Errors not properly preserved in the trial court cannot be raised on appeal.

Errors are automatically preserved for appeal.

Errors can be preserved by filing a notice of appeal.

Errors can be preserved by objecting to the error at trial.

Filing a motion for a new trial

Objecting to the error at trial

Including the error in the notice of appeal

All of the above

To give the trial court an opportunity to correct the error

To allow the appellant to argue the error on appeal

To prevent the error from being waived

All of the above

It must be specific

It must be timely

It must be made on the record

All of the above

A general objection challenges the entire ruling of the trial court, while a specific objection challenges only a specific part of the ruling.

A general objection is more likely to be sustained on appeal than a specific objection.

A general objection is less likely to waive the error than a specific objection.

None of the above

The error is waived and cannot be raised on appeal.

The error is preserved for appellate review.

The error is subject to harmless error analysis.

None of the above

An error that does not affect the outcome of the case.

An error that is not preserved for appellate review.

An error that is waived by the appellant.

None of the above

The error must be more likely than not to have affected the outcome of the case.

The error must have a substantial and injurious effect on the appellant.

The error must be plain error.

None of the above

An error that is obvious and affects the substantial rights of the appellant.

An error that is preserved for appellate review.

An error that is waived by the appellant.

None of the above

The error can be raised on appeal even if it was not preserved.

The error is subject to harmless error analysis.

The error is automatically reversible.

None of the above

A motion for a new trial asks the trial court to set aside the verdict and order a new trial, while a motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict asks the trial court to enter judgment for the moving party despite the verdict.

A motion for a new trial is more likely to be granted than a motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict.

A motion for a new trial is subject to harmless error analysis, while a motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict is not.

None of the above

Errors of law

Errors of fact

Newly discovered evidence

All of the above

The evidence is insufficient to support the verdict

The verdict is against the weight of the evidence

There is a legal error in the instructions to the jury

All of the above

Abuse of discretion

De novo review

Plain error

None of the above

De novo review

Plain error

Abuse of discretion

None of the above