- Normative Ethics
- Normative Ethics - Quizzes
- Theories of Utilitarianism and Consequentialism
Theories of Utilitarianism and Consequentialism
Description: Welcome to the quiz on Theories of Utilitarianism and Consequentialism. This quiz will test your understanding of the key concepts and arguments associated with these ethical theories. | |
Number of Questions: 14 | |
Created by: Aliensbrain Bot | |
Tags: ethics utilitarianism consequentialism philosophy |
Which of the following is a central tenet of utilitarianism?
-
The greatest happiness for the greatest number.
-
The end justifies the means.
-
Virtue is the highest good.
-
Pleasure is the only good.
Utilitarianism is an ethical theory that holds that the morally right action is the one that produces the greatest amount of happiness or well-being for the greatest number of people.
Who is considered the father of utilitarianism?
-
John Stuart Mill
-
Jeremy Bentham
-
David Hume
-
Immanuel Kant
Jeremy Bentham is widely regarded as the father of utilitarianism. He developed the concept of the felicific calculus, a method for calculating the amount of happiness or unhappiness produced by an action.
What is the principle of utility?
-
Actions are right in proportion as they tend to promote happiness.
-
Actions are right in proportion as they tend to promote virtue.
-
Actions are right in proportion as they tend to promote wealth.
-
Actions are right in proportion as they tend to promote power.
The principle of utility is the fundamental principle of utilitarianism. It states that the morally right action is the one that produces the greatest amount of happiness or well-being for the greatest number of people.
What is the difference between act utilitarianism and rule utilitarianism?
-
Act utilitarianism evaluates the rightness or wrongness of individual actions, while rule utilitarianism evaluates the rightness or wrongness of general rules.
-
Act utilitarianism evaluates the rightness or wrongness of general rules, while rule utilitarianism evaluates the rightness or wrongness of individual actions.
-
Act utilitarianism evaluates the rightness or wrongness of both individual actions and general rules.
-
Rule utilitarianism evaluates the rightness or wrongness of both individual actions and general rules.
Act utilitarianism evaluates the rightness or wrongness of individual actions based on their consequences, while rule utilitarianism evaluates the rightness or wrongness of general rules based on their consequences.
What is the trolley problem?
-
A thought experiment in which a person must choose between saving five people tied to a track by sacrificing one person or doing nothing and allowing all five people to die.
-
A thought experiment in which a person must choose between saving one person tied to a track by sacrificing five people or doing nothing and allowing the one person to die.
-
A thought experiment in which a person must choose between saving five people tied to a track by sacrificing themselves or doing nothing and allowing all five people to die.
-
A thought experiment in which a person must choose between saving one person tied to a track by sacrificing themselves or doing nothing and allowing the one person to die.
The trolley problem is a thought experiment in ethics that raises questions about the morality of sacrificing one person to save many.
What is the main criticism of utilitarianism?
-
It is too consequentialist.
-
It is too deontological.
-
It is too subjective.
-
It is too objective.
The main criticism of utilitarianism is that it is too consequentialist, meaning that it places too much emphasis on the consequences of an action and not enough on the inherent rightness or wrongness of the action itself.
Which of the following is an example of a consequentialist ethical theory?
-
Kantianism
-
Virtue ethics
-
Egoism
-
Stoicism
Egoism is an example of a consequentialist ethical theory because it holds that the morally right action is the one that produces the greatest amount of happiness or well-being for the agent.
What is the difference between consequentialism and deontology?
-
Consequentialism evaluates the rightness or wrongness of actions based on their consequences, while deontology evaluates the rightness or wrongness of actions based on their inherent rightness or wrongness.
-
Consequentialism evaluates the rightness or wrongness of actions based on their inherent rightness or wrongness, while deontology evaluates the rightness or wrongness of actions based on their consequences.
-
Consequentialism evaluates the rightness or wrongness of both actions and rules based on their consequences, while deontology evaluates the rightness or wrongness of both actions and rules based on their inherent rightness or wrongness.
