Epicurus argued that if an omnipotent being could create a stone that it could not lift, then it would not be truly omnipotent.

The Paradox of Omnipotence states that if an omnipotent being could create a being that is equal to it in power, then there would be two omnipotent beings, which is a contradiction.

Kant argued that an omnipotent being cannot create a being that is both omnipotent and perfectly good because such a being would be able to create evil, which is a contradiction.

The Argument from Divine Determinism states that if an omnipotent being creates a being that is free to choose, then it cannot control the choices that being makes, which is a contradiction.

Mill argued that an omnipotent being cannot create a being that is capable of suffering because such a being would be imperfect, which is a contradiction.

The Argument from Divine Goodness states that an omnipotent being cannot create a being that is capable of evil because such a being would be imperfect, which is a contradiction.

Kierkegaard argued that an omnipotent being cannot create a being that is capable of understanding its own existence because such a being would be infinite, which is a contradiction.

The Argument from Divine Transcendence states that an omnipotent being cannot create a being that is capable of transcending its own limitations because such a being would be infinite, which is a contradiction.

Hume argued that an omnipotent being cannot create a being that is capable of creating something out of nothing because such a being would be able to create something that is greater than itself, which is a contradiction.

The Argument from Divine Indestructibility states that an omnipotent being cannot create a being that is capable of destroying itself because such a being would be able to destroy something that is greater than itself, which is a contradiction.

Descartes argued that an omnipotent being cannot create a being that is capable of existing in more than one place at the same time because such a being would be infinite, which is a contradiction.

The Argument from Divine Immutability states that an omnipotent being cannot create a being that is capable of changing its own nature because such a being would be able to change something that is greater than itself, which is a contradiction.

Kant argued that an omnipotent being cannot create a being that is capable of knowing the future because such a being would be able to know something that is greater than itself, which is a contradiction.

The Argument from Divine Omniscience states that an omnipotent being cannot create a being that is capable of knowing its own mind because such a being would be able to know something that is greater than itself, which is a contradiction.

Kant argued that an omnipotent being cannot create a being that is capable of knowing the mind of another being because such a being would be able to know something that is greater than itself, which is a contradiction.