0

Sentence Correction Mixed Practice - I

Description: Sentence Correction Mixed Practice - I
Number of Questions: 10
Created by:
Tags: Sentence Correction Mixed Practice - I Adjectives and Adverbs (Word Usage) Preposition and Conjunction Modifier Articles and Determiners
Attempted 0/10 Correct 0 Score 0

The first thing he wanted to do was get the lower part of his body out of the bed, but he had not seen this lower part, and could not imagine what it looked like; it turned out to be too hard to move; it went so slowly; and finally, almost in a frenzy, when he carelessly shoved himself forwards with all the force he could gather, he chose the wrong direction, hit hard against the lower bedpost, and learned from the burning pain he felt that the lower part of his body might well, at present, be the most sensitive.

  1. but he had not seen this lower part, and could not imagine what it looked like; it turned out to be too hard to move; it went so slowly

  2. but he had never seen this lower part, and could not imagine what it looked like; it turned out to be too hard to move; it went so slowly

  3. but he had not seen this lower part, and could not imagine what it looked like; it was turning out to be too hard to move; it went so slowly

  4. but having never seen this lower part, and could not imagine what it looked like; it turned out to be too hard to move; it went so slowly

  5. but he had not seen this lower part, and could not imagine what it looked like; it turned out to be too hard to move; it went so slowly


Correct Option: B
Explanation:

The sentence is referring to a person trying to move the lower part of his own body and it is trying to emphasise the fact that he has not seen it so never needs to be used in preference to not. The initial construct being in simple past would require continuation of the same so looked like is to be preferred. Hence (2).

The war with Germany, incident on that country's seizure of the Samoan Islands, had left no visible scars upon the republic, and the temporary occupation of Norfolk by the invading army was forgotten in the joy over repeated naval victories, and the subsequent ridiculous plight of General Von Gartenlaube's forces in the State of New Jersey.

  1. and the temporary occupation of Norfolk by the invading army was forgotten in the joy over repeated naval victories

  2. and the temporary occupation of Norfolk by the invading army were forgotten in the joy over repeated naval victories

  3. and the temporary occupation of Norfolk by the invading army had been forgotten in the joy over repeated naval victories

  4. and the temporary occupation of Norfolk by the invading army, forgotten in the joy over repeated naval victories

  5. and the temporary occupation of Norfolk by the invading army in the process of being forgotten in the joy over repeated naval victories


Correct Option: C
Explanation:

The sentence refers to a past incident - (the war with Germany) - and also goes on to assert that the occupation was already forgotten so the best construct to use would be the past perfect passive. Hence (3).

In many cases, Chinese banks work with so-called trust firms to attract savings through high-yielding investment products while lend the money to high-risk sectors, including property developers and cash-strapped local governments, without having to book the loans on their balance sheets.

  1. with so-called trust firms to attract savings through high-yielding investment products while lend the money to high-risk sectors

  2. with so-called trust firms to attract savings through high-yield investment products to lend the money to high-risk sectors

  3. with so-called trust firms to attract savers through high-yield investment products to lend the money to high-risk sectors

  4. with so-called trust firms to attract savers through high-yielding investment products and lend the money to high-risk sectors

  5. with so-called trust firms to attract savings through high-yielding investment products and lend the money to high-risk sectors


Correct Option: D
Explanation:

The points of contention in the sentence are – savers/savings, high-yielding/high-yield and while/to/and. Banks would work to attract savers obviously as savings per se cannot be attracted. The adjective form of high-yield that is apt for the sentence is high yielding. And the best conjunction for the sentence would be ‘and’ as ‘while’ and ‘to’ are out of context. Hence (4).

Here, in this room, more than four hundred years ago had assembled from various parts of the Christian world, not less than thirty cardinals, four patriarchs, twenty archbishops, one hundred and fifty bishops, two hundred professors of theology, besides princes, ambassadors, civil and ecclesiastical, abbots, priors, and inferior churchmen.

  1. Here, in this room, more than four hundred years ago had assembled from various parts of the Christian world, not less than thirty cardinals

  2. Here, in this room, more than four hundred years ago, assembled from all parts of the Christian world, no less than thirty cardinals

  3. Here, in this room, more than four hundred years ago were assembled from various parts of the Christian world, not one less than thirty cardinals

  4. Here, in this room, more than four hundred years ago had assembled from all parts of the Christian world, no less than thirty cardinals

  5. Here, in this room, more than four hundred years ago were assembled from all parts of the Christian world, no less than thirty cardinals


Correct Option: E
Explanation:

The three points of contention in the sentence are – assembled, parts of world and less than thirty. The sentence is illustrative and tells us about a room in which the writer is at the moment present, so ‘were’ is to be preferred over ‘had’. In referring to the Christian world the author is trying to focus on the huge number of the gatherers so all is a better qualifier than various. For thirty cardinals since we are talking in terms of numbers, no is preferable to not. Hence (5).

