Gender is not a factor that directly influences occupational prestige. However, it can indirectly affect prestige through its impact on income, education, and skill level.

The functionalist perspective argues that social stratification serves to maintain social order and stability by allocating individuals to different positions in society based on their skills and abilities.

High social status does not necessarily lead to a lower risk of social exclusion. In fact, individuals with high social status may be more likely to experience social exclusion due to their privileged position.

The functionalist theory argues that occupational prestige is determined by the level of skill, knowledge, and training required for a particular job, as these factors contribute to the overall functioning of society.

Age is not a dimension of social status, as it does not reflect an individual's position in the social hierarchy.

The conflict perspective argues that social stratification is caused by competition for scarce resources, such as wealth, power, and prestige, which leads to the emergence of different social classes.

Horizontal mobility is not a type of social mobility, as it refers to movement within the same social stratum, rather than movement between different strata.

Job security is not a factor that directly contributes to occupational prestige. However, it can indirectly affect prestige through its impact on income, education, and skill level.

Low social status does not necessarily lead to improved health and well-being. In fact, individuals with low social status may be more likely to experience health problems and lower well-being due to their disadvantaged position.

The symbolic interactionist theory argues that occupational prestige is determined by the level of autonomy and control that workers have over their work, as these factors contribute to the overall meaning and significance of the occupation.

Wealth is not a dimension of social stratification, as it does not reflect an individual's position in the social hierarchy.

The rational choice perspective argues that individuals pursue certain occupations primarily to maximize their income and material rewards, as these factors contribute to their overall well-being.

Horizontal mobility is not a type of social mobility, as it refers to movement within the same social stratum, rather than movement between different strata.

Job security is not a factor that directly contributes to occupational prestige. However, it can indirectly affect prestige through its impact on income, education, and skill level.

Low social status does not necessarily lead to improved health and well-being. In fact, individuals with low social status may be more likely to experience health problems and lower well-being due to their disadvantaged position.