Promoting democracy and human rights as prerequisites for peace.

Encouraging economic development as a means to prevent conflict.

Establishing international institutions to mediate and resolve conflicts.

Building a global security system to deter aggression and maintain peace.

Non-intervention in the internal affairs of other states.

Respect for state sovereignty and territorial integrity.

Promotion of free trade and economic interdependence.

Use of military force as a last resort to protect human rights.

To provide a forum for dialogue and negotiation between conflicting parties.

To impose sanctions and other forms of pressure on states that violate international law.

To deploy peacekeeping forces to maintain peace and prevent the resumption of conflict.

All of the above.

The Dayton Agreement that ended the Bosnian War.

The Good Friday Agreement that brought peace to Northern Ireland.

The Oslo Accords between Israel and the Palestinians.

All of the above.

Resistance from authoritarian regimes opposed to democratization.

Economic inequality and social injustice within and between states.

The rise of nationalism and ethnic conflicts.

All of the above.

Francis Fukuyama

Michael Doyle

John Rawls

Immanuel Kant

Liberal Peace is a subset of democratic peace.

Democratic peace is a subset of Liberal Peace.

Liberal Peace and democratic peace are distinct but related concepts.

Liberal Peace and democratic peace are unrelated concepts.

Liberal Peace emphasizes the role of international institutions, while realism focuses on the balance of power.

Liberal Peace emphasizes the importance of economic interdependence, while constructivism focuses on the role of ideas and norms.

Liberal Peace emphasizes the need for military intervention to protect human rights, while realism rejects the use of force.

All of the above.

To promote democracy and human rights.

To provide humanitarian assistance and support peacebuilding efforts.

To monitor and hold governments accountable for their actions.

All of the above.

It is too idealistic and ignores the realities of power politics.

It is too focused on promoting Western values and institutions.

It is too interventionist and undermines the sovereignty of states.

All of the above.

The rise of hybrid peace operations that combine military and civilian components.

The increasing focus on gender equality and women's participation in peacebuilding.

The debate over the use of conditionality in peace agreements.

All of the above.

By promoting cooperation and multilateralism to address climate change.

By addressing the root causes of terrorism, such as poverty and inequality.

By building inclusive and democratic societies that are resilient to terrorism.

All of the above.

The rise of authoritarianism and populism.

The increasing interconnectedness and complexity of global issues.

The erosion of trust in international institutions.

All of the above.

Liberal Peace will continue to be the dominant approach to peacebuilding and conflict resolution.

Liberal Peace will be replaced by new approaches that better address the challenges of the 21st century.

Liberal Peace will evolve and adapt to meet the changing needs of the world.

It is impossible to predict the future of Liberal Peace.

The United Nations

The World Bank

The International Monetary Fund

All of the above.