0

The Problem of Evil: A Philosophical Examination Through Multiple-Choice Questions

Description: This quiz is designed to assess your understanding of the problem of evil, a philosophical inquiry that explores the existence of evil in the world and its implications for the existence of a benevolent and omnipotent God.
Number of Questions: 14
Created by:
Tags: philosophy of religion the problem of evil theodicy atheism theism
Attempted 0/14 Correct 0 Score 0

What is the problem of evil?

  1. The existence of evil contradicts the existence of a benevolent and omnipotent God.

  2. The existence of evil is evidence of a malevolent and omnipotent God.

  3. The existence of evil is evidence of a benevolent but limited God.

  4. The existence of evil is evidence of a malevolent but limited God.


Correct Option: A
Explanation:

The problem of evil is a philosophical argument that challenges the existence of a benevolent and omnipotent God. It argues that the existence of evil in the world is incompatible with the existence of a God who is both good and all-powerful.

Which philosopher is most closely associated with the problem of evil?

  1. Plato

  2. Aristotle

  3. Epicurus

  4. David Hume


Correct Option: D
Explanation:

David Hume is a Scottish philosopher who is most closely associated with the problem of evil. In his work "Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion", Hume argues that the existence of evil in the world is evidence against the existence of a benevolent and omnipotent God.

What is theodicy?

  1. A defense of the existence of God in the face of the problem of evil.

  2. A denial of the existence of evil.

  3. A theory that explains the origin of evil.

  4. A theory that explains the purpose of evil.


Correct Option: A
Explanation:

Theodicy is a defense of the existence of God in the face of the problem of evil. It attempts to explain how the existence of evil is compatible with the existence of a benevolent and omnipotent God.

What is the free will defense?

  1. The argument that God created humans with free will, which allows them to choose between good and evil.

  2. The argument that God created humans without free will, which prevents them from choosing evil.

  3. The argument that God created humans with limited free will, which allows them to choose between good and evil but also limits their ability to do evil.

  4. The argument that God created humans without limited free will, which prevents them from choosing evil but also limits their ability to do good.


Correct Option: A
Explanation:

The free will defense is a theodicy that argues that God created humans with free will, which allows them to choose between good and evil. This defense claims that the existence of evil is a necessary consequence of human freedom.

What is the soul-making defense?

  1. The argument that God created humans in order to give them the opportunity to develop their souls.

  2. The argument that God created humans in order to give them the opportunity to experience pleasure.

  3. The argument that God created humans in order to give them the opportunity to experience pain.

  4. The argument that God created humans in order to give them the opportunity to experience both pleasure and pain.


Correct Option: A
Explanation:

The soul-making defense is a theodicy that argues that God created humans in order to give them the opportunity to develop their souls. This defense claims that the existence of evil is a necessary part of this process, as it allows humans to learn from their mistakes and grow spiritually.

What is the hiddenness defense?

  1. The argument that God is hidden from humans because he does not want to interfere with their free will.

  2. The argument that God is hidden from humans because he is testing their faith.

  3. The argument that God is hidden from humans because he is punishing them for their sins.

  4. The argument that God is hidden from humans because he does not exist.


Correct Option: A
Explanation:

The hiddenness defense is a theodicy that argues that God is hidden from humans because he does not want to interfere with their free will. This defense claims that if God were to reveal himself to humans, it would undermine their ability to make genuine choices.

What is the atheist response to the problem of evil?

  1. Atheists argue that the existence of evil is evidence against the existence of God.

  2. Atheists argue that the existence of evil is evidence for the existence of a malevolent God.

  3. Atheists argue that the existence of evil is evidence for the existence of a limited God.

  4. Atheists argue that the existence of evil is evidence for the existence of a non-existent God.


Correct Option: A
Explanation:

Atheists argue that the existence of evil is evidence against the existence of God. They claim that the existence of a benevolent and omnipotent God is incompatible with the existence of evil in the world.

