The primary goal of environmental health risk assessment is to identify and characterize environmental hazards, including their sources, pathways, and potential adverse effects on human health and the environment.

Risk management is not a key step in environmental health risk assessment, but rather a separate process that follows risk assessment and involves the development and implementation of strategies to reduce or eliminate risks.

The purpose of dose-response assessment is to determine the relationship between the dose of an environmental hazard and its adverse effects, including the threshold dose, the slope of the dose-response curve, and the shape of the curve.

Social hazards are not typically considered environmental hazards, as they are not directly related to the physical environment.

The primary goal of environmental health risk management is to develop strategies for reducing or eliminating risks to human health and the environment, based on the findings of risk assessment.

Education and awareness are not typically considered risk management strategies, as they do not directly reduce or eliminate risks.

The purpose of risk communication in environmental health is to inform the public about environmental hazards and risks, including their sources, pathways, and potential adverse effects, as well as the actions that can be taken to reduce or eliminate these risks.

Peer-reviewed journals are not typically used for risk communication, as they are not accessible to the general public.

Uncertainty is always present in environmental health risk assessment and management due to incomplete knowledge and variability. It is important to acknowledge and address uncertainty, rather than ignoring it or assuming worst-case scenarios.

Scientific consensus is not a source of uncertainty, but rather a reflection of the agreement among experts on the state of knowledge regarding a particular environmental health risk.

The purpose of sensitivity analysis in environmental health risk assessment is to identify key factors that contribute to uncertainty in the risk estimates, such as the choice of exposure scenarios, dose-response models, and input parameters.

Peer review is not a method for conducting sensitivity analysis, but rather a process for evaluating the quality and validity of scientific research.

Risk perception influences public attitudes and behaviors, and can affect the acceptability of risk management strategies. It is important to consider risk perception in risk assessment and management, but it should not be the sole basis for decision-making.

Scientific evidence is not typically considered a factor that influences risk perception, as risk perception is often based on subjective factors and emotions rather than objective data.

Stakeholder engagement helps to identify and address concerns, build trust, and increase the acceptability of risk management decisions. It is important to engage stakeholders throughout the risk assessment and management process.