To be honest and forthright in all dealings with clients, courts, and other parties.

To represent the client's interests zealously, even if it means misleading the court.

To avoid any conflict of interest, even if it means withholding information from the client.

To keep all client communications confidential, even if it means withholding information from the court.

Rule 1.1: Competence

Rule 1.2: Scope of Representation

Rule 1.3: Diligence

Rule 1.4: Communication

Candor is a subjective standard, while truthfulness is an objective standard.

Candor is a broader concept that includes both truthfulness and honesty, while truthfulness is a narrower concept that refers only to the accuracy of statements.

Candor is required in all dealings with clients, while truthfulness is only required in dealings with the court.

Candor is a duty owed to the client, while truthfulness is a duty owed to the court.

Lying to a client about the status of their case.

Misleading the court about the facts of a case.

Withholding material information from a client.

All of the above.

Disbarment.

Suspension from practice.

Public censure.

All of the above.

Always be honest and forthright in all dealings with clients, courts, and other parties.

Be aware of the Model Rules of Professional Conduct and comply with them.

Get consent from the client before taking any action that could be considered misleading.

All of the above.

The duty of candor and truthfulness is owed to the client, while the duty of loyalty is owed to the court.

The duty of candor and truthfulness is broader than the duty of loyalty.

The duty of candor and truthfulness is narrower than the duty of loyalty.

There is no difference between the two duties.

Yes, if the client is about to commit a crime.

Yes, if the client is about to harm themselves or others.

Yes, if the client is about to breach a contract.

No, a lawyer is never justified in lying to a client.

Withdraw from the representation.

Report the crime to the authorities.

Both of the above.

None of the above.

The duty of candor and truthfulness requires lawyers to be honest and forthright in all dealings with clients, courts, and other parties, while the duty of confidentiality requires lawyers to keep client communications confidential.

The duty of candor and truthfulness is broader than the duty of confidentiality.

The duty of candor and truthfulness is narrower than the duty of confidentiality.

There is no difference between the two duties.

Yes, if the client is about to commit a crime.

Yes, if the client is about to harm themselves or others.

Yes, if the client is about to breach a contract.

No, a lawyer is never justified in breaching their duty of confidentiality.

Rule 1.1: Competence

Rule 1.2: Scope of Representation

Rule 1.3: Diligence

Rule 1.6: Confidentiality of Information

Disclosing client communications to a third party without the client's consent.

Using client information for the lawyer's own personal benefit.

Revealing client confidences in a court proceeding.

All of the above.

Disbarment.

Suspension from practice.

Public censure.

All of the above.

Always keep client communications confidential.

Get consent from the client before disclosing any client information.

Be aware of the Model Rules of Professional Conduct and comply with them.

All of the above.