No person shall be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.

No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of War or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offense to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.

No person shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.

To allow the government to take private property for public use.

To allow the government to regulate the use of private property.

To allow the government to tax private property.

The government must pay just compensation for the property taken.

The property must be taken for a public use.

Both of the above.

Eminent domain is the power of the government to take private property for public use, while condemnation is the process by which the government actually takes the property.

Eminent domain is the process by which the government takes private property for public use, while condemnation is the power of the government to take private property for public use.

There is no difference between eminent domain and condemnation.

The fair market value of the property taken.

The amount of money that the government paid for the property.

The amount of money that the property owner paid for the property.

The construction of roads, schools, and parks.

The development of affordable housing.

The redevelopment of blighted areas.

All of the above.

It is a violation of private property rights.

It can lead to the displacement of people and businesses.

It can result in the loss of affordable housing.

All of the above.

That the government is not taking the property for a public use.

That the government is not paying just compensation for the property.

That the taking of the property will result in a hardship for the property owner.

All of the above.

To determine whether the government has the authority to take the property.

To determine whether the government is paying just compensation for the property.

To determine whether the taking of the property will result in a hardship for the property owner.

All of the above.

Kelo v. City of New London.

Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York City.

Hawaii Housing Authority v. Midkiff.

All of the above.

The Supreme Court is likely to continue to uphold the government's power of eminent domain.

The Supreme Court is likely to limit the government's power of eminent domain.

It is unclear what the future of eminent domain holds.

None of the above.

Negotiation.

Mediation.

Arbitration.

All of the above.

The Institute for Justice.

The National Association of Realtors.

The American Civil Liberties Union.

All of the above.

Educate themselves about their rights.

Get involved in the political process.

Support organizations that are fighting to protect property rights.

All of the above.

It is a powerful tool that the government can use to take private property for public use.

It is a right that property owners have to protect their property from being taken by the government.

It is a complex legal issue that can be difficult to understand.

All of the above.