A propositional connective is a logical operator that connects propositions to form compound propositions. Conjunction is one of the most common propositional connectives, and it is used to combine two propositions into a single proposition that is true if and only if both of the original propositions are true.

The truth value of a proposition is determined by the truth values of its constituent propositions and the logical connectives that connect them. In this case, the proposition "$p \wedge \neg p$" is a conjunction of two propositions, "$p$" and "$\neg p$". Since "$p$" and "$\neg p$" are contradictory propositions, their conjunction is always false.

An inference rule is a rule that allows us to derive new propositions from a given set of propositions. Modus Ponens is a valid inference rule that states that if we have the propositions "$p \rightarrow q$" and "$p$", then we can conclude "$q$".

The negation of a proposition is a proposition that is true if and only if the original proposition is false. In this case, the negation of the proposition "$\forall x \in \mathbb{R}, x^2 \geq 0$" is "$\exists x \in \mathbb{R}, x^2 < 0$", which states that there exists at least one real number whose square is negative.

A first-order predicate logic formula is a formula that contains variables, predicates, and logical connectives. In this case, the formula "$\forall x \in \mathbb{R}, x^2 \geq 0$" is a first-order predicate logic formula because it contains the variable "$x$", the predicate "$x^2 \geq 0$", and the logical connective "$\forall$".

The domain of discourse for a proposition is the set of objects to which the proposition refers. In this case, the proposition "$\forall x \in \mathbb{R}, x^2 \geq 0$" refers to all real numbers, so the domain of discourse is the set of all real numbers.

A valid argument is an argument in which the conclusion follows logically from the premises. In this case, the argument "If it is raining, then the ground is wet. It is raining. Therefore, the ground is wet." is a valid argument because the conclusion "the ground is wet" follows logically from the premises "if it is raining, then the ground is wet" and "it is raining".

The converse of a proposition is a proposition that is formed by switching the antecedent and the consequent of the original proposition. In this case, the converse of the proposition "If it is raining, then the ground is wet" is "If the ground is wet, then it is raining".

A fallacy is an argument that is not valid because it contains a logical error. Affirming the consequent is a fallacy that occurs when we assume that the consequent of a conditional proposition is true and then conclude that the antecedent is also true. For example, the argument "If it is raining, then the ground is wet. The ground is wet. Therefore, it is raining." is a fallacy because it affirms the consequent.

A proposition is a statement that is either true or false, while a statement is a sentence that expresses a thought or idea. Propositions are often used in logic and mathematics, while statements can be used in any context.

A tautology is a propositional formula that is true for all possible combinations of truth values of its constituent propositions. In this case, the propositional formula "$\lnot(p \wedge q) \rightarrow (\lnot p \vee \lnot q)$" is a tautology because it is true for all possible combinations of truth values of "$p$" and "$q$".

The contrapositive of a proposition is a proposition that is formed by negating both the antecedent and the consequent of the original proposition. In this case, the contrapositive of the proposition "If it is raining, then the ground is wet" is "If the ground is not wet, then it is not raining".

A syllogism is a logical argument that consists of two premises and a conclusion. A valid syllogism is a syllogism in which the conclusion follows logically from the premises. In this case, the syllogism "All men are mortal. Socrates is a man. Therefore, Socrates is mortal." is a valid syllogism because the conclusion "Socrates is mortal" follows logically from the premises "All men are mortal" and "Socrates is a man".

A deductive argument is an argument in which the conclusion follows logically from the premises, while an inductive argument is an argument in which the conclusion is supported by evidence. Deductive arguments are always valid, while inductive arguments are not always valid.

Modal logic operators are operators that are used to express the necessity, possibility, obligation, or permission of propositions. In this case, the modal logic operator "Necessity" is used to express the necessity of a proposition.