To determine the winner and loser of a dispute.

To find a mutually acceptable solution to a dispute.

To punish the party responsible for the dispute.

To create a legal record of the dispute.

Litigation

Arbitration

Mediation

Conciliation

To act as a judge and decide the outcome of the dispute.

To facilitate communication between the parties and help them reach an agreement.

To investigate the facts of the dispute and make recommendations for a settlement.

To enforce the terms of a settlement agreement.

ADR methods are typically faster and less expensive than litigation.

ADR methods are more confidential than litigation.

ADR methods allow the parties to have more control over the outcome of the dispute.

All of the above.

In arbitration, the decision of the arbitrator is binding on the parties, while in mediation, the parties are free to accept or reject the mediator's recommendations.

In arbitration, the parties present their case to a neutral third party, while in mediation, the mediator helps the parties to communicate and negotiate with each other.

In arbitration, the proceedings are typically confidential, while in mediation, the proceedings are typically open to the public.

Both A and B.

Arbitration

Mediation

Conciliation

Negotiation

Arbitration

Mediation

Conciliation

Negotiation

To act as a judge and decide the outcome of the dispute.

To facilitate communication between the parties and help them reach an agreement.

To investigate the facts of the dispute and make recommendations for a settlement.

To enforce the terms of a settlement agreement.

ADR methods can help to avoid the delays and costs of litigation in foreign courts.

ADR methods can be more flexible and adaptable than litigation, allowing for a wider range of solutions to be considered.

ADR methods can help to preserve relationships between the parties, which can be important in ongoing business relationships.

All of the above.

To act as a neutral third party and decide the outcome of the dispute.

To facilitate communication between the parties and help them reach an agreement.

To investigate the facts of the dispute and make recommendations for a settlement.

To enforce the terms of a settlement agreement.

ADR methods can help to avoid the delays and costs of litigation in the courts.

ADR methods can be more flexible and adaptable than litigation, allowing for a wider range of solutions to be considered.

ADR methods can help to preserve relationships between the parties, which can be important in ongoing personal relationships.

All of the above.

To act as a neutral third party and decide the outcome of the dispute.

To facilitate communication between the parties and help them reach an agreement.

To investigate the facts of the dispute and make recommendations for a settlement.

To determine the facts of the dispute and make a decision based on the law.

ADR methods can help to avoid the delays and costs of litigation in the courts.

ADR methods can be more flexible and adaptable than litigation, allowing for a wider range of solutions to be considered.

ADR methods can help to preserve relationships between the parties, which can be important in ongoing business relationships.

All of the above.

To provide evidence and information about the dispute to the court or tribunal.

To act as a neutral third party and help the parties to reach an agreement.

To investigate the facts of the dispute and make recommendations for a settlement.

To enforce the terms of a settlement agreement.