Litigation is a process in which a dispute is resolved by a court of law, while ADR is a process in which a dispute is resolved outside of court.

The goal of mediation is to help the parties reach a mutually acceptable agreement, not to determine which party is right or wrong, impose a solution on the parties, or punish the party that is responsible for the conflict.

The role of the mediator in a mediation process is to help the parties communicate and negotiate with each other, not to act as a judge, impose a solution on the parties, or punish the party that is responsible for the conflict.

Mediation is a voluntary process, while arbitration is a binding process. Mediation is a confidential process, while arbitration is a public process. Mediation is a less formal process than arbitration.

ADR is often less expensive than litigation, faster than litigation, more confidential than litigation, and more flexible than litigation.

ADR can be difficult to enforce, time-consuming, expensive, and difficult to find qualified mediators or arbitrators.

ADR is most likely to be successful when the parties are willing to cooperate with each other, the issues in dispute are relatively simple, the parties are represented by experienced attorneys, and the mediator or arbitrator is highly skilled.

The most common types of ADR are mediation, arbitration, conciliation, and negotiation.

The role of the arbitrator in an arbitration process is to act as a judge and decide who is right and who is wrong, not to impose a solution on the parties, help the parties communicate and negotiate with each other, or punish the party that is responsible for the conflict.

There is no difference between conciliation and mediation.

The role of the conciliator in a conciliation process is to help the parties communicate and negotiate with each other, not to act as a judge, impose a solution on the parties, or punish the party that is responsible for the conflict.

The most common types of negotiation are distributive negotiation, integrative negotiation, competitive negotiation, and collaborative negotiation.

The goal of distributive negotiation is to divide a fixed pie between the parties, not to create a new pie that is larger than the original pie, build a relationship between the parties, or resolve the conflict in a fair and equitable manner.

The goal of integrative negotiation is to create a new pie that is larger than the original pie, not to divide a fixed pie between the parties, build a relationship between the parties, or resolve the conflict in a fair and equitable manner.

Competitive negotiation is a win-lose process, while collaborative negotiation is a win-win process. Competitive negotiation is a short-term process, while collaborative negotiation is a long-term process. Competitive negotiation is a confrontational process, while collaborative negotiation is a cooperative process.