Money is used in party primaries to fund campaign activities such as advertising, travel, and staff salaries.

Holding rallies is not a way that money can be used to influence voters' decisions in party primaries.

Money can affect the outcome of party primaries in all of the ways listed above.

Money can have a number of negative consequences in party primaries, including leading to corruption, making it difficult for challengers to compete against incumbents, and discouraging qualified candidates from running for office.

A number of reforms have been proposed to address the role of money in party primaries, including public financing of elections, campaign finance limits, and increased transparency.

Matching funds are not a type of campaign finance limit.

Disclosure requirements in campaign finance serve all of the purposes listed above.

Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission was a Supreme Court case that overturned the ban on corporate and union spending in elections.

The Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission Supreme Court case had a number of negative consequences, including leading to a significant increase in corporate and union spending in elections, making it more difficult for challengers to compete against incumbents, and discouraging qualified candidates from running for office.

There are a number of challenges to reforming the role of money in party primaries, including the influence of special interests, the First Amendment, and the lack of public support for reform.

The Federal Election Commission (FEC) is responsible for enforcing campaign finance laws, providing guidance to candidates and committees on campaign finance laws, and investigating allegations of campaign finance violations.

The Federal Election Commission (FEC) has been criticized for being too partisan, not effective in enforcing campaign finance laws, and too lenient on candidates and committees who violate campaign finance laws.

A number of reforms have been proposed to the Federal Election Commission (FEC), including making the FEC more bipartisan, giving the FEC more resources to enforce campaign finance laws, and increasing the penalties for violating campaign finance laws.

The future of campaign finance reform is unclear. It is possible that there will be more reforms in the future, but it is also possible that there will be fewer reforms or no more reforms at all.