Time Travel Ethics and Moral Dilemmas
| Description: Time Travel Ethics and Moral Dilemmas | |
| Number of Questions: 15 | |
| Created by: Aliensbrain Bot | |
| Tags: time travel ethics moral dilemmas |
In the grandfather paradox, if a time traveler goes back in time and kills their own grandfather before they have children, what happens to the time traveler?
-
They cease to exist.
-
They are erased from history.
-
They continue to exist, but in a different timeline.
-
They are transported to a parallel universe.
The grandfather paradox is a logical paradox that arises from the possibility of time travel. It states that if a time traveler goes back in time and kills their own grandfather before they have children, then the time traveler would never have been born. This creates a logical contradiction, as the time traveler cannot exist if their grandfather is dead.
What is the ethical dilemma posed by the trolley problem?
-
Whether to save one person or five people.
-
Whether to sacrifice one person to save many.
-
Whether to kill one person to save many.
-
Whether to let one person die to save many.
The trolley problem is a thought experiment in ethics. It presents a scenario in which a runaway trolley is headed toward five people who are tied to the tracks. You are standing next to a lever that can divert the trolley onto a side track, where it will kill one person instead of five. Would you pull the lever?
What is the ethical dilemma posed by the prisoner's dilemma?
-
Whether to confess or remain silent when accused of a crime.
-
Whether to cooperate or defect in a game theory scenario.
-
Whether to tell the truth or lie to someone.
-
Whether to keep a promise or break it.
The prisoner's dilemma is a game theory scenario in which two prisoners are interrogated separately. Each prisoner has the option to confess or remain silent. If both prisoners confess, they will each receive a sentence of five years. If one prisoner confesses and the other remains silent, the confessor will receive a sentence of one year and the silent prisoner will receive a sentence of ten years. If both prisoners remain silent, they will each receive a sentence of three years.
What is the ethical dilemma posed by the violinist problem?
-
Whether to kill one person to save five people.
-
Whether to sacrifice one person to save many.
-
Whether to let one person die to save many.
-
Whether to use one person's organs to save five people.
The violinist problem is a thought experiment in ethics. It presents a scenario in which a famous violinist is kidnapped and hooked up to a machine that is keeping them alive. The machine is connected to five other people, who will all die if the violinist is disconnected. Would it be ethical to disconnect the violinist in order to save the five other people?
What is the ethical dilemma posed by the lifeboat problem?
-
Whether to save one person or five people.
-
Whether to sacrifice one person to save many.
-
Whether to let one person die to save many.
-
Whether to throw someone overboard to save the rest of the people on a lifeboat.
The lifeboat problem is a thought experiment in ethics. It presents a scenario in which a lifeboat is overloaded with people. Some of the people on the lifeboat are arguing that someone should be thrown overboard in order to save the rest of the people. Would it be ethical to do so?
What is the ethical dilemma posed by the Newcomb's paradox?
-
Whether to choose the box with the money or the box with the information.
-
Whether to open the box or leave it closed.
-
Whether to trust the predictor or not.
-
Whether to take the money or leave it.
Newcomb's paradox is a thought experiment in decision theory. It presents a scenario in which a predictor has made two predictions about the future. The predictor has placed a sum of money in one box and a piece of information in another box. The subject is given the choice of taking the box with the money or the box with the information. The paradox arises from the fact that the subject's choice will affect the outcome of the experiment.
What is the ethical dilemma posed by the trolley problem with a fat man?
-
Whether to push the fat man onto the tracks to save five people.
-
Whether to sacrifice the fat man to save five people.
-
Whether to let the fat man die to save five people.
-
Whether to do nothing and let the five people die.
The trolley problem with a fat man is a variation of the trolley problem. In this scenario, the runaway trolley is headed toward five people who are tied to the tracks. You are standing next to a lever that can divert the trolley onto a side track, where it will kill a fat man instead of the five people. Would you pull the lever?
What is the ethical dilemma posed by the trolley problem with a runaway train?
-
Whether to divert the runaway train onto a side track, where it will kill one person.
