Metaethics: Moral Intuitionism vs. Consequentialism
Description: This quiz will test your understanding of the two major ethical theories: Moral Intuitionism and Consequentialism. You will be presented with questions that explore the key concepts and arguments of each theory, as well as their strengths and weaknesses. | |
Number of Questions: 15 | |
Created by: Aliensbrain Bot | |
Tags: metaethics moral intuitionism consequentialism ethics |
Which ethical theory emphasizes the importance of following moral rules and principles, regardless of the consequences?
Which ethical theory emphasizes the importance of maximizing overall happiness or well-being?
According to Moral Intuitionism, what is the source of moral knowledge?
According to Consequentialism, what is the rightness or wrongness of an action determined by?
Which ethical theory is more likely to support the idea that lying is always wrong, even if it would save a life?
Which ethical theory is more likely to support the idea that it is sometimes permissible to sacrifice the interests of a few for the benefit of the many?
Which ethical theory is more likely to support the idea that there are certain moral duties that we owe to others, regardless of our own interests?
Which ethical theory is more likely to support the idea that the ends justify the means?
Which ethical theory is more likely to support the idea that we should always tell the truth, even if it means hurting someone's feelings?
Which ethical theory is more likely to support the idea that we should always keep our promises, even if it means breaking the law?
Which ethical theory is more likely to support the idea that we should always obey the law, even if it means going against our conscience?
Which ethical theory is more likely to support the idea that we should always respect the rights of others, even if it means sacrificing our own interests?
Which ethical theory is more likely to support the idea that we should always be honest, even if it means losing a friend?
Which ethical theory is more likely to support the idea that we should always be fair, even if it means losing a competition?
Which ethical theory is more likely to support the idea that we should always be kind, even if it means being taken advantage of?