Back
0

Defenses in International Criminal Law

Description: This quiz is designed to assess your understanding of the various defenses available in international criminal law. These defenses can be used by individuals accused of committing international crimes to argue that they should not be held criminally responsible for their actions.
Number of Questions: 15
Created by:
Tags: international criminal law defenses criminal responsibility
Start the Quiz
Attempted 0/15 Correct 0 Score 0
‹
›

Which of the following is NOT a defense in international criminal law?

  1. Lack of criminal intent

  2. Self-defense

  3. Necessity

  4. Superior orders

Show answer
Correct Option: D
Explanation:

Superior orders is not a defense in international criminal law. Individuals who commit crimes under the orders of a superior are still held criminally responsible for their actions.

What is the defense of lack of criminal intent?

  1. The defendant did not know that their actions were criminal.

  2. The defendant was acting under duress.

  3. The defendant was acting in self-defense.

  4. The defendant was insane at the time of the crime.

Show answer
Correct Option: A
Explanation:

The defense of lack of criminal intent is available when the defendant did not know that their actions were criminal. This defense is often used in cases where the defendant is from a different country and is not familiar with the local laws.

What is the defense of self-defense?

  1. The defendant was acting to protect themselves or others from imminent harm.

  2. The defendant was acting under duress.

  3. The defendant was acting in the heat of passion.

  4. The defendant was insane at the time of the crime.

Show answer
Correct Option: A
Explanation:

The defense of self-defense is available when the defendant was acting to protect themselves or others from imminent harm. This defense is often used in cases where the defendant was attacked or threatened with violence.

What is the defense of necessity?

  1. The defendant was acting to prevent a greater harm.

  2. The defendant was acting under duress.

  3. The defendant was acting in the heat of passion.

  4. The defendant was insane at the time of the crime.

Show answer
Correct Option: A
Explanation:

The defense of necessity is available when the defendant was acting to prevent a greater harm. This defense is often used in cases where the defendant caused harm to one person in order to save the lives of many others.

What is the defense of duress?

  1. The defendant was acting under the threat of imminent harm.

  2. The defendant was acting to prevent a greater harm.

  3. The defendant was acting in the heat of passion.

  4. The defendant was insane at the time of the crime.

Show answer
Correct Option: A
Explanation:

The defense of duress is available when the defendant was acting under the threat of imminent harm. This defense is often used in cases where the defendant was forced to commit a crime by another person.

What is the defense of insanity?

  1. The defendant was unable to understand the nature and quality of their actions.

  2. The defendant was acting under duress.

  3. The defendant was acting in the heat of passion.

  4. The defendant was acting to prevent a greater harm.

Show answer
Correct Option: A
Explanation:

The defense of insanity is available when the defendant was unable to understand the nature and quality of their actions. This defense is often used in cases where the defendant has a mental illness.

Which of the following is NOT a requirement for the defense of self-defense?

  1. The defendant must have been acting to protect themselves or others from imminent harm.

  2. The defendant must have used reasonable force.

  3. The defendant must have been aware of the imminent harm.

  4. The defendant must have been acting in the heat of passion.

Show answer
Correct Option: D
Explanation:

The defense of self-defense does not require that the defendant was acting in the heat of passion. The defendant may have been acting calmly and rationally.

Which of the following is NOT a requirement for the defense of necessity?

  1. The defendant must have been acting to prevent a greater harm.

  2. The defendant must have used reasonable force.

  3. The defendant must have been aware of the greater harm.

  4. The defendant must have been acting in the heat of passion.

Show answer
Correct Option: D
Explanation:

The defense of necessity does not require that the defendant was acting in the heat of passion. The defendant may have been acting calmly and rationally.

Which of the following is NOT a requirement for the defense of duress?

  1. The defendant must have been acting under the threat of imminent harm.

  2. The defendant must have used reasonable force.

  3. The defendant must have been aware of the imminent harm.

  4. The defendant must have had no other way to avoid the imminent harm.

Show answer
Correct Option: B
Explanation:

The defense of duress does not require that the defendant used reasonable force. The defendant may have used excessive force.

Which of the following is NOT a requirement for the defense of insanity?

  1. The defendant must have been unable to understand the nature and quality of their actions.

  2. The defendant must have been acting under duress.

  3. The defendant must have been acting in the heat of passion.

  4. The defendant must have been unable to control their actions.

Show answer
Correct Option: B
Explanation:

The defense of insanity does not require that the defendant was acting under duress. The defendant may have been acting voluntarily.

In which of the following cases would the defense of self-defense be most likely to succeed?

  1. A person who kills another person in a bar fight.

  2. A person who kills another person in order to protect their property.

  3. A person who kills another person in order to prevent them from committing a crime.

  4. A person who kills another person in order to save their own life.

Show answer
Correct Option: D
Explanation:

The defense of self-defense is most likely to succeed in cases where the defendant was acting to save their own life.

In which of the following cases would the defense of necessity be most likely to succeed?

  1. A person who steals food in order to feed their starving family.

  2. A person who breaks into a house in order to escape a fire.

  3. A person who kills another person in order to prevent them from committing a crime.

  4. A person who destroys property in order to prevent a greater harm.

Show answer
Correct Option: D
Explanation:

The defense of necessity is most likely to succeed in cases where the defendant was acting to prevent a greater harm.

In which of the following cases would the defense of duress be most likely to succeed?

  1. A person who kills another person in order to protect their family.

  2. A person who steals money in order to pay a ransom demand.

  3. A person who breaks into a house in order to escape a fire.

  4. A person who kills another person in order to prevent them from committing a crime.

Show answer
Correct Option: B
Explanation:

The defense of duress is most likely to succeed in cases where the defendant was acting under the threat of imminent harm.

In which of the following cases would the defense of insanity be most likely to succeed?

  1. A person who kills another person in a bar fight.

  2. A person who kills another person in order to protect their property.

  3. A person who kills another person in order to prevent them from committing a crime.

  4. A person who kills another person because they believe that they are a demon.

Show answer
Correct Option: D
Explanation:

The defense of insanity is most likely to succeed in cases where the defendant was unable to understand the nature and quality of their actions.

Which of the following is the most important factor in determining whether a defense is successful?

  1. The facts of the case.

  2. The law.

  3. The judge.

  4. The jury.

Show answer
Correct Option: A
Explanation:

The facts of the case are the most important factor in determining whether a defense is successful. The law and the judge are also important factors, but they are less important than the facts of the case.

- Hide questions
ADVERTISEMENT

Find more quizzes from top tags

general knowledge
3615 Quizzes
119858 Questions
 technology
307 Quizzes
36705 Questions
 sports
963 Quizzes
19148 Questions
 history
1187 Quizzes
13475 Questions
 physics
598 Quizzes
13441 Questions
 biology
1160 Quizzes
12174 Questions
 science & technology
551 Quizzes
11015 Questions
 chemistry
490 Quizzes
9892 Questions
 maths
518 Quizzes
9324 Questions
 softskills
0 Quizzes
7131 Questions