Hearsay evidence is generally inadmissible in court because it is considered to be unreliable. This is because the person who made the statement is not present in court and cannot be cross-examined.

There are a number of exceptions to the hearsay rule, including excited utterances, present sense impressions, and dying declarations. These exceptions are based on the idea that the statements are reliable even though the person who made them is not present in court.

An excited utterance is a statement made under the influence of excitement. This means that the statement was made without the person having time to think about it or fabricate it. Excited utterances are admissible in court as an exception to the hearsay rule.

A present sense impression is a statement made about an event that is happening at the time the statement is made. This means that the person who made the statement is perceiving the event with their own senses. Present sense impressions are admissible in court as an exception to the hearsay rule.

A dying declaration is a statement made by a person who is about to die. This means that the person who made the statement believes that they are going to die and that they have no hope of recovery. Dying declarations are admissible in court as an exception to the hearsay rule.

In order for a dying declaration to be admissible in court, the declarant must be about to die, have no hope of recovery, and be competent to testify. This means that the declarant must be able to understand the questions that are being asked of them and must be able to give truthful answers.

The hearsay rule is a rule of evidence that prohibits the admission of out-of-court statements. This means that a witness cannot testify about something that they heard someone else say unless the statement falls within an exception to the hearsay rule.

The three main types of hearsay are prior statements, dying declarations, and excited utterances. Prior statements are statements that were made before the trial. Dying declarations are statements that were made by a person who was about to die. Excited utterances are statements that were made under the influence of excitement.

The main difference between a prior statement and a dying declaration is that a prior statement is made before the trial, while a dying declaration is made after the trial. Prior statements are usually made by witnesses, while dying declarations are usually made by victims.

The main difference between an excited utterance and a present sense impression is that an excited utterance is made under the influence of excitement, while a present sense impression is made under the influence of pain. Excited utterances are usually made immediately after an event, while present sense impressions are usually made during an event.

There are a number of exceptions to the hearsay rule, including excited utterances, present sense impressions, and dying declarations. These exceptions are based on the idea that the statements are reliable even though the person who made them is not present in court.

The excited utterance exception to the hearsay rule allows statements made under the influence of excitement to be admitted in court. This is because such statements are considered to be reliable, even though the person who made them is not present in court.

The present sense impression exception to the hearsay rule allows statements made about an event that is happening at the time the statement is made to be admitted in court. This is because such statements are considered to be reliable, even though the person who made them is not present in court.

The dying declaration exception to the hearsay rule allows statements made by a person who is about to die to be admitted in court. This is because such statements are considered to be reliable, even though the person who made them is not present in court.