0

Propositional Logic: Logical Arguments and Disjunctive Syllogisms

Description: This quiz will test your understanding of propositional logic, logical arguments, and disjunctive syllogisms.
Number of Questions: 15
Created by:
Tags: propositional logic logical arguments disjunctive syllogisms
Attempted 0/15 Correct 0 Score 0

Which of the following is a valid logical argument?

  1. If it is raining, then the ground is wet.

  2. If the ground is wet, then it is raining.

  3. It is raining, therefore the ground is wet.

  4. The ground is wet, therefore it is raining.


Correct Option: A
Explanation:

This is a valid logical argument because the conclusion follows logically from the premise.

Which of the following is an example of a disjunctive syllogism?

  1. Either it is raining or the sun is shining.

  2. If it is raining, then the ground is wet.

  3. It is raining, therefore the ground is wet.

  4. The ground is wet, therefore it is raining.


Correct Option: A
Explanation:

This is an example of a disjunctive syllogism because it has two premises and a conclusion, and the conclusion is a disjunction of the two premises.

Which of the following is a valid disjunctive syllogism?

  1. Either it is raining or the sun is shining.

  2. If it is raining, then the ground is wet.

  3. It is raining, therefore the ground is wet.

  4. The ground is wet, therefore it is raining.


Correct Option: A
Explanation:

This is a valid disjunctive syllogism because the conclusion follows logically from the premises.

Which of the following is an example of a fallacy of affirming the consequent?

  1. If it is raining, then the ground is wet.

  2. If the ground is wet, then it is raining.

  3. It is raining, therefore the ground is wet.

  4. The ground is wet, therefore it is raining.


Correct Option: D
Explanation:

This is an example of a fallacy of affirming the consequent because the conclusion does not follow logically from the premise.

Which of the following is an example of a fallacy of denying the antecedent?

  1. If it is raining, then the ground is wet.

  2. If the ground is wet, then it is raining.

  3. It is raining, therefore the ground is wet.

  4. The ground is not wet, therefore it is not raining.


Correct Option: D
Explanation:

This is an example of a fallacy of denying the antecedent because the conclusion does not follow logically from the premise.

Which of the following is an example of a hypothetical syllogism?

  1. If it is raining, then the ground is wet.

  2. If the ground is wet, then it is raining.

  3. It is raining, therefore the ground is wet.

  4. The ground is wet, therefore it is raining.


Correct Option: A
Explanation:

This is an example of a hypothetical syllogism because it has two premises and a conclusion, and the conclusion is a hypothetical statement.

Which of the following is a valid hypothetical syllogism?

  1. If it is raining, then the ground is wet.

  2. If the ground is wet, then it is raining.

  3. It is raining, therefore the ground is wet.

  4. The ground is wet, therefore it is raining.


Correct Option: A
Explanation:

This is a valid hypothetical syllogism because the conclusion follows logically from the premises.

Which of the following is an example of a categorical syllogism?

  1. All men are mortal.

  2. Socrates is a man.

  3. Therefore, Socrates is mortal.


Correct Option: A
Explanation:

This is an example of a categorical syllogism because it has two premises and a conclusion, and the premises are categorical statements.

Which of the following is a valid categorical syllogism?

  1. All men are mortal.

  2. Socrates is a man.

  3. Therefore, Socrates is mortal.


Correct Option: A
Explanation:

This is a valid categorical syllogism because the conclusion follows logically from the premises.

Which of the following is an example of a fallacy of the undistributed middle term?

  1. All men are mortal.

  2. Socrates is a man.

  3. Therefore, Socrates is mortal.


Correct Option: A
Explanation:

This is an example of a fallacy of the undistributed middle term because the middle term, 'man', is not distributed in either premise.

Which of the following is an example of a fallacy of the four terms?

  1. All men are mortal.

  2. Socrates is a man.

  3. Therefore, Socrates is mortal.


Correct Option: A
Explanation:

This is an example of a fallacy of the four terms because the middle term, 'man', is used in two different senses in the two premises.

Which of the following is an example of a fallacy of the excluded middle?

  1. Either it is raining or it is not raining.

  2. It is raining.

  3. Therefore, it is not raining.


Correct Option: A
Explanation:

This is an example of a fallacy of the excluded middle because it assumes that there are only two possibilities, when in fact there may be more.

Which of the following is an example of a fallacy of affirming the consequent?

  1. If it is raining, then the ground is wet.

  2. The ground is wet.

  3. Therefore, it is raining.


Correct Option: A
Explanation:

This is an example of a fallacy of affirming the consequent because the conclusion does not follow logically from the premises.

Which of the following is an example of a fallacy of denying the antecedent?

  1. If it is raining, then the ground is wet.

  2. It is not raining.

  3. Therefore, the ground is not wet.


Correct Option: A
Explanation:

This is an example of a fallacy of denying the antecedent because the conclusion does not follow logically from the premises.

Which of the following is an example of a valid argument?

  1. All men are mortal.

  2. Socrates is a man.

  3. Therefore, Socrates is mortal.


Correct Option: A
Explanation:

This is an example of a valid argument because the conclusion follows logically from the premises.

- Hide questions