Rene Descartes

David Hume

Immanuel Kant

William James

Free will is an illusion.

Determinism is the only valid explanation for human behavior.

Human behavior is determined by both internal factors and external circumstances.

Free will and determinism are compatible concepts.

It denies the existence of evil.

It argues that evil is a necessary part of a larger, ultimately good plan.

It maintains that evil is the result of human free will.

It suggests that evil is caused by a combination of human choices and external circumstances.

A person chooses to steal because they are inherently greedy.

A person chooses to help someone in need because they are inherently compassionate.

A person chooses to pursue a career in medicine because they are influenced by their parents' expectations.

A person chooses to become a musician because they are inspired by their favorite band.

Soft determinism allows for the possibility of free will, while hard determinism does not.

Soft determinism emphasizes the role of external factors in shaping human behavior, while hard determinism focuses on internal factors.

Soft determinism is based on the idea that the future is fixed, while hard determinism holds that the future is open and unpredictable.

Soft determinism is compatible with the idea of moral responsibility, while hard determinism is not.

It is too vague and does not provide a clear explanation for human behavior.

It is incompatible with the idea of moral responsibility.

It is based on the assumption that human beings have free will, which is a dubious concept.

It fails to account for the role of chance and randomness in human decision-making.

Soft determinism undermines the idea of moral responsibility.

Soft determinism is compatible with the idea of moral responsibility.

Soft determinism implies that individuals are not responsible for their actions.

Soft determinism suggests that moral responsibility is solely determined by external factors.

John Locke

David Hume

Immanuel Kant

William James

Soft determinism is a form of compatibilism.

Soft determinism is opposed to compatibilism.

Compatibilism is a theory that reconciles free will with determinism.

Compatibilism is a theory that denies the existence of free will.

Soft determinism denies the existence of human agency.

Soft determinism maintains that human agency is an illusion.

Soft determinism argues that human agency is entirely determined by external factors.

Soft determinism allows for the possibility of genuine human agency.

Individuals have no control over their actions.

Moral responsibility is an outdated concept.

The future is entirely predetermined.

Human beings have genuine freedom of choice.

Soft determinism allows for the possibility of free will, while libertarianism denies it.

Soft determinism emphasizes the role of external factors in shaping free will, while libertarianism focuses on internal factors.

Soft determinism is based on the idea that the future is fixed, while libertarianism holds that the future is open and unpredictable.

Soft determinism is compatible with the idea of moral responsibility, while libertarianism is not.

It is too vague and does not provide a clear explanation for human behavior.

It is incompatible with the idea of moral responsibility.

It is based on the assumption that human beings have free will, which is a dubious concept.

It fails to account for the role of chance and randomness in human decision-making.

Soft determinism undermines the idea of moral responsibility.

Soft determinism is compatible with the idea of moral responsibility.

Soft determinism implies that individuals are not responsible for their actions.

Soft determinism suggests that moral responsibility is solely determined by external factors.

John Locke

David Hume

Immanuel Kant

William James