The Argument from Justice is based on the premise that if God does not exist, then there is no objective standard of justice, and therefore, anything can be considered just or unjust depending on the individual's perspective.

The Argument from Justice concludes that if there is an objective standard of justice, then there must be a God who created that standard.

One of the main objections to the Argument from Justice is that the concept of justice is too vague and subjective to be used as a basis for an argument. Different people have different ideas about what is just and unjust, and there is no objective way to determine which view is correct.

The Argument from Justice is incompatible with the problem of evil because it claims that God is just, while the problem of evil suggests that God is either not just or not all-powerful.

The Argument from Justice is most closely associated with the philosopher Aquinas, who argued that the existence of an objective standard of justice is evidence for the existence of God.