Second-Order Predicate Logic
| Description: This quiz covers the concepts of Second-Order Predicate Logic, a branch of mathematical logic that extends first-order predicate logic by allowing quantification over predicates. | |
| Number of Questions: 14 | |
| Created by: Aliensbrain Bot | |
| Tags: second-order predicate logic mathematical logic quantification predicates |
In second-order predicate logic, what is the difference between a first-order predicate and a second-order predicate?
-
A first-order predicate is a property of individuals, while a second-order predicate is a property of properties.
-
A first-order predicate is a relation between individuals, while a second-order predicate is a relation between properties.
-
A first-order predicate is a function from individuals to truth values, while a second-order predicate is a function from properties to truth values.
-
A first-order predicate is a set of individuals, while a second-order predicate is a set of properties.
In second-order predicate logic, a first-order predicate is a property that can be applied to individuals, while a second-order predicate is a property that can be applied to properties.
Which of the following is a valid formula in second-order predicate logic?
-
$\exists x \forall y P(x, y)$
-
$\forall x \exists y P(x, y)$
-
$\exists P \forall x P(x)$
-
$\forall P \exists x P(x)$
In second-order predicate logic, it is possible to quantify over predicates. The formula $\exists P \forall x P(x)$ means that there exists a property $P$ such that for all individuals $x$, $P(x)$ is true.
What is the Löwenheim–Skolem theorem?
-
A theorem that states that every first-order theory has a model of every infinite cardinality.
-
A theorem that states that every second-order theory has a model of every infinite cardinality.
-
A theorem that states that every first-order theory has a model of every finite cardinality.
-
A theorem that states that every second-order theory has a model of every finite cardinality.
The Löwenheim–Skolem theorem is a fundamental result in mathematical logic that states that every first-order theory has a model of every infinite cardinality. This means that it is impossible to use first-order logic to prove the existence of a set of a specific infinite cardinality.
What is the Compactness theorem?
-
A theorem that states that every consistent set of first-order sentences has a model.
-
A theorem that states that every consistent set of second-order sentences has a model.
-
A theorem that states that every consistent set of first-order sentences has a finite model.
-
A theorem that states that every consistent set of second-order sentences has a finite model.
The Compactness theorem is a fundamental result in mathematical logic that states that every consistent set of first-order sentences has a model. This means that if a set of first-order sentences does not have a model, then it must be inconsistent.
What is the Completeness theorem?
-
A theorem that states that every valid formula in first-order predicate logic is provable.
-
A theorem that states that every valid formula in second-order predicate logic is provable.
-
A theorem that states that every satisfiable formula in first-order predicate logic is provable.
-
A theorem that states that every satisfiable formula in second-order predicate logic is provable.
The Completeness theorem is a fundamental result in mathematical logic that states that every valid formula in first-order predicate logic is provable. This means that if a formula is true in every model of first-order predicate logic, then it can be proven using the rules of first-order predicate logic.
What is the Gödel's incompleteness theorem?
-
A theorem that states that every consistent first-order theory is either incomplete or unsound.
-
A theorem that states that every consistent second-order theory is either incomplete or unsound.
-
A theorem that states that every consistent first-order theory is either complete or unsound.
-
A theorem that states that every consistent second-order theory is either complete or unsound.
Gödel's incompleteness theorem is a fundamental result in mathematical logic that states that every consistent first-order theory is either incomplete or unsound. This means that there are true statements about the natural numbers that cannot be proven using the rules of first-order logic.
What is the difference between a model and an interpretation in second-order predicate logic?
-
A model is a set of individuals and an interpretation is a function that assigns a truth value to each formula.
-
A model is a set of properties and an interpretation is a function that assigns a truth value to each formula.
-
A model is a set of individuals and an interpretation is a function that assigns a property to each individual.
-
A model is a set of properties and an interpretation is a function that assigns a property to each property.
In second-order predicate logic, a model is a set of individuals and an interpretation is a function that assigns a truth value to each formula. The interpretation is defined by specifying the truth value of each atomic formula and the rules for combining atomic formulas to form more complex formulas.
What is the difference between a theory and a model in second-order predicate logic?
-
A theory is a set of formulas and a model is a set of individuals that satisfies the formulas in the theory.
-
A theory is a set of formulas and a model is a set of properties that satisfies the formulas in the theory.
-
A theory is a set of individuals and a model is a set of formulas that is true for all individuals in the theory.
-
A theory is a set of properties and a model is a set of formulas that is true for all properties in the theory.
