The ‘removal of difficulties’ clause is nicknamed as the Henry VIII clause to indicate the autocracy of executive.

Speaking order is also known as reasoned decision.

'Audi alteram partem' is a Latin phrase meaning "listen to the other side" or "let the other side be heard as well".

Doctrine of standing or standing to sue is a court-created doctrine which determines whether or not the court will hear a particular federal lawsuit.

The doctrines of “mootness” and “ripeness” both deal with when it is appropriate for a court to hear a particular case. They are related to the case or controversy requirement in the US Constitution, which limits courts to hearing only those cases in which actual people or companies have an actual stake in the matter.

Post-decisional hearing takes place where it may not be feasible to hold pre-decisional hearing. This principle was laid down in Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India. This post-decisional hearing cannot be treated as a substitute of pre-decisional hearing, the reason being that for the aggrieved person, pre-decisional hearing affords such better safeguards.

Post-decisional hearing takes place where it may not be feasible to hold pre-decisional hearing. This principle was laid down in Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India. This post decisional hearing cannot be treated as a substitute of pre-decisional hearing, the reason being that for the aggrieved person, pre-decisional hearing affords such better safeguards.

A mandatory procedural requirement for an administrative tribunal must be reasoned decision. It makes the process of stating the reason mandatory. 

The doctrine of proportionality is emerging as another new ground of judicial review of administrative action. With the rapid growth of administrative law and the need and necessity to control possible abuse of discretionary powers by various administrative authorities, certain principles have been evolved by the courts. If an action taken by any authority is contrary to law, improper, unreasonable or irrational, a court of law can interfere with such action by exercising power of judicial review. One of such modes of exercising power is the doctrine of proportionality.

Administrative Tribunal exercises quasi judicial functions. A quasi-judicial body is an entity such as an arbitrator or tribunal board, generally of a public administrative agency, which has powers and procedures resembling those of a court of law or judge.

Judicial review is the doctrine under which legislative and executive actions are subject to review by the judiciary.

The French body of administrative law is called "droit administratif".

Section 2 of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 specifically provides that the provisions of Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 shall not apply to

1. any member of the naval, military or air force or of any other armed forces of the Union
2. any officer or servant of the Supreme Court or any High Court
3. any person appointed to the secretarial staff of either House of Parliament or to the secretarial staff of any State Legislature of a House thereof or in the case of a Union territory having a Legislature, of that Legislature

On the abuse of discretion of court, mala fide intention, irrelevant consideration and unreasonableness are the grounds on which the judicial review of an administrative action be made.

In the exercise of sovereign powers by the servants, the liability of State exists in England only.