The Fundamental Right to move the Supreme Court has been described as the cornerstone of the democratic edifice raised by the Constitution and as such the Supreme Court must always regard it as its solemn duty to protect the said Fundamental rights zealously and vigilantly. This has been stated by the Supreme Court in:

Which one of the following is the correct statement? 'Full Faith and Credit' clause of the constitution does not apply to:

In which of the following statement “undue influence” does nut exist

Which of the following is related to “settlement”?

When the parties to the contract agree to substitute the existing contract with new contract, it is called

United Nations Organisation was established in:

In which of the following cases Supreme Court held 'Talakul Biddat' is not a valid divorce?

In which case has the Supreme Court of India held that there is no reason to compel non-smokers to be helpless victims of air pollution?

For an action of nuisance defendant can put up the following defence. (i) The place is suitable for the purpose. (ii) It is for the benefit of the residents of the locality. (iii) It is done under statutory authority. (iv) Plaintiff has consented to the act. Of the above statement:

The rule of Absolute Liability was first laid down by: -

In Denough Vs. Stevenson, the duty of a manufacturer was fixed towards:

In which of the case the Question of Constitutional validity of section 9 of the Hindu Marriage Act. 1955 came for consideration for the first time?

The term MALFEASANCE applies to:

Lay-off means:

Principal modes of peaceful settlement of disputes are:

Res Ipsa loquitur means:

Marriage between a Muslim male and a Christian female under Muslim Law is:

Which one of the following is not a source of law?

Which set of the following is the concepts of law?

'Y' picks 'X's pocket. Next day. 'X' while buying paan near his office finds. 'Y' paying money from his (X's) purse. 'X' catches hold of 'Y' and tries to take back his purse. 'Y' resists. 'X' twists 'Y's' arm with such force that it is broken. 'X' is charged with causing hurt to 'Y'. In his defence 'X' can:

In the Nash Vs. Inman case, the issue was:

'A' instigates 'B' to instigate 'C' to kill 'D'. In pursuance of that instigation B writes a letter to C to kill D. C does not read the letter. Therefore:

X abets Y to beat Z. While Y was beating Z at the residence of Z, X reaches there with three of his friends. Y still continues to beat him. Point out the correct answer.

International disputes are settled by:

Directions: The following items consist of two statements, one labelled OS Assertion (A) and the other as Reason (R). You are to examine these statements and decide if the Assertion (A) and the Reason (R) are individually true and if so, whether tile Reason is a correct explanation of the Assertion. Select Your answer in these items using the codes given below. Assertion (A): Immunity under statutory authority is not only for the harm which is obvious but also for that harm which is incidental Reason (R): When an act is done under the authority of an Act, it is a complete defence