Difference

Binary Oppositions

Logocentrism

Phenomenology

Language reflects thought.

Language determines thought.

Language and thought are independent.

Language and thought are mutually constitutive.

They represent the fundamental structure of reality.

They are arbitrary and constructed.

They are necessary for understanding the world.

They are a product of logocentrism.

To find their hidden meaning.

To expose their underlying assumptions.

To critique their power structures.

To appreciate their aesthetic qualities.

It posits that truth is absolute and objective.

It argues that truth is relative and subjective.

It denies the existence of truth altogether.

It maintains that truth is a matter of perspective.

Deconstruction is a branch of post-structuralism.

Post-structuralism is a branch of deconstruction.

Deconstruction and post-structuralism are synonymous.

Deconstruction and post-structuralism are unrelated.

Jacques Derrida

Michel Foucault

Judith Butler

Jean-François Lyotard

It refers to the distinction between speech and writing.

It highlights the temporal dimension of language.

It emphasizes the role of context in meaning-making.

It underscores the importance of binary oppositions.

It posits that authors have complete control over their texts.

It argues that texts are autonomous and independent of their authors.

It emphasizes the role of the reader in shaping meaning.

It maintains that texts are transparent representations of reality.

It refers to the physical marks left by writing.

It highlights the absence or erasure of meaning.

It emphasizes the importance of context in interpretation.

It underscores the role of binary oppositions.

It reveals how discourse reinforces existing power structures.

It argues that discourse is neutral and objective.

It emphasizes the role of the author in shaping discourse.

It maintains that discourse is transparent and straightforward.

Deconstruction provides a foundation for ethical decision-making.

Deconstruction is irrelevant to ethical considerations.

Deconstruction undermines the possibility of ethical judgment.

Deconstruction challenges traditional notions of ethics.

It promotes a single, correct interpretation of literary texts.

It emphasizes the author's intention as the primary source of meaning.

It encourages multiple and diverse interpretations of literary texts.

It maintains that literary texts are autonomous and independent of their context.

It has no relevance to contemporary issues and concerns.

It provides a framework for understanding and critiquing various cultural phenomena.

It offers a comprehensive solution to all social and political problems.

It is a purely academic pursuit with no practical applications.