According to Wright, truth is not a property of propositions, beliefs, or sentences, but rather a property of facts. Facts are objective states of affairs that exist independently of our beliefs or linguistic expressions.

Wright argues that truth is a necessary condition for knowledge, meaning that in order to know something, it must be true. However, truth alone is not sufficient for knowledge; we also need to have justification for our beliefs.

Wright maintains that justification is necessary for knowledge, meaning that in order to know something, we need to have good reasons or evidence to support our beliefs. However, justification alone is not sufficient for knowledge; we also need the belief to be true.

Wright's theory posits that truth is a necessary condition for knowledge, meaning that in order to know something, it must be true. Additionally, justification is also a necessary condition for knowledge, meaning that we need to have good reasons or evidence to support our beliefs.

One criticism of Wright's Theory of Truth is that it is too narrow in its definition of truth, as it focuses solely on the correspondence between a belief and a fact. Critics argue that this definition excludes other important aspects of truth, such as coherence and pragmatic value.