What is the evidential argument from evil?

  1. The argument that the existence of evil is evidence against the existence of God.

  2. The argument that the existence of evil is evidence for the existence of a malevolent God.

  3. The argument that the existence of evil is evidence for the existence of a limited God.

  4. The argument that the existence of evil is evidence for the existence of a non-existent God.


Correct Option: A
Explanation:

The evidential argument from evil is an argument that uses the existence of evil as evidence against the existence of God. It claims that the existence of a benevolent and omnipotent God is incompatible with the existence of evil in the world.

What is the logical argument from evil?

  1. The argument that the existence of evil is logically incompatible with the existence of God.

  2. The argument that the existence of evil is logically incompatible with the existence of a malevolent God.

  3. The argument that the existence of evil is logically incompatible with the existence of a limited God.

  4. The argument that the existence of evil is logically incompatible with the existence of a non-existent God.


Correct Option: A
Explanation:

The logical argument from evil is an argument that uses logic to demonstrate that the existence of evil is incompatible with the existence of God. It claims that the existence of a benevolent and omnipotent God is logically contradictory to the existence of evil in the world.

What is the problem of natural evil?

  1. The problem of evil that arises from the existence of natural disasters and other natural phenomena that cause suffering and death.

  2. The problem of evil that arises from the existence of human suffering and death.

  3. The problem of evil that arises from the existence of moral evil.

  4. The problem of evil that arises from the existence of all forms of evil.


Correct Option: A
Explanation:

The problem of natural evil is the problem of evil that arises from the existence of natural disasters and other natural phenomena that cause suffering and death. This problem challenges the existence of a benevolent and omnipotent God, as it is difficult to see how a good and all-powerful God could allow such suffering to occur.

What is the problem of moral evil?

  1. The problem of evil that arises from the existence of natural disasters and other natural phenomena that cause suffering and death.

  2. The problem of evil that arises from the existence of human suffering and death.

  3. The problem of evil that arises from the existence of moral evil.

  4. The problem of evil that arises from the existence of all forms of evil.


Correct Option: C
Explanation:

The problem of moral evil is the problem of evil that arises from the existence of moral evil, such as murder, rape, and theft. This problem challenges the existence of a benevolent and omnipotent God, as it is difficult to see how a good and all-powerful God could allow such evil to occur.

What is the problem of all evil?

  1. The problem of evil that arises from the existence of natural disasters and other natural phenomena that cause suffering and death.

  2. The problem of evil that arises from the existence of human suffering and death.

  3. The problem of evil that arises from the existence of moral evil.

  4. The problem of evil that arises from the existence of all forms of evil.


Correct Option: D
Explanation:

The problem of all evil is the problem of evil that arises from the existence of all forms of evil, including natural evil, moral evil, and all other forms of suffering and pain. This problem challenges the existence of a benevolent and omnipotent God, as it is difficult to see how a good and all-powerful God could allow such evil to exist.

What is theodicy?

  1. A defense of the existence of God in the face of the problem of evil.

  2. A denial of the existence of evil.

  3. A theory that explains the origin of evil.

  4. A theory that explains the purpose of evil.


Correct Option: A
Explanation:

Theodicy is a defense of the existence of God in the face of the problem of evil. It attempts to explain how the existence of evil is compatible with the existence of a benevolent and omnipotent God.

What is the free will defense?

  1. The argument that God created humans with free will, which allows them to choose between good and evil.

  2. The argument that God created humans without free will, which prevents them from choosing evil.

  3. The argument that God created humans with limited free will, which allows them to choose between good and evil but also limits their ability to do evil.

  4. The argument that God created humans without limited free will, which prevents them from choosing evil but also limits their ability to do good.


Correct Option: A
Explanation:

The free will defense is a theodicy that argues that God created humans with free will, which allows them to choose between good and evil. This defense claims that the existence of evil is a necessary consequence of human freedom.

- Hide questions