He who can peruse it without a tearful eye, a heaving breast, an afflicted spirit, without being filled with an unutterable abhorrence of slavery and all its abettors, and animated with a determination to seek the immediate overthrow of that execrable system, without trembling for the fate of this country in the hands of a righteous God, who is ever on the side of the oppressed, and whose arm is not shortened that it cannot save, must have a flinty heart, and be qualified to act the part of a trafficker “in slaves and the souls of men.”

  1. can peruse it without a tearful eye, a heaving breast, an afflicted spirit, without being filled with an unutterable abhorrence of slavery and all its abettors, and animated with a determination to seek the immediate overthrow of that execrable system

  2. could peruse it without a tearful eye, a heaving breast, an afflicted spirit, without being filled with an unutterable abhorrence of slavery and all its abettors, and animated with a determination to seek the immediate overthrow of this execrable system

  3. can peruse it without a tearful eye, a heaving breast, an afflicted spirit, without being filled with an unutterable abhorrence of slavery and all its abettors, and getting animated with a determination to seek the immediate overthrow of that execrable system

  4. can peruse it without a tearful eye, a heaving breast, an afflicted spirit, without being filled with an unutterable abhorrence of slavery and all its abettors, and animated with a determination to seek the immediate overthrow of such an execrable system


Correct Option: A
Explanation:

When talking about a person's ability to accomplish something in a given situation 'can' is preferred to 'could'. The 'without being' before filled is acting as a qualifier for both 'filled' as well as 'animated' so any other qualifier before 'animated' is redundant. The 'execrable system' is not defined hence 'that' is a better fit over 'this'. 'Such as' is used to illustrate something which is not the case here. Hence (1).

He capered before them down the forty-foot hole, fluttering his wing-like hands, leaping nimbly, Mercury's hat quivering in the fresh wind that bore back to them his brief bird-sweet cries.

  1. capered before them down the forty-foot hole, fluttering his wing-like hands, leaping nimbly, Mercury's hat quivering in the fresh wind that bore back

  2. is capering before them down the forty-foot hole, fluttering his wing-like hands, leaping nimbly, Mercury's hat quivering in the fresh wind bearing

  3. capers before them down towards the forty-foot hole, fluttering his wing-like hands, leaping nimbly, Mercury's hat quivering in the fresh wind that bears

  4. capered before them down towards the forty-foot hole, fluttering his wing-like hands, leaping nimbly, Mercury's hat quivering in the fresh wind that bore back

  5. capered before them down towards the forty-foot hole, fluttered his wing-like hands, leaped nimbly and Mercury's hat quivered in the fresh wind that bore back


Correct Option: D
Explanation:

Caper implies jumping or skipping playfully so capering or capers can be used only if the activity is performed live – a very unlikely situation. Capered down towards the forty-foot hole is better than capering down the forty foot hole because in the latter case it would not be a caper as much a leaping to death. The fresh wind can bear the bird-sweet cries but ‘bear to them’ requires a ‘back’. Hence (4).

Starting from the principles of Symbolism and the relations which are necessary between words and things in any language, it applies the result of this inquiry to various departments of traditional philosophy, showing in every case how traditional philosophy and traditional solutions arise out of ignorance of the principles of Symbolism and out of misuse of language.

  1. it applies the result of this inquiry to various departments of traditional philosophy, showing in every case how traditional philosophy and traditional solutions arise out of ignorance of the principles of Symbolism and out of misuse of language.

  2. it applies the result of this inquiry to various departments of traditional philosophy, showing in each case how traditional philosophy and traditional solutions arise out of ignorance of the principles of Symbolism and out of misuse of language.

  3. it seeks to apply the result of this inquiry to various departments of traditional philosophy, showing in such cases how traditional philosophy and traditional solutions arise out of ignorance of the principles of Symbolism and out of misuse of language.

  4. it seeks to apply the results of this inquiry to various departments of traditional philosophy, showing in every case how traditional philosophy and traditional solutions arise out of ignorance of the principles of Symbolism and out of misuse of language.

  5. it applies the results of this inquiry to various departments of traditional philosophy, showing in every case how traditional philosophy and traditional solutions arise out of ignorance of the principles of Symbolism and out of misuse of language.


Correct Option: B
Explanation:

'Applies' is preferable to 'seeks to apply' as the result is getting applied than merely being attempted to be applied. The sentence talks of a single inquiry, hence 'result' is a better construct over 'results'. The difference between 'each' and 'every' is very subtle - with 'each' expressing the idea of 'one by one' & emphasizing individuality which is the requirement of the sentence here.  'Such cases' being an illustrative qualifier does not gel with the tone of the sentence. Hence (2).

It was as if the plague had broken out in the country and news had been spreading around that in one or another place there was a man, a wise man, a knowledgeable one, whose words and breath was enough to heal everyone who had been infected with the pestilence, and as such news would go through the land and everyone would talk about it, many would believe, many would doubt, but many would get on their way as soon as possible, to seek the wise man, the helper, just like this the myth ran through the land, that fragrant myth of Gotama, the Buddha, the wise man of the family of Sakya.

