The behaviorist hypothesis is a theory of learning that emphasizes the role of external stimuli and responses in shaping behavior. It does not address the relationship between language and thought.

The Sapir-Whorf hypothesis proposes that the structure of a language influences the way its speakers think about the world. However, it also acknowledges that thought can influence language.

Linguistic relativity is the idea that the structure of a language influences the way its speakers think about the world. This can be seen in the fact that different languages have different words for the same concept, different grammatical structures, and different ways of expressing emotions.

The universal grammar hypothesis proposes that all languages share a common set of grammatical rules, regardless of their surface differences. This hypothesis is based on the idea that human language is a universal phenomenon that is rooted in our biology.

All of the above options are examples of universal grammatical rules. These rules are found in all languages, regardless of their surface differences.

The cognitive linguistics hypothesis is a broad framework that encompasses a variety of different theories about the relationship between language and thought. These theories share the common belief that language is a cognitive tool that we use to think about the world.

All of the above options are examples of cognitive linguistic theories. These theories propose that language is a cognitive tool that we use to think about the world, and that the structure of language reflects the way that we conceptualize the world.

The theory of conceptual metaphor is a cognitive linguistic theory that proposes that we use metaphors to understand abstract concepts, communicate with each other, and think about the world. For example, we might use the metaphor of a journey to understand the concept of life.

All of the above options are examples of conceptual metaphors. These metaphors allow us to understand abstract concepts by mapping them onto more concrete concepts that we are already familiar with.

The theory of image schemas is a cognitive linguistic theory that proposes that we use mental images to represent concepts, communicate with each other, and think about the world. For example, we might use the image schema of a container to represent the concept of a group of objects.

All of the above options are examples of image schemas. These image schemas are basic mental structures that we use to organize our thoughts and experiences.

The theory of mental spaces is a cognitive linguistic theory that proposes that we use mental spaces to represent different contexts, communicate with each other, and think about the world. For example, we might use a different mental space to represent our work life and our home life.

All of the above options are examples of mental spaces. These mental spaces allow us to organize our thoughts and experiences in a way that makes sense.

All of the above options are ways in which language influences thought. Language provides us with the tools that we need to think about the world, communicate our thoughts to others, and remember and organize our thoughts.

All of the above options are ways in which thought influences language. Our thoughts determine the words that we use, the grammar that we use, and the way that we speak.