The nature of offence may matter, but not the nature of offender. The amount of damage, character of offender and circumstances of case are the basics for release order.

The appeal can be made to Session court. Thus option (1) is correct. The appeal can’t be made directly to High or Supreme court. The Home minister is not authorised to entertain the appeal directly.

For the purpose of providing for speedy trial, the State Government shall, with the concurrence of the Chief Justice of the High Court, by notification in the Official Gazette, specify for each district a Court of Session to be a Special Court to try the offences under this Act. 

These are mandatory provisions under Section 3. 

According to Section 41 of the Act, the State Government has the power to make rule to regulate such traffic. The Centre Government has the powers to make rules across the custom frontiers. The forest settlement officer has to implement and administrate such rules. The collector is responsible for collection of revenue.

Generally these offences are cognisable as well as non-bailable. The bail can be granted only if the public prosecutor has been given the opportunity to oppose such bail and the court is satisfied that the person is not likely to commit any offence while on bail. The offences are non-compoundable and bailable otherwise.

The Limitation Act was passed in 1963. Thus (B) is the correct option. The Food Corporation Act was passed in 1964. The Payment of Bonus Act was passed in 1965. The Passport Act was passed in 1967.

The person may be sentenced imprisonment, which may extend to one month of a fine of Rs. 500 or both. The imprisonment can’t be extended to three months, six months or two years. Thus other options are incorrect.

Option (4) is correct as Bar of Limitations Act applies to appeal, suit and applications.

Option (3) is correct as the computation is made from the day on which judgment was pronounced and the time requisite for obtaining copy of the decree shall be excluded. The day of judgment will not be included.

As per Section 5, the delay can be condoned if there is sufficient reason such as illness, hospitalisation, etc. for delay in appeal. However, this section is applicable for appeals only. Thus (4) is incorrect. It is also incorrect under Section 3. Only (3) is the correct answer.

The period applicable for the government is 30 years. Thus (3) is the correct option. This period is 20 years if such property does not belong to government.

Option (2) is correct as Section 17 is concerned with fraud of the defendant. It is not concerned with plaintiff or third party. It can’t be applicable to both plaintiff and defendant.

Section 15(1) states that in computing the period of limitation, the time of continuance of the injunction or order, the day on which the injunction was issued and the day on which it was withdrawn, shall be excluded.

A fresh period of limitation shall be computed from the time when payment was made.