In second-order predicate logic, a theory is a set of formulas and a model is a set of individuals that satisfies the formulas in the theory. A model satisfies a formula if the formula is true for all individuals in the model.
What is the difference between a satisfiability and a validity in second-order predicate logic?
-
A formula is satisfiable if there exists a model in which the formula is true, and a formula is valid if it is true in all models.
-
A formula is satisfiable if there exists a model in which the formula is false, and a formula is valid if it is false in all models.
-
A formula is satisfiable if there exists a model in which the formula is true, and a formula is valid if it is false in all models.
-
A formula is satisfiable if there exists a model in which the formula is false, and a formula is valid if it is true in all models.
In second-order predicate logic, a formula is satisfiable if there exists a model in which the formula is true, and a formula is valid if it is true in all models.
What is the difference between a first-order language and a second-order language?
-
A first-order language contains only individual variables, while a second-order language contains both individual variables and predicate variables.
-
A first-order language contains only predicate variables, while a second-order language contains both individual variables and predicate variables.
-
A first-order language contains only individual variables and function symbols, while a second-order language contains both individual variables and predicate variables.
-
A first-order language contains only predicate variables and function symbols, while a second-order language contains both individual variables and predicate variables.
In second-order predicate logic, a first-order language contains only individual variables, while a second-order language contains both individual variables and predicate variables.
What is the difference between a first-order theory and a second-order theory?
-
A first-order theory is a set of formulas in a first-order language, while a second-order theory is a set of formulas in a second-order language.
-
A first-order theory is a set of formulas in a second-order language, while a second-order theory is a set of formulas in a first-order language.
-
A first-order theory is a set of formulas in a first-order language that contains only individual variables, while a second-order theory is a set of formulas in a second-order language that contains both individual variables and predicate variables.
-
A first-order theory is a set of formulas in a second-order language that contains both individual variables and predicate variables, while a second-order theory is a set of formulas in a first-order language that contains only individual variables.
In second-order predicate logic, a first-order theory is a set of formulas in a first-order language, while a second-order theory is a set of formulas in a second-order language.
What is the difference between a first-order model and a second-order model?
-
A first-order model is a set of individuals and an interpretation that assigns a truth value to each formula in a first-order language, while a second-order model is a set of properties and an interpretation that assigns a truth value to each formula in a second-order language.
-
A first-order model is a set of properties and an interpretation that assigns a truth value to each formula in a first-order language, while a second-order model is a set of individuals and an interpretation that assigns a truth value to each formula in a second-order language.
-
A first-order model is a set of individuals and an interpretation that assigns a property to each individual, while a second-order model is a set of properties and an interpretation that assigns a property to each property.
-
A first-order model is a set of properties and an interpretation that assigns a property to each individual, while a second-order model is a set of individuals and an interpretation that assigns a property to each property.
In second-order predicate logic, a first-order model is a set of individuals and an interpretation that assigns a truth value to each formula in a first-order language, while a second-order model is a set of properties and an interpretation that assigns a truth value to each formula in a second-order language.
What is the difference between a first-order satisfaction and a second-order satisfaction?
-
A formula is first-order satisfiable if there exists a first-order model in which the formula is true, and a formula is second-order satisfiable if there exists a second-order model in which the formula is true.
-
A formula is first-order satisfiable if there exists a second-order model in which the formula is true, and a formula is second-order satisfiable if there exists a first-order model in which the formula is true.
-
A formula is first-order satisfiable if there exists a first-order model in which the formula is false, and a formula is second-order satisfiable if there exists a second-order model in which the formula is false.
-
A formula is first-order satisfiable if there exists a second-order model in which the formula is false, and a formula is second-order satisfiable if there exists a first-order model in which the formula is false.
In second-order predicate logic, a formula is first-order satisfiable if there exists a first-order model in which the formula is true, and a formula is second-order satisfiable if there exists a second-order model in which the formula is true.
What is the difference between a first-order validity and a second-order validity?
-
A formula is first-order valid if it is true in all first-order models, and a formula is second-order valid if it is true in all second-order models.
-
A formula is first-order valid if it is true in all second-order models, and a formula is second-order valid if it is true in all first-order models.
-
A formula is first-order valid if it is false in all first-order models, and a formula is second-order valid if it is false in all second-order models.
-
A formula is first-order valid if it is false in all second-order models, and a formula is second-order valid if it is false in all first-order models.
In second-order predicate logic, a formula is first-order valid if it is true in all first-order models, and a formula is second-order valid if it is true in all second-order models.