Testimony

Authority

Tradition

Experience

By relying on the expertise of the testifier.

By considering the testifier's motives and biases.

By examining the evidence that supports the testimony.

All of the above.

Authority is based on the power of an individual or institution, while tradition is based on the accumulated wisdom of a group.

Authority is based on the knowledge of an individual or institution, while tradition is based on the beliefs of a group.

Authority is based on the experience of an individual or institution, while tradition is based on the history of a group.

None of the above.

By relying on the wisdom of the past.

By considering the cultural context of the tradition.

By examining the evidence that supports the tradition.

All of the above.

Strengths: External factors can provide a reliable source of information. Weaknesses: External factors can be biased or unreliable.

Strengths: External factors can help us to avoid bias. Weaknesses: External factors can be difficult to evaluate.

Strengths: External factors can help us to learn new things. Weaknesses: External factors can be overwhelming.

All of the above.

By providing evidence that contradicts the knowledge claim.

By showing that the knowledge claim is based on faulty reasoning.

By demonstrating that the knowledge claim is biased or unreliable.

All of the above.

By considering the source's expertise and reputation.

By examining the evidence that supports the source's claims.

By considering the source's motives and biases.

All of the above.

External factors can be biased or unreliable.

External factors can be difficult to evaluate.

External factors can be overwhelming.

All of the above.

By being critical of external sources of information.

By seeking out multiple sources of information.

By considering the context of the information.

All of the above.

External factors can provide us with new information.

External factors can help us to challenge our existing beliefs.

External factors can help us to develop new ways of thinking.

All of the above.

By exposing us to different perspectives.

By challenging our assumptions.

By helping us to identify our own biases.

All of the above.

We should not rely on external factors that are biased or unreliable.

We should not use external factors to justify knowledge claims that are harmful to others.

We should not use external factors to justify knowledge claims that are not in the public interest.

All of the above.

By using external factors to challenge unjust social structures.

By using external factors to raise awareness of social injustices.

By using external factors to develop new strategies for social change.

All of the above.

External factors will become increasingly important in the justification of knowledge.

External factors will become less important in the justification of knowledge.

The role of external factors in the justification of knowledge will remain the same.

It is impossible to predict the future of the use of external factors to justify knowledge.