Oil and gas development often requires the clearing of large areas of land, which can destroy critical habitat for endangered species.

Oil and gas development typically does not lead to increased food availability for endangered species.

Access roads are often the primary cause of habitat loss due to oil and gas development, as they fragment and degrade habitat.

Polar bears are particularly vulnerable to oil and gas development in the Arctic, as they rely on sea ice for hunting and breeding.

Environmental impact assessments are the primary method used to mitigate the impacts of oil and gas development on endangered species, as they identify potential impacts and develop measures to avoid or minimize them.

Oil and gas development typically does not lead to improved water clarity.

Flaring, the burning of excess natural gas, is the primary cause of air pollution from oil and gas development.

Air pollution from oil and gas development typically does not lead to improved cognitive function.

Flaring reduction is the primary method used to reduce air pollution from oil and gas development, as it reduces the amount of natural gas that is burned.

Climate change typically does not lead to improved energy efficiency.

Carbon capture and storage is the primary method used to mitigate the impacts of climate change on oil and gas development, as it reduces the amount of greenhouse gases that are released into the atmosphere.

Oil and gas development typically does not lead to reduced air pollution.

Changing consumer behavior is the primary challenge facing the oil and gas industry in the transition to a clean energy future, as consumers need to be convinced to adopt new technologies and practices.

Lobbying against government regulations is not a potential solution to the challenges facing the oil and gas industry in the transition to a clean energy future.

Government has a role to play in all of the above areas in order to facilitate the transition to a clean energy future.