- Epistemic Reliability
- Epistemic Reliability - Quizzes
- Epistemic Reliability: The Problem of Teleology
Epistemic Reliability: The Problem of Teleology
| Description: Epistemic Reliability: The Problem of Teleology | |
| Number of Questions: 15 | |
| Created by: Aliensbrain Bot | |
| Tags: epistemology epistemic reliability teleology |
What is epistemic reliability?
-
The degree to which a belief is justified
-
The degree to which a belief is true
-
The degree to which a belief is useful
-
The degree to which a belief is certain
Epistemic reliability is the degree to which a belief is justified, or the extent to which it is supported by evidence and reason.
What is the problem of teleology?
-
The problem of explaining how the universe came into being
-
The problem of explaining how life arose from non-living matter
-
The problem of explaining why there is something rather than nothing
-
The problem of explaining why the universe is fine-tuned for life
The problem of teleology is the problem of explaining why the universe appears to be fine-tuned for the existence of life, even though there is no apparent reason for this to be the case.
What is the anthropic principle?
-
The principle that the universe must be fine-tuned for life because otherwise we wouldn't be here to observe it
-
The principle that the universe is infinite and therefore there must be an infinite number of life-bearing planets
-
The principle that the universe is constantly expanding and therefore there must be new life-bearing planets forming all the time
-
The principle that the universe is governed by natural laws that make the development of life inevitable
The anthropic principle is the principle that the universe must be fine-tuned for life because otherwise we wouldn't be here to observe it.
What is the multiverse theory?
-
The theory that there are an infinite number of universes, each with its own set of physical laws
-
The theory that there are an infinite number of universes, each with its own set of initial conditions
-
The theory that there are an infinite number of universes, each with its own set of physical laws and initial conditions
-
The theory that there are an infinite number of universes, each with its own set of physical laws, initial conditions, and history
The multiverse theory is the theory that there are an infinite number of universes, each with its own set of physical laws and initial conditions.
What is the fine-tuning argument?
-
The argument that the universe is fine-tuned for life because otherwise we wouldn't be here to observe it
-
The argument that the universe is fine-tuned for life because there is no other way for life to exist
-
The argument that the universe is fine-tuned for life because it is the only way for life to exist
-
The argument that the universe is fine-tuned for life because it is the best way for life to exist
The fine-tuning argument is the argument that the universe is fine-tuned for life because otherwise we wouldn't be here to observe it.
What is the natural selection theory?
-
The theory that life arose from non-living matter through a process of natural selection
-
The theory that life arose from non-living matter through a process of random chance
-
The theory that life arose from non-living matter through a process of intelligent design
-
The theory that life arose from non-living matter through a process of evolution
The natural selection theory is the theory that life arose from non-living matter through a process of natural selection.
What is the intelligent design theory?
-
The theory that life arose from non-living matter through a process of intelligent design
-
The theory that life arose from non-living matter through a process of natural selection
-
The theory that life arose from non-living matter through a process of random chance
-
The theory that life arose from non-living matter through a process of evolution
The intelligent design theory is the theory that life arose from non-living matter through a process of intelligent design.
What is the naturalistic fallacy?
-
The fallacy of deriving an ought from an is
-
The fallacy of deriving an is from an ought
-
The fallacy of deriving a moral conclusion from a non-moral premise
-
The fallacy of deriving a non-moral conclusion from a moral premise
The naturalistic fallacy is the fallacy of deriving an ought from an is.
What is the problem of induction?
-
The problem of justifying the belief that the future will be like the past
-
The problem of justifying the belief that the laws of nature are universal
-
The problem of justifying the belief that our senses are reliable
-
The problem of justifying the belief that our reason is reliable
The problem of induction is the problem of justifying the belief that the future will be like the past.
What is the skeptical argument?
-
The argument that we cannot know anything for certain
-
The argument that we can only know things that are self-evident
-
The argument that we can only know things that are supported by evidence
-
The argument that we can only know things that are supported by reason
The skeptical argument is the argument that we cannot know anything for certain.
What is the Cartesian cogito?
-
The argument that I think, therefore I am
-
The argument that I am, therefore I think
-
The argument that I am, therefore I exist
-
The argument that I exist, therefore I am
The Cartesian cogito is the argument that I think, therefore I am.
What is the problem of other minds?
-
The problem of how we can know that other minds exist
-
The problem of how we can know what other minds are like
-
The problem of how we can communicate with other minds
-
The problem of how we can control other minds
The problem of other minds is the problem of how we can know that other minds exist.
What is the brain-in-a-vat argument?
-
The argument that we might be brains in vats, being fed artificial experiences
-
The argument that we might be brains in vats, being fed real experiences
-
The argument that we might be brains in vats, being fed both artificial and real experiences
-
The argument that we might be brains in vats, being fed no experiences at all
The brain-in-a-vat argument is the argument that we might be brains in vats, being fed artificial experiences.
What is the simulation hypothesis?
-
The hypothesis that we might be living in a computer simulation
-
The hypothesis that we might be living in a real world
-
The hypothesis that we might be living in a both a computer simulation and a real world
-
The hypothesis that we might not be living in a computer simulation or a real world
The simulation hypothesis is the hypothesis that we might be living in a computer simulation.
What is the meaning of life?
-
There is no meaning to life
-
The meaning of life is to be happy
-
The meaning of life is to find your purpose
-
The meaning of life is to make a difference in the world
There is no single, universally agreed-upon answer to the question of the meaning of life.