Acting on principles that are personally beneficial.

Acting on principles that are universally applicable and morally justifiable.

Acting on principles that are culturally accepted.

Acting on principles that are convenient and easy to follow.

Whether it benefits the individual.

Whether it is consistent with personal beliefs.

Whether it can be universally applied without contradiction.

Whether it is approved by society.

It ensures that moral principles are subjective and relative to individuals.

It allows for moral principles to be flexible and adaptable to different situations.

It provides a foundation for objective and impartial moral judgments.

It promotes moral relativism and the idea that there are no universal moral truths.

Plato

Aristotle

Immanuel Kant

John Stuart Mill

A moral principle that requires actions to be universally applicable.

A moral principle that emphasizes the importance of consequences.

A moral principle that focuses on the intrinsic value of human beings.

A moral principle that promotes the greatest happiness for the greatest number.

By comparing actions to personal preferences and values.

By considering the consequences of actions for specific individuals.

By examining whether actions can be universally applied without contradiction.

By relying on cultural norms and societal expectations.

Good will is the ultimate end of moral actions.

Good will is the same as universalizability.

Good will is the opposite of universalizability.

Good will is irrelevant to moral actions.

It provides a definitive solution to all moral disagreements.

It eliminates the possibility of moral disagreement.

It offers a framework for resolving moral disagreements through rational discussion.

It exacerbates moral disagreement by imposing a single moral standard.

A moral principle that emphasizes the importance of human dignity.

A moral principle that requires actions to be universally applicable.

A moral principle that focuses on the intrinsic value of human life.

A moral principle that promotes the greatest happiness for the greatest number.

It is unrelated to the concept of respect for persons.

It is the same as the concept of respect for persons.

It is a necessary condition for respect for persons.

It is a sufficient condition for respect for persons.

It is outdated and no longer relevant to modern moral issues.

It is a widely accepted and influential moral principle.

It is only relevant to certain cultures and societies.

It is a controversial and divisive moral principle.

Always tell the truth, even if it hurts someone's feelings.

Never steal, even if you are in desperate need.

Always obey the law, even if it is unjust.

Always put your own interests first.

It is too vague and abstract to be useful in practical moral decision-making.

It is too rigid and inflexible, leading to overly simplistic moral judgments.

It ignores the importance of cultural and contextual factors in moral decision-making.

It is based on a false assumption that human beings are rational and impartial moral agents.

It cannot be applied to global moral issues because it is too narrow and limited.

It can be applied to global moral issues by considering the interests of all affected parties.

It can be applied to global moral issues by imposing a single moral standard on all cultures.

It can be applied to global moral issues by ignoring cultural differences and focusing on universal human values.

The Principle of Universalizability undermines moral autonomy by imposing external moral standards.

The Principle of Universalizability is unrelated to the concept of moral autonomy.

The Principle of Universalizability promotes moral autonomy by encouraging individuals to think critically about moral principles.

The Principle of Universalizability is incompatible with the concept of moral autonomy.