is not appropriate word to express that the ball hit the vase as humans can punch or give a blow or holes can be punched. Thus, the option is ruled out. Option (5): 'Whacked' means striking with a blow. A ball cannot whack things down, humans can.

(1) The word ‘breeds’ is the correct idiomatic twin for unemployment..

(2) The word initiates refers to bring into practice or use and is inappropriate.

(3) The word ‘impacts’ does not show what unemployment does to society.

(4) Vulnerable is the correct answer. It refers to prone to or helpless.

(5) ‘Many’ is indefinite and undefined.

(6) ‘Plebians’ is a little restrictive. ‘Vulnerable makes better sense.

(1) I am relaxed in a situation not relaxed with object. (2) If we have come across the object earlier and may come across again, we are acquainted. I am familiar with the word or topic. (3) 'Aware with' is ungrammatical. Correct usage is 'aware of' or ''acquainted with'. (4) There is no doubt; there is only the occasion or opportunity. (5) There is no problem; there is only the occasion or opportunity. (6) Occasion is the correct answer which refers to the correct time or apt moment.

(1) Read the sentence carefully; note the clue words like 'unthinkable' and 'illogical' and the conjunction of contrast 'but'. The opposite of 'unthinkable' and 'illogical' should be 'acceptable'. (2) Two completely opposite statements may be 'acceptable, but not 'consistent'. (3) Note that we are not only aware but also want to relive our beautiful dreams; the passage is not talking about beautiful dreams but 'opposite statement' 'unthinkable' yet 'side by side'. (4) Two completely opposite statements may be 'acceptable' in dreams but not in waking state. (5) Note that things which are nice might not be acceptable. (6) Distinctly (adverb) does not even fit in syntactically.

Option (1): 'Capital' is recovered, not revived. Option (2): You take your chances, not revive your chances. Option (3): Last ditch attempt to revive one's fluke' is illogical and ungrammatical. Option (4): 'Last ditch attempt' is the catch phrase here and it is about 'reviving'. 'A last ditch attempt' has been made to revive the fortunes, in spite of the bleak situation as far as television is concerned. So ans. has to be (4). Option (5): One tries one's luck. 'Revive one's luck' is ungrammatical.

Option (1): If famine seems to be a reality, then tinkering or trifling with it will not matter. Option (2): Depleting appropriately fits in the blank, as depletion will lead to the 'night' (adverse situation) of a famine. So, (2) is the best possible answer. Option (3): Who is 'losing'? 'Being lost' might yet have fitted in. Hence, the option can be easily eliminated. Option (4): 'Forest cover is exhausting' is ungrammatical. 'Getting exhausted' might yes fit in. Option (5): 'Denuding' does not fit in syntactically. 'Being denuded' would have been correct grammatical usage.

(1) The policy makers preach free market to the farmers only as long as it suits the former. They never ‘shirk’ from preaching.

(2) ‘Learn’ from preaching makes no sense.

(4) Restrain though is a close option choice but it still does not quite mean ‘desist’.

(4)  They don’t turn green with envy or red with anger.

(5) The policy makers preach free market to the farmers only as long as it suits the former. If it does not, they will turn the other way and become protectionist.

(6) They don’t turn green with envy or red with anger.