The Linguistic Community Hypothesis states that the meaning of words is determined by the linguistic community that uses them. This means that the meaning of a word is not something that is fixed and unchanging, but rather something that is constantly being negotiated and renegotiated by the members of the community.

The Linguistic Community Hypothesis was first proposed by Ludwig Wittgenstein in his book Philosophical Investigations.

The Linguistic Community Hypothesis states that language is a social institution that we use to create and maintain social order. It is also a tool that we use to express our thoughts and ideas, and a system of symbols that we use to communicate with each other.

The Linguistic Community Hypothesis has a number of implications, including the following: the meaning of words is not fixed and unchanging; the meaning of words is constantly being negotiated and renegotiated by the members of the community; and the meaning of words is determined by the context in which they are used.

The Linguistic Community Hypothesis has been criticized on a number of grounds, including the following: it is too vague and imprecise; it does not take into account the role of the individual speaker in determining the meaning of words; and it ignores the fact that language is a constantly evolving system.