Empiricists believe that moral knowledge is derived from our experiences and observations of the world around us.

John Locke is widely regarded as the father of Empiricism, having developed the theory in his work, 'An Essay Concerning Human Understanding'.

Empiricists argue that moral values are subjective and relative, meaning they are based on individual experiences and perspectives.

Empiricists believe that moral knowledge is acquired through our experiences and observations of the consequences of our actions.

Empiricists argue that reason can be used to justify and explain moral beliefs, but it is not the primary source of moral knowledge.

Empiricists argue that innate moral intuitions are unreliable, culturally determined, and subjective, and therefore cannot be a reliable source of moral knowledge.

Empiricists argue that moral values and emotions are closely related, with emotions playing a significant role in shaping our moral judgments.

Empiricists argue that moral values are subjective and relative, meaning they are based on individual experiences and perspectives, and there is no objective standard of morality.

David Hume argued that moral judgments are based on feelings of pleasure and pain, and that these feelings are the foundation of our moral beliefs.

Empiricists argue that moral disagreement is evidence of the subjectivity of moral values, as it shows that there is no universal agreement on what is right and wrong.

Empiricists argue that experience is one of several factors that influence moral decision-making, along with reason, emotions, and cultural norms.

Adam Smith argued that moral judgments are based on sympathy and fellow-feeling, and that our moral sentiments are rooted in our ability to empathize with others.

Empiricists argue that morality is independent of religion, and that moral values can be justified without reference to religious beliefs.

Jeremy Bentham argued that the greatest happiness of the greatest number should be the guiding principle of morality, and that actions should be judged based on their consequences.