Appellate Jurisdiction
Description: This quiz will test your knowledge of Appellate Jurisdiction. | |
Number of Questions: 14 | |
Created by: Aliensbrain Bot | |
Tags: appellate jurisdiction law |
Which court has the highest appellate jurisdiction in the United States?
-
Supreme Court of the United States
-
United States Court of Appeals
-
United States District Court
-
State Supreme Court
The Supreme Court of the United States is the highest court in the United States and has the final say on all legal matters.
What is the general rule for appellate jurisdiction?
-
A court has appellate jurisdiction over cases that have been appealed from a lower court.
-
A court has appellate jurisdiction over cases that have been brought directly to it.
-
A court has appellate jurisdiction over cases that have been decided by a jury.
-
A court has appellate jurisdiction over cases that have been decided by a judge.
The general rule for appellate jurisdiction is that a court has appellate jurisdiction over cases that have been appealed from a lower court.
What are the three main types of appellate jurisdiction?
-
Original jurisdiction, exclusive jurisdiction, and concurrent jurisdiction
-
Mandatory jurisdiction, discretionary jurisdiction, and permissive jurisdiction
-
Civil jurisdiction, criminal jurisdiction, and administrative jurisdiction
-
Federal jurisdiction, state jurisdiction, and tribal jurisdiction
The three main types of appellate jurisdiction are mandatory jurisdiction, discretionary jurisdiction, and permissive jurisdiction.
What is mandatory appellate jurisdiction?
-
A court must hear an appeal in a case if it meets certain criteria.
-
A court may hear an appeal in a case if it meets certain criteria.
-
A court has the option of hearing an appeal in a case if it meets certain criteria.
-
A court cannot hear an appeal in a case if it meets certain criteria.
Mandatory appellate jurisdiction is a court's obligation to hear an appeal in a case if it meets certain criteria.
What is discretionary appellate jurisdiction?
-
A court must hear an appeal in a case if it meets certain criteria.
-
A court may hear an appeal in a case if it meets certain criteria.
-
A court has the option of hearing an appeal in a case if it meets certain criteria.
-
A court cannot hear an appeal in a case if it meets certain criteria.
Discretionary appellate jurisdiction is a court's power to hear an appeal in a case if it meets certain criteria.
What is permissive appellate jurisdiction?
-
A court must hear an appeal in a case if it meets certain criteria.
-
A court may hear an appeal in a case if it meets certain criteria.
-
A court has the option of hearing an appeal in a case if it meets certain criteria.
-
A court cannot hear an appeal in a case if it meets certain criteria.
Permissive appellate jurisdiction is a court's power to hear an appeal in a case if it meets certain criteria.
What is the difference between mandatory and discretionary appellate jurisdiction?
-
Mandatory appellate jurisdiction is a court's obligation to hear an appeal in a case if it meets certain criteria, while discretionary appellate jurisdiction is a court's power to hear an appeal in a case if it meets certain criteria.
-
Mandatory appellate jurisdiction is a court's power to hear an appeal in a case if it meets certain criteria, while discretionary appellate jurisdiction is a court's obligation to hear an appeal in a case if it meets certain criteria.
-
Mandatory appellate jurisdiction is a court's power to hear an appeal in a case if it meets certain criteria, while discretionary appellate jurisdiction is a court's power to hear an appeal in a case if it meets certain criteria.
-
Mandatory appellate jurisdiction is a court's obligation to hear an appeal in a case if it meets certain criteria, while discretionary appellate jurisdiction is a court's obligation to hear an appeal in a case if it meets certain criteria.
Mandatory appellate jurisdiction is a court's obligation to hear an appeal in a case if it meets certain criteria, while discretionary appellate jurisdiction is a court's power to hear an appeal in a case if it meets certain criteria.
What is the difference between permissive and discretionary appellate jurisdiction?
-
Permissive appellate jurisdiction is a court's obligation to hear an appeal in a case if it meets certain criteria, while discretionary appellate jurisdiction is a court's power to hear an appeal in a case if it meets certain criteria.
-
Permissive appellate jurisdiction is a court's power to hear an appeal in a case if it meets certain criteria, while discretionary appellate jurisdiction is a court's obligation to hear an appeal in a case if it meets certain criteria.
-
Permissive appellate jurisdiction is a court's power to hear an appeal in a case if it meets certain criteria, while discretionary appellate jurisdiction is a court's power to hear an appeal in a case if it meets certain criteria.
-
Permissive appellate jurisdiction is a court's obligation to hear an appeal in a case if it meets certain criteria, while discretionary appellate jurisdiction is a court's obligation to hear an appeal in a case if it meets certain criteria.
Permissive appellate jurisdiction is a court's power to hear an appeal in a case if it meets certain criteria, while discretionary appellate jurisdiction is a court's power to hear an appeal in a case if it meets certain criteria.
What are the factors that a court considers when deciding whether to exercise its discretionary appellate jurisdiction?
-
The importance of the issue involved in the case
-
The likelihood that the court will reverse the lower court's decision
-
The availability of other remedies for the appellant
-
All of the above
A court considers all of the above factors when deciding whether to exercise its discretionary appellate jurisdiction.
What is the general rule for the scope of appellate review?
-
An appellate court will review the entire record of the case.
-
An appellate court will only review the issues that were raised in the appellant's brief.
-
An appellate court will only review the issues that were raised in the appellee's brief.
-
An appellate court will only review the issues that were raised in both the appellant's and appellee's briefs.
The general rule for the scope of appellate review is that an appellate court will only review the issues that were raised in the appellant's brief.
What is the de novo standard of review?
-
An appellate court will review the entire record of the case and make its own findings of fact and conclusions of law.
-
An appellate court will only review the issues that were raised in the appellant's brief.
-
An appellate court will only review the issues that were raised in the appellee's brief.
-
An appellate court will only review the issues that were raised in both the appellant's and appellee's briefs.
The de novo standard of review is an appellate court's review of the entire record of the case and making its own findings of fact and conclusions of law.
What is the abuse of discretion standard of review?
-
An appellate court will review the entire record of the case and make its own findings of fact and conclusions of law.
-
An appellate court will only review the issues that were raised in the appellant's brief.
-
An appellate court will only review the issues that were raised in the appellee's brief.
-
An appellate court will only review the issues that were raised in both the appellant's and appellee's briefs.
The abuse of discretion standard of review is an appellate court's review of the entire record of the case and making its own findings of fact and conclusions of law.
What is the clearly erroneous standard of review?
-
An appellate court will review the entire record of the case and make its own findings of fact and conclusions of law.
-
An appellate court will only review the issues that were raised in the appellant's brief.
-
An appellate court will only review the issues that were raised in the appellee's brief.
-
An appellate court will only review the issues that were raised in both the appellant's and appellee's briefs.
The clearly erroneous standard of review is an appellate court's review of the entire record of the case and making its own findings of fact and conclusions of law.
What is the harmless error standard of review?
-
An appellate court will review the entire record of the case and make its own findings of fact and conclusions of law.
-
An appellate court will only review the issues that were raised in the appellant's brief.
-
An appellate court will only review the issues that were raised in the appellee's brief.
-
An appellate court will only review the issues that were raised in both the appellant's and appellee's briefs.
The harmless error standard of review is an appellate court's review of the entire record of the case and making its own findings of fact and conclusions of law.