Objectification is a key concept in feminist philosophy, but it is not a central concept in feminist legal theory.

Cultural feminism is not a school of thought within feminist jurisprudence. It is a broader movement that emphasizes the importance of women's culture and experience.

One of the key arguments in feminist legal scholarship is that the law is inherently patriarchal. This means that it is based on and perpetuates the values and norms of patriarchy, a system of social organization in which men hold primary power.

Catharine MacKinnon, Andrea Dworkin, and Robin West are all prominent feminist legal scholars.

Roe v. Wade, Griswold v. Connecticut, and Reed v. Reed are all landmark cases in feminist legal history. Roe v. Wade established the right to abortion, Griswold v. Connecticut established the right to contraception, and Reed v. Reed established the principle of gender equality in the law.

Deconstruction, difference, and multiplicity are all key concepts in postmodern feminist legal theory.

Feminist legal theory has a number of goals, including promoting gender equality, challenging the patriarchal bias of the law, and developing new legal theories and concepts that are more inclusive of women's experiences.

Feminist legal theory has been criticized for being too focused on women's rights and neglecting the rights of other marginalized groups, for being too essentialist and not accounting for the diversity of women's experiences, and for being too utopian and not providing a realistic roadmap for social change.

The rise of intersectionality, the development of new theories of sexual harassment, and the increasing focus on global feminism are all recent developments in feminist legal theory.

The backlash against feminism, the rise of neoliberalism, and the increasing diversity of women's experiences are all challenges facing feminist legal theory today.