-
Consequentialism evaluates the rightness or wrongness of both actions and rules based on their inherent rightness or wrongness, while deontology evaluates the rightness or wrongness of both actions and rules based on their consequences.
Consequentialism evaluates the rightness or wrongness of actions based on their consequences, while deontology evaluates the rightness or wrongness of actions based on their inherent rightness or wrongness.
What is the principle of double effect?
-
A principle that allows for the intentional killing of an innocent person if it is the only way to prevent a greater evil.
-
A principle that allows for the unintentional killing of an innocent person if it is the only way to prevent a greater evil.
-
A principle that allows for the intentional killing of an innocent person if it is the only way to save a greater number of people.
-
A principle that allows for the unintentional killing of an innocent person if it is the only way to save a greater number of people.
The principle of double effect allows for the unintentional killing of an innocent person if it is the only way to prevent a greater evil.
What is the difference between positive and negative utilitarianism?
-
Positive utilitarianism focuses on maximizing happiness, while negative utilitarianism focuses on minimizing suffering.
-
Positive utilitarianism focuses on minimizing suffering, while negative utilitarianism focuses on maximizing happiness.
-
Positive utilitarianism focuses on both maximizing happiness and minimizing suffering, while negative utilitarianism focuses on neither.
-
Negative utilitarianism focuses on both maximizing happiness and minimizing suffering, while positive utilitarianism focuses on neither.
Positive utilitarianism focuses on maximizing happiness, while negative utilitarianism focuses on minimizing suffering.
Which of the following is an example of a negative utilitarian ethical theory?
-
Hedonism
-
Eudaimonia
-
Preference utilitarianism
-
Average utilitarianism
Average utilitarianism is an example of a negative utilitarian ethical theory because it holds that the morally right action is the one that produces the greatest amount of happiness or well-being for the average person.
What is the difference between preference utilitarianism and hedonistic utilitarianism?
-
Preference utilitarianism takes into account the preferences of individuals, while hedonistic utilitarianism does not.
-
Hedonistic utilitarianism takes into account the preferences of individuals, while preference utilitarianism does not.
-
Preference utilitarianism takes into account both the preferences of individuals and the amount of happiness produced, while hedonistic utilitarianism takes into account only the amount of happiness produced.
-
Hedonistic utilitarianism takes into account both the preferences of individuals and the amount of happiness produced, while preference utilitarianism takes into account only the amount of happiness produced.
Preference utilitarianism takes into account the preferences of individuals, while hedonistic utilitarianism does not.
What is the difference between total utilitarianism and average utilitarianism?
-
Total utilitarianism takes into account the total amount of happiness produced, while average utilitarianism takes into account the average amount of happiness produced.
-
Average utilitarianism takes into account the total amount of happiness produced, while total utilitarianism takes into account the average amount of happiness produced.
-
Total utilitarianism takes into account both the total amount of happiness produced and the average amount of happiness produced, while average utilitarianism takes into account neither.
-
Average utilitarianism takes into account both the total amount of happiness produced and the average amount of happiness produced, while total utilitarianism takes into account neither.
Total utilitarianism takes into account the total amount of happiness produced, while average utilitarianism takes into account the average amount of happiness produced.
What is the difference between rule utilitarianism and act utilitarianism?
-
Rule utilitarianism evaluates the rightness or wrongness of general rules based on their consequences, while act utilitarianism evaluates the rightness or wrongness of individual actions based on their consequences.
-
Act utilitarianism evaluates the rightness or wrongness of general rules based on their consequences, while rule utilitarianism evaluates the rightness or wrongness of individual actions based on their consequences.
-
Rule utilitarianism evaluates the rightness or wrongness of both general rules and individual actions based on their consequences, while act utilitarianism evaluates the rightness or wrongness of neither.
-
Act utilitarianism evaluates the rightness or wrongness of both general rules and individual actions based on their consequences, while rule utilitarianism evaluates the rightness or wrongness of neither.
Rule utilitarianism evaluates the rightness or wrongness of general rules based on their consequences, while act utilitarianism evaluates the rightness or wrongness of individual actions based on their consequences.