  1. It was as if the plague had broken out in the country and news had been spreading around that in one or another place there was a man, a wise man, a knowledgeable one, whose words and breath was enough to heal everyone who had been infected with the pestilence

  2. It was as if the plague had broken out in a country and the news had been spreading around that in one or another place there was a man, the wise man, the knowledgeable one, whose word and breath was enough to heal everyone who had been infected with the pestilence

  3. It was as if the plague had broken out in a country and news had been spreading around that in one or another place there was a man, a wise man, a knowledgeable one, whose word and breath was enough to heal everyone who had been infected with the pestilence

  4. It was as if plague had broken out in the country and the news had been spreading around that in one or another place there was a man, a wise man, a knowledgeable one, whose word and breath was enough to heal anyone who had been infected with the pestilence

  5. It was as if plague had broken out in a country and news had been spreading around that in one or another place there was a man, a wise man, a knowledgeable one, whose words and breath was enough to heal everyone who had been infected with a pestilence


Correct Option: C
Explanation:

'Plague' being a specific disease would require 'the' while 'country' being referred to could be any country so 'a' would be the appropriate article for it. 'News' cannot take the till it becomes specific by revealing its subject which is not the case here. 'Word' and 'Breath' are followed by 'was' so they must both be singular. The 'healing' is not for any specific individual but everyone so 'everyone' is the preferable construct. The 'pestilence' refers to the plague mentioned earlier so it should take 'the'. Hence (3).

Language disguises the thought; so that from the external form of the clothing one cannot infer the form of the thought clothed, because the external form of the clothes is constructed with quite another object than to let the form of the body be recognized.

  1. so that from the external form of the clothing one cannot infer the form of the thought clothed, because the external form of the clothes is constructed with quite another object than to let the form of the body be recognized

  2. so that by the external form of the clothes one cannot infer the form of the thought clothed, because the external form of the clothes is constructed with quite another object than to let the form of the body be recognized

  3. so that from the external form of the clothes one cannot infer the form of the thought they clothe, because the external form of the clothes is constructed with an altogether different object than to let the form of the body be recognized

  4. so that by the external form of the clothing one cannot infer the form of the thought clothed, because the external form of the clothes is constructed with quite another object than to let the form of the body be recognized

  5. so that from the external form of the clothes one cannot infer the form of the thought they clothe, because the external form of the clothes is constructed with quite another object than to let the form of the body be recognized


Correct Option: E
Explanation:

The ‘clothes’ after ‘because’ gives a good indication that the correct form to begin should also be ‘clothes’ than ‘clothing’ and so ‘they clothe’ is to be preferred to ‘clothed’. ‘quite another object’ is again preferable to ‘an altogether different object’ because of the latter construct’s extremism. Hence (5).

I say at once there are few difficulties in holding hereditary states, and those that are long accustomed to the family of their prince, than new ones; for it is sufficient only not to transgress the customs of his ancestors, and to deal prudently with circumstances as they arise, for a prince of average powers to maintain himself in his state, unless he be deprived of it by some extraordinary and excessive force; and if he should be so deprived of it, whenever anything sinister happens to the usurper, he will regain it.

  1. there are few difficulties in holding hereditary states, and those that are long accustomed to the family of their prince, than new ones; for it is sufficient only not to transgress the customs of his ancestors, and to deal prudently with circumstances as they arise, for a prince of average powers to maintain himself in his state

  2. there are fewer difficulties in holding hereditary states, and those that are long accustomed to the family of their prince, than newer ones; for it is sufficient only not to transgress the customs of his ancestors, and to deal prudently with circumstances as they arise, for a prince of average powers to maintain himself in his state

  3. there are few difficulties in holding hereditary states, and those long accustomed to the family of their prince, than new ones; for it is sufficient not only to transgress the customs of his ancestors, and to deal prudently with circumstances as they arise, for a prince of average powers to maintain himself in his state

  4. there are fewer difficulties in holding hereditary states, and those long accustomed to the family of their prince, than new ones; for it is sufficient only not to transgress the customs of his ancestors, and to deal prudently with circumstances as they arise, for a prince of average powers to maintain himself in his state

  5. there are fewer difficulties in holding hereditary states, and those long accustomed to the family of their prince, than the newer ones; for it is sufficient not only to transgress the customs of his ancestors, but also to deal prudently with circumstances as they arise, for a prince of average powers to maintain himself in his state


Correct Option: D
Explanation:

‘Fewer’ is the right construct as there is a comparison between the two types of states. ‘that are’ before long is redundant and hence not needed. ‘new’ before ‘ones’ does not need a comparative form as there is no comparison hence ‘newer’ is not needed. ‘only not’ is the right construct as it qualifies ‘to transgress’ where not only would take the meaning in an absolutely unrelated direction. Hence (4).

- Hide questions