-
Whether to let the runaway train continue on its current course, where it will kill five people.
-
Whether to do nothing and let the runaway train kill both the one person and the five people.
-
Whether to try to stop the runaway train, even if it means risking your own life.
The trolley problem with a runaway train is a variation of the trolley problem. In this scenario, a runaway train is headed toward five people who are tied to the tracks. You are standing next to a lever that can divert the train onto a side track, where it will kill one person instead of the five people. Would you pull the lever?
What is the ethical dilemma posed by the trolley problem with a footbridge?
-
Whether to push a fat man off a footbridge to save five people.
-
Whether to sacrifice the fat man to save five people.
-
Whether to let the fat man die to save five people.
-
Whether to do nothing and let the five people die.
The trolley problem with a footbridge is a variation of the trolley problem. In this scenario, a runaway trolley is headed toward five people who are tied to the tracks. You are standing on a footbridge over the tracks. You could push a fat man off the footbridge onto the tracks, which would stop the trolley and save the five people. Would you do it?
What is the ethical dilemma posed by the trolley problem with a loop?
-
Whether to divert the trolley onto a loop, where it will kill one person.
-
Whether to let the trolley continue on its current course, where it will kill five people.
-
Whether to do nothing and let the trolley kill both the one person and the five people.
-
Whether to try to stop the trolley, even if it means risking your own life.
The trolley problem with a loop is a variation of the trolley problem. In this scenario, a runaway trolley is headed toward five people who are tied to the tracks. You are standing next to a lever that can divert the trolley onto a loop, where it will kill one person instead of the five people. Would you pull the lever?
What is the ethical dilemma posed by the trolley problem with a time machine?
-
Whether to go back in time and prevent the trolley from ever starting.
-
Whether to go back in time and warn the people on the tracks.
-
Whether to go back in time and try to stop the trolley yourself.
-
Whether to do nothing and let the trolley kill the people on the tracks.
The trolley problem with a time machine is a variation of the trolley problem. In this scenario, you have a time machine that you can use to go back in time and prevent the trolley from ever starting. Would you do it?
What is the ethical dilemma posed by the trolley problem with a teleporter?
-
Whether to teleport the trolley to a safe location.
-
Whether to teleport the people on the tracks to a safe location.
-
Whether to do nothing and let the trolley kill the people on the tracks.
-
Whether to try to stop the trolley, even if it means risking your own life.
The trolley problem with a teleporter is a variation of the trolley problem. In this scenario, you have a teleporter that you can use to teleport the trolley to a safe location. Would you do it?
What is the ethical dilemma posed by the trolley problem with a clone?
-
Whether to kill a clone of yourself to save five people.
-
Whether to sacrifice the clone to save five people.
-
Whether to let the clone die to save five people.
-
Whether to do nothing and let the five people die.
The trolley problem with a clone is a variation of the trolley problem. In this scenario, a runaway trolley is headed toward five people who are tied to the tracks. You are standing next to a lever that can divert the trolley onto a side track, where it will kill a clone of yourself instead of the five people. Would you pull the lever?
What is the ethical dilemma posed by the trolley problem with a robot?
-
Whether to kill a robot to save five people.
-
Whether to sacrifice the robot to save five people.
-
Whether to let the robot die to save five people.
-
Whether to do nothing and let the five people die.
The trolley problem with a robot is a variation of the trolley problem. In this scenario, a runaway trolley is headed toward five people who are tied to the tracks. You are standing next to a lever that can divert the trolley onto a side track, where it will kill a robot instead of the five people. Would you pull the lever?
What is the ethical dilemma posed by the trolley problem with an animal?
-
Whether to kill an animal to save five people.
-
Whether to sacrifice the animal to save five people.
-
Whether to let the animal die to save five people.
-
Whether to do nothing and let the five people die.
The trolley problem with an animal is a variation of the trolley problem. In this scenario, a runaway trolley is headed toward five people who are tied to the tracks. You are standing next to a lever that can divert the trolley onto a side track, where it will kill an animal instead of the five people. Would you pull the lever?