Option (1) is correct: A is liable as he may not know that B has a duplicate key in his possession.

Option (1) is incorrect: It is not against the police excesses. Option (2) is incorrect: It is not against damaging the dignity of a person.

Option (3) is correct: Scienti non fit injuria, which means that only knowledge of the risk is not enough to claim defence, there must be acceptance to undergo the results of the risk undertaken. There had to be consent and mere knowledge is not sufficient.

Option (1) is incorrect: A private action lies in public nuisance when the damage caused is direct, substantial and consequential.

Option (1) is incorrect: Absolute liability is a standard of legal liability. Option (2) is incorrect: Tortuous liability arises from the breach of a duty primarily fixed by law. Option (3) is correct: The liability of a master for acts of his servant in law of torts is called vicarious liability.

Option (1) is incorrect: Defence of 'volenti non fit injuria' is available if the consent is obtained by compulsion, fraud and under a mistake. Option (2) is incorrect: Defence of 'volenti non fit injuria' is available if the consent is obtained by compulsion, fraud and under a mistake. Option (3) is incorrect: Defence of 'volenti non fit injuria' is available if the consent is obtained by compulsion, fraud and under a mistake. Option (4) is correct: Defence of 'volenti non fit injuria' is available if the consent is obtained by compulsion, fraud and under a mistake.  

Option (1) is correct: Easement is a right in rem. It means right against the whole world.

Option (1) is incorrect: Damages awarded for tortuous liabilities are not liquidated. Option (2) is correct: Damages awarded for tortuous liabilities are unliquidated, i.e. not decided before. Option (3) is incorrect: Damages awarded for tortuous liabilities are not penal.

Option (1) is incorrect: Damage caused to the plaintiff is an essential element of the tort of malicious prosecution.

Option (1) is correct: Consent of the plaintiff is one of the defence to strict liability and is based on the maxim 'volenti non fit injuria'.

Option (1) is correct: Justice Bhagwati through M. C. Mehta vs. Union of India has propounded the rule of absolute liability.

Option (2) is correct: ‘Qui facit per alium facit perse’ establishes the liability under the law of torts.

Option (1) is incorrect: An indirect intimation about a person or thing, mostly of a disparaging nature, is called innuendo. Option (2) is correct: Defamation by oral utterance rather than by writing, pictures, etc. is called slander. Option (3) is incorrect: Defamation by written or printed words, pictures or in any form other than by spoken words or gestures is called libel.

Option (2) is correct: The act of servant for the benefit of his maser does not constitute in the course of employment.

'Ubi jus ibi remedium' means for every wrong, the law provides a remedy.