The Rome Statute's primary objective is to establish a permanent international criminal court that can investigate and prosecute individuals accused of committing serious international crimes.

The International Criminal Court has jurisdiction over four core crimes: genocide, crimes against humanity, war crimes, and the crime of aggression. These crimes are defined in the Rome Statute and are considered to be the most serious international crimes.

The International Criminal Court has jurisdiction over individuals, regardless of their nationality or official position. This means that anyone, including heads of state, government officials, and military commanders, can be prosecuted by the Court if they are accused of committing serious international crimes.

The principle of complementarity is a fundamental principle of the Rome Statute. It states that the International Criminal Court can only prosecute cases if national courts are unable or unwilling to do so. This means that the Court will only intervene in cases where national courts are either unable or unwilling to investigate and prosecute serious international crimes.

The Security Council has the power to refer cases to the International Criminal Court. This means that the Security Council can decide that a particular situation or case should be investigated and prosecuted by the Court. The Security Council can also request the Court to take specific actions, such as issuing arrest warrants or freezing assets.

The Assembly of States Parties is the governing body of the International Criminal Court. It is composed of representatives from all the countries that have ratified the Rome Statute. The Assembly of States Parties oversees the implementation of the Rome Statute, elects the judges of the Court, adopts the budget of the Court, and makes decisions on other important matters related to the Court's functioning.

The Prosecutor is the chief prosecutor of the International Criminal Court. The Prosecutor is responsible for investigating and prosecuting cases before the Court. The Prosecutor also represents the victims of international crimes and provides legal assistance to national courts.

The judges of the International Criminal Court are responsible for deciding on the guilt or innocence of the accused. They also interpret the Rome Statute and the Court's rules of procedure. The judges issue arrest warrants and freezing orders, and they can also order reparations for victims of international crimes.

The Registry of the International Criminal Court provides administrative and logistical support to the Court. The Registry manages the Court's budget, provides legal assistance to victims of international crimes, and carries out other important tasks related to the Court's functioning.

The Trust Fund for Victims of the International Criminal Court provides financial assistance to victims of international crimes. The Trust Fund also supports the work of the Court's Victims and Witnesses Unit, which provides support and assistance to victims and witnesses throughout the Court's proceedings. The Trust Fund also provides legal assistance to national courts.

The Rome Statute has been ratified by over 120 countries, but it has also been rejected by some countries, including the United States and Israel. The Rome Statute has been criticized by some countries for being too one-sided, as it only allows the Court to prosecute individuals from countries that have ratified the Statute.

The International Criminal Court faces a number of challenges, including the fact that it lacks universal jurisdiction, meaning that it can only prosecute individuals from countries that have ratified the Rome Statute. The Court is also underfunded and its proceedings are often slow.

The International Criminal Court has had some successes, including convicting several individuals of serious international crimes. The Court has also helped to raise awareness of international crimes and has contributed to the development of international criminal law.

The future of the International Criminal Court is uncertain. The Court will continue to play an important role in the fight against impunity for serious international crimes, but it will also face increasing challenges in the future. It is possible that the Court may eventually be replaced by a more effective international criminal justice mechanism.