To ensure that suspects are aware of their rights during custodial interrogation.

To protect law enforcement officers from liability for violating suspects' rights.

To deter suspects from confessing to crimes.

To provide a record of the interrogation for use in court.

As soon as a suspect is taken into custody.

Before any questioning begins.

Only if the suspect asks for an attorney.

Only if the suspect is being interrogated in a police station.

The right to remain silent, the right to an attorney, the right to have an attorney present during questioning, and the right to a speedy trial.

The right to remain silent, the right to an attorney, the right to a jury trial, and the right to confront witnesses.

The right to remain silent, the right to an attorney, the right to a fair trial, and the right to due process of law.

The right to remain silent, the right to an attorney, the right to a speedy and public trial, and the right to a trial by jury.

The police can question the suspect without any restrictions.

The police can question the suspect, but they must stop if the suspect asks for an attorney.

The police cannot question the suspect at all.

The police must provide the suspect with an attorney before questioning them.

The suspect's confession will be inadmissible in court.

The suspect will be released from custody.

The police officer will be subject to disciplinary action.

The suspect will be entitled to a new trial.

Miranda v. Arizona

Escobedo v. Illinois

Gideon v. Wainwright

Mapp v. Ohio

1966

1967

1968

1969

It is a landmark case in criminal procedure.

It has been cited in numerous other Supreme Court cases.

It has been adopted by state courts across the United States.

All of the above.

To protect the suspect's right to remain silent.

To protect the suspect's right to an attorney.

To protect the suspect's right to a fair trial.

All of the above.

A custodial interrogation is when the suspect is in custody, while a non-custodial interrogation is when the suspect is not in custody.

A custodial interrogation is when the suspect is being questioned by the police, while a non-custodial interrogation is when the suspect is being questioned by someone else.

A custodial interrogation is when the suspect is being questioned in a police station, while a non-custodial interrogation is when the suspect is being questioned somewhere else.

A custodial interrogation is when the suspect is being questioned about a crime, while a non-custodial interrogation is when the suspect is being questioned about something else.

The Fifth Amendment protects the suspect's right to remain silent.

The Fifth Amendment protects the suspect's right to an attorney.

The Fifth Amendment protects the suspect's right to a fair trial.

All of the above.

The Sixth Amendment protects the suspect's right to remain silent.

The Sixth Amendment protects the suspect's right to an attorney.

The Sixth Amendment protects the suspect's right to a fair trial.

All of the above.

The Fourteenth Amendment protects the suspect's right to remain silent.

The Fourteenth Amendment protects the suspect's right to an attorney.

The Fourteenth Amendment protects the suspect's right to a fair trial.

All of the above.

It is too protective of criminals.

It makes it more difficult for the police to solve crimes.

It is too complicated and difficult to apply.

All of the above.

Narrowing the definition of custodial interrogation.

Eliminating the requirement that Miranda warnings be given before questioning.

Creating a public safety exception to the Miranda Rule.